Re: [Gmsh] Newbie question

Gmsh is the mesher and a possible interface to other FEA software. It is fully interfaced with the Fe solftware Getdp in Onelab Maybe you should start having a look at the models in: http://onelab.info/wiki/ONELAB Regards, Ruth — Prof. Ruth V. Sabariego KU Leuven Dept. Electrical Engineering

Re: [Gmsh] Gmsh difficulty - Socket Listening issue

It looks as if the gmsh is not able to find the solver, by default getdp… I would just remove the defined Solver (right click for getting the option). When opening inductor.pro again, it will prompt for getting it back. HTH, otherwise give us a bit more information e.g. operative system and

Re: [Gmsh] Structured 2D mesh for structure more than 8 corners !

Transfinite surfaces have to be defined with only 4 points. The number of divisions have to be adapted accordingly. Try: Transfinite Line {2}=5; Transfinite Line {6}=6; Transfinite Line {8}= (5+6+6*2+2)-5+1; Transfinite Line {7}= 11; Transfinite Line {1}= 11; Transfinite Line {3,5} =6;

Re: [Gmsh] GMSH Linux32bit updates

Hi! You can get official gmsh binary files for linux at: http://gmsh.info/bin/Linux/ Regards, Ruth Sabariego — Prof. Ruth V. Sabariego KU Leuven Dept. Electrical Engineering ESAT/Electa, EnergyVille http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/electa http://www.energyville.be Free software: http://gmsh.info |

Re: [Gmsh] Missing surfaces in mesh when using Boolean operators

Hi Isabela, You may use BooleanFragments instead of BooleanDifference. That seems to work: Try the following at the end of your file: /* voxcyl() = BooleanDifference{Volume{v};}{Volume{union19()}; Delete;}; //Physical Volume(0) = {voxcyl()}; */ // --- Definition of Final Volume

Re: [Gmsh] Create a 3D cube with each face having a physical surface

Using your second option, you may use BooleanFragments. Try at the end of your file: // Surface{7,8,9,10,11,12} In Volume{1}; // Comment out this line Physical Volume(100) = {1}; aux() = BooleanFragments{ Volume{1}; Delete; }{ Surface{7:12}; Delete;}; Printf("", aux()); // For checking the

Re: [Gmsh] Question about Progression and Bump

Dear Nathan, As you have noticed, the Bump does not do a double geometrical progression. The formula used is a bit more complicated, you can see what it actually does in the code (meshGEdge.cpp). A double progression is not (yet?) available. Work around by dividing your second region in two?

Re: [Gmsh] command line options

You can get all the available options by typing in the command line: gmsh -—help 2D mesh => -2 3D mesh => -3 gmsh -smooth number_steps gmsh -optimize Best, Ruth On 21 Sep 2018, at 14:47, Alessandro Vicini mailto:alessandro.vic...@sitael.com>> wrote: I usually work interactively, and I go

Re: [Gmsh] Gmsh with petsc/slepc 3.10?

Hi Christophe, My Gmsh version (from git, up to date) is compiled (today!) with petsc-3.10.1 and slepc-3.10.0 without any problem petsc and slepc (both compiled in October 2018) Best, Ruth — Prof. Ruth V. Sabariego KU Leuven Dept. Electrical Engineering ESAT/Electa, EnergyVille

Re: [Gmsh] R: R: R: ellipsoid issue

No issues with my up to date and freshly compiled version (4.5.0-git-3284474ec) under MacOS 10.14.6. My local version of OCC seems to be older 7.1.0. Ruth — Prof. Ruth V. Sabariego KU Leuven, Dept. Electrical Engineering ESAT/Electa, EnergyVille http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/electa

Re: [Gmsh] bad orientation

Dear all, I am not familiar with FreeFEM++... The mesh generation happens without any issue. If the problem is the normal orientation, maybe you could invert the normal at the end of the geo file, for whatever surface you want. e.g. with the file you sent, for having outward normals in the mesh