t...@gmplib.org (Torbjörn Granlund) writes:
> Target operands which are not also input operands are now overwritten
> with garbage via the CLOBBER macro. (It would make sense to do this in
> almost every other GMP test file.)
>
> I split your gcdext check macros into 2-operand and 3-operand
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Marco Bodrato wrote:
The modified manual now says that "If @var{s}, @var{t} or @var{g} is
@code{NULL} then that value is not computed.", but g is computed anyway,
even if it is not returned...
The only change is that it is about g, s and t instead of just t. But that
was
Ciao,
Il Ven, 2 Dicembre 2016 11:50 pm, Torbjörn Granlund ha scritto:
> Target operands which are not also input operands are now overwritten
> with garbage via the CLOBBER macro. (It would make sense to do this in
> almost every other GMP test file.)
I like the macro.
> I split your gcdext
Ciao,
Il Ven, 25 Novembre 2016 2:11 pm, Marc Glisse ha scritto:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Niels Möller wrote:
>
>> Marc Glisse writes:
>>> a user was asking if we could support calling mpz_gcd_ext with a NULL
>>> first argument (the gcd), since they are only interested in the
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> Shouldn't res1, res2, res3 be overwritten with some fixed garbage when
> they are not also input operands?
This remains to do, as well as updating the corresponding mini-gmp test.
I made additional changes.
Target operands which are not
t...@gmplib.org (Torbjörn Granlund) writes:
> Please check code spacing and . vs , in comments.
Done and checked in.
> Shouldn't res1, res2, res3 be overwritten with some fixed garbage when
> they are not also input operands?
This remains to do, as well as updating the corresponding mini-gmp
"Marco Bodrato" writes:
I hope I did it correctly.
The testing run from last night seems happy.
I needed to make fairly large changes to the configure stuff for arm
since the old code caused problems for several CPUs. I merged the
needed changes from the head
On 2016-12-02 12:18:25 +0100, Wolf Lammen wrote:
> Gesendet: Freitag, 02. Dezember 2016 um 01:30 Uhr
> Von: "Vincent Lefevre"
> An: "Nelson H. F. Beebe"
> Cc: gmp-devel@gmplib.org
> Betreff: Re: Help stabilising mini-gmp
[...]
> > I'm not talking about a
Gesendet: Freitag, 02. Dezember 2016 um 01:30 Uhr
Von: "Vincent Lefevre"
An: "Nelson H. F. Beebe"
Cc: gmp-devel@gmplib.org
Betreff: Re: Help stabilising mini-gmp
On 2016-12-01 16:42:39 -0700, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre
Vincent clarifies about my response on about zero shift counts:
>> ...
>> I'm not talking about a zero shift count, but a shift of the value 0
>> with an arbitrary shift count, e.g. (uint64_t) 0 << 64. This is
>> undefined behavior, but I wonder why. When mapped to a hardware
>> instruction, does
10 matches
Mail list logo