Re: [Gluster-users] NFS timeouts?

2016-12-01 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 01/12/2016 à 13:12, Yannick Perret a écrit : Hello, I have a client machine that mounts as NFS a replicate x2 volume. Practicaly this is configured with automount such as: DIR-NAME -rw,soft,intr server1,server2:/VOLUME Gluster servers are using 3.6.7. Sometimes the NFS blocks on client

[Gluster-users] NFS timeouts?

2016-12-01 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, I have a client machine that mounts as NFS a replicate x2 volume. Practicaly this is configured with automount such as: DIR-NAME -rw,soft,intr server1,server2:/VOLUME Gluster servers are using 3.6.7. Sometimes the NFS blocks on client with server server2 not responding, timed out (here

[Gluster-users] autogen.sh still needed in 3.8.5

2016-10-25 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, some times ago it was reported that 'configure' failed (at least on some distro) on 3.8.1 from official .tgz (see https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users.old/2016-August/027835.html for corresponding discussion). The solution is simple: calling ./autogen.sh before solved to

Re: [Gluster-users] Fuse memleaks, all versions → OOM-killer

2016-08-29 Thread Yannick Perret
ing for (here) read ops until reaching all mem/swap, using the fuse client. Regards, -- Y. Le 02/08/2016 à 19:15, Yannick Perret a écrit : In order to prevent too many swap usage I removed swap on this machine (swapoff -a). Memory usage was still growing. After that I started an other program that ta

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.8.1 issue in compiling from source tarball

2016-08-04 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 04/08/2016 à 18:13, Yannick Perret a écrit : Le 04/08/2016 à 17:39, Niels de Vos a écrit : On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:13:40PM +0200, Yannick Perret wrote: Le 03/08/2016 à 17:01, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY a écrit : On 08/03/2016 10:42 AM, Yannick Perret wrote: Le 03/08/2016 à 15:33, Amudhan P

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.8.1 issue in compiling from source tarball

2016-08-04 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 04/08/2016 à 17:39, Niels de Vos a écrit : On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:13:40PM +0200, Yannick Perret wrote: Le 03/08/2016 à 17:01, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY a écrit : On 08/03/2016 10:42 AM, Yannick Perret wrote: Le 03/08/2016 à 15:33, Amudhan P a écrit : Hi, I am trying to install gluster 3.8.1

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.8.1 issue in compiling from source tarball

2016-08-04 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 03/08/2016 à 17:01, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY a écrit : On 08/03/2016 10:42 AM, Yannick Perret wrote: Le 03/08/2016 à 15:33, Amudhan P a écrit : Hi, I am trying to install gluster 3.8.1 from tarball in Ubuntu 14.04. 1. when i run "./configure --disable-tiering" at the end showing msg

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.8.1 issue in compiling from source tarball

2016-08-03 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 03/08/2016 à 15:33, Amudhan P a écrit : Hi, I am trying to install gluster 3.8.1 from tarball in Ubuntu 14.04. 1. when i run "./configure --disable-tiering" at the end showing msg configure: WARNING: cache variable ac_cv_build contains a newline configure: WARNING: cache variable

Re: [Gluster-users] Fuse memleaks, all versions

2016-08-02 Thread Yannick Perret
will mostly not be able to perform tests during this time (network connection is too bad where I go). Regards, -- Y. Le 02/08/2016 à 05:11, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a écrit : On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Yannick Perret <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr <mailto:yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr>

Re: [Gluster-users] Fuse memleaks, all versions

2016-08-01 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 29/07/2016 à 18:39, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a écrit : On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Yannick Perret <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr <mailto:yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr>> wrote: Ok, last try: after investigating more versions I found that FUSE client leaks m

Re: [Gluster-users] Fuse memleaks, all versions

2016-07-29 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 29/07/2016 20:27, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a écrit : On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com <mailto:pkara...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Yannick Perret <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr <

[Gluster-users] Fuse memleaks, all versions

2016-07-29 Thread Yannick Perret
Ok, last try: after investigating more versions I found that FUSE client leaks memory on all of them. I tested: - 3.6.7 client on debian 7 32bit and on debian 8 64bit (with 3.6.7 serveurs on debian 8 64bit) - 3.6.9 client on debian 7 32bit and on debian 8 64bit (with 3.6.7 serveurs on debian

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in 3.6.*?

2016-07-27 Thread Yannick Perret
Any help/clues about that? BTW I saw that used memory increase when performing ls -lR but not when performing ls -R. This problem prevent us to use glusterfs client. Regards, -- Y. Le 25/07/2016 16:08, Yannick Perret a écrit : Hello, checking for related problems in bugreports I found

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in 3.6.*?

2016-07-22 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 22/07/2016 21:12, Yannick Perret a écrit : Le 22/07/2016 17:47, Mykola Ulianytskyi a écrit : Hi 3.7 clients are not compatible with 3.6 servers Can you provide more info? I use some 3.7 clients with 3.6 servers and don't see issues. Well, with client 3.7.13 compiled on the same

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in 3.6.*?

2016-07-22 Thread Yannick Perret
onfig : no Regards, -- Y. Thank you -- With best regards, Mykola On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Yannick Perret <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr> wrote: Note: I'm have a dev client machine so I can perform tests or recompile glusterfs client if it can helps getting data about that. I did no

Re: [Gluster-users] Memory leak in 3.6.*?

2016-07-22 Thread Yannick Perret
servers (as far as I can see from my tests). -- Y. Le 22/07/2016 14:06, Yannick Perret a écrit : Hello, some times ago I posted about a memory leak in client process, but it was on a very old 32bit machine (both kernel and OS) and I don't found evidences about a similar problem on our recent

[Gluster-users] Memory leak in 3.6.*?

2016-07-22 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, some times ago I posted about a memory leak in client process, but it was on a very old 32bit machine (both kernel and OS) and I don't found evidences about a similar problem on our recent machines. But I performed more tests and I have the same problem. Clients are 64bit Debian 8.2

[Gluster-users] gluster NFS/rpcbind conflict

2016-07-18 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, just a note to give feedback on a known problem: I have 2 replica servers and for some reasons I use NFS mounts on one of my clients (because it is an old one with which I have troubles with glusterfs native client). I managed to performs NFS mounts from on of the servers but failed on

Re: [Gluster-users] Many logs (errors?) on client → memory problem

2016-06-10 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 10/06/2016 13:08, Mohammed Rafi K C a écrit : On 06/10/2016 02:41 PM, Yannick Perret wrote: I get no feedback on that but I think I found the problem: the glusterfs client grows on memory until no memory available and them it crashes. If we you can take a statedump (kill -SIGUSR1

Re: [Gluster-users] Many logs (errors?) on client → memory problem

2016-06-10 Thread Yannick Perret
) which is fine for me. But maybe WARNING should be the default log level, at least for clients, no? In production getting 3 lines per created directory is useless, and anyone who wants to analyze a problem will switch to INFO or DEBUG. Regards, -- Y. Le 08/06/2016 17:35, Yannick Perret a écrit

[Gluster-users] Many logs (errors?) on client

2016-06-08 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, I have a replica 2 volume managed on 2 identical server, using 3.6.7 version of gluster. Here is the volume info: Volume Name: HOME-LIRIS Type: Replicate Volume ID: 47b4b856-371b-4b8c-8baa-2b7c32d7bb23 Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

[Gluster-users] Rsync on bricks filesystem?

2016-03-30 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, we have some replica-2 volumes and it works fine at this time. For some of the volumes I need to setup daily incremental blackups (on an other filesystem, which don't needs to be on glusterfs). As 'rsync' or similar is not very efficient on glusterfs volumes I tried to use direct

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

2016-03-08 Thread Yannick Perret
local value to client config without umount/mount may be usefull. -- Y. HTH, Krutika On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Yannick Perret <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr <mailto:yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr>> wrote: Le 04/03/2016 13:12, Krutika Dhananjay a écrit : You cou

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

2016-03-04 Thread Yannick Perret
using something like 'mount -o "remount,xlator-option=*replicate*.read-subvolume-index=X" …' will allow the client to point to the new target without stopping volume availability for clients? -- Y. -Krutika -------

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

2016-03-04 Thread Yannick Perret
heavy load from one server you could fall onto the other one. Our purpose is really to reduce bandwidth beetween buildings when possible, not to use the faster server :) -- Y. -Krutika *From: *"Yannick Perre

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

2016-03-04 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 03/03/2016 15:17, Saravanakumar Arumugam a écrit : On 03/03/2016 05:38 PM, Yannick Perret wrote: Hello, I can't find if it is possible to set a prefered server on a per-client basis for replica volumes, so I ask the question here. The context: we have 2 storage servers, each in one

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

2016-03-03 Thread Yannick Perret
: *"Yannick Perret" <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr> *To: *"Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com> *Cc: *gluster-users@gluster.org *Sent: *Thursday, March 3, 2016 7:23:09 PM *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server? Le 03/03/2016

Re: [Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

2016-03-03 Thread Yannick Perret
. Machines in the other building are rooted via some more equipments. -- Y. -Krutika *From: *"Yannick Perret" <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr> *To: *gluster-users@gluster.org *Sent: *Thursday, March 3, 20

[Gluster-users] Per-client prefered server?

2016-03-03 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, I can't find if it is possible to set a prefered server on a per-client basis for replica volumes, so I ask the question here. The context: we have 2 storage servers, each in one building. We also have several virtual machines on each building, and they can migrate from one building

[Gluster-users] Instable server with server/server encryption

2015-12-07 Thread Yannick Perret
Hello, I'm having problems with glusterfs and server/server encryption. I have 2 servers (sto1 & sto2) with latest stable version (3.6.7-1 from gluster repo) on Debian 8.2 (amd64), with one single volume with replication. Without /var/lib/glusterd/secure-access all works as expected. Then

Re: [Gluster-users] Instable server with server/server encryption

2015-12-07 Thread Yannick Perret
Le 07/12/2015 11:32, Kaushal M a écrit : On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Yannick Perret <yannick.per...@liris.cnrs.fr> wrote: Hello, I'm having problems with glusterfs and server/server encryption. I have 2 servers (sto1 & sto2) with latest stable version (3.6.7-1 from gluster repo)