Hello Justin,
In your membrane protein simulation tutorial after making the topology, you
have mentioned that Placing the new gromos53a6_lipid.ff directory in
$GMXLIB will allow you to use this force field system-wide. I suppose this
is valid only for the proteins (and not membranes) to be
I attempted to do a restart of an aborted mpirun 4.5.4 simulation
with -deffnm but no explicit -cpi. However, the simulation did not restart
from the checkpoint but started from 0. Is this a known issue? Do restarts
require explicit -cpi flag? (since the workflow I use to extend a run
using
email message attachment
Forwarded Message
From: Nikos Papadimitriou nik...@ipta.demokritos.gr
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Gromacs 4.5.4 on multi-node cluster
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:26:46 +0200
Dear All,
I had been running Gromacs
On 2011-12-08 02:43:13AM -0600, Anirban Ghosh wrote:
Hello Justin,
In your membrane protein simulation tutorial after making the topology, you
have mentioned that Placing the new gromos53a6_lipid.ff directory in $GMXLIB
will allow you to use this force field system-wide. I suppose this is
Hi.
This is openmpi related.
Probably you have active the virbr0 interface with IP 192.168.122.1 on
nodes.
Stop and disable the libvirtd (and probably libvirt-guests) service if
you don't need it.
Alternatively,
1. add --mca btl_tcp_if_exclude lo,virbr0 in mpirun flags
or
2. add in
Hello Peter,
Thanks a lot for clarifying my doubt!
I have got it right now.
Thanks,
Anirban
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Peter C. Lai p...@uab.edu wrote:
On 2011-12-08 02:43:13AM -0600, Anirban Ghosh wrote:
Hello Justin,
In your membrane protein simulation tutorial after making the
Dear GMX users,
Could someone give me some suggestions on how to set the BASENAME file in
the QMMM simulations using gromacs/orca? Is the BASENAME file the inp file
in orca? Thanks very much!
Best Regards,
Qinghua
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
Hi,
I try to simulate DNA or better parts of a long DNA double-helix.
Therefore, the system I use is not correctly terminated at the ends
from chemical point of view with OH-groups but rather cut out the longer
helix. Nevertheless, all residues are named correctly, all atoms needed
in the
Dear Qinghua,
Yes indeed. It's what you give in the ORCA input file, but without the
coordinates, charge, multiplicity, and the Opt or EnGrad keyword.
Hope that helps,
Christoph
On 12/08/2011 11:43 AM, Qinghua Liao wrote:
Dear GMX users,
Could someone give me some suggestions on how to set
Peter C. Lai wrote:
I attempted to do a restart of an aborted mpirun 4.5.4 simulation
with -deffnm but no explicit -cpi. However, the simulation did not restart
from the checkpoint but started from 0. Is this a known issue? Do restarts
require explicit -cpi flag? (since the workflow I use to
On 8/12/2011 9:40 PM, Matthias Ernst wrote:
Hi,
I try to simulate DNA or better parts of a long DNA double-helix.
Therefore, the system I use is not correctly terminated at the ends
from chemical point of view with OH-groups but rather cut out the
longer helix. Nevertheless, all residues are
On 8/12/2011 6:35 PM, aiswarya pawar wrote:
Hi users,
Am running the mdrun_mpi on cluster with the md.mdp parameters as-
; VARIOUS PREPROCESSING OPTIONS
title= Position Restrained Molecular Dynamics
; RUN CONTROL PARAMETERS
constraints = all-bonds
integrator = md
dt =
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.auwrote:
On 8/12/2011 2:54 PM, Chandan Choudhury wrote:
Thanks everyone for the responses. I should have framed my question much
more precisely. I am trying to use the template.c code of (gmx_4.0.7) and
within this, I want
On 9/12/2011 12:00 AM, Chandan Choudhury wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au wrote:
On 8/12/2011 2:54 PM, Chandan Choudhury wrote:
Thanks everyone for the responses. I should have framed my
question much
Hi gmx_users,
is there any tutorial for implicit solvent simulation available?
Thanks!
--
Gianluca Santoni,
Institut de Biologie Structurale
41 rue Horowitz
Grenoble
_
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See
Gianluca Santoni wrote:
Hi gmx_users,
is there any tutorial for implicit solvent simulation available?
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Tutorials
If it's not there, or Google can't find it, the answer is no.
-Justin
--
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D.
Hi Mark,
thanks for your reply.
[...]
It knows that termini have to be different from mid-chain residues.
[...]
That answers my question, I think. I wanted to ask if it's possible to
just use whatever residue name is given without detection ofend- or
midchain residues.
I guess you answer
Dear All
A PhD and Postdoc position are opening at our center. Following is the
advertisement. Starting data: as soon as possible.
–––
A PhD position (3 years) and a postdoctoral position (2+ years) in simulations
of membranes and membrane proteins are available at the
Hey,
On a general note, assuming the frame is read in as a t_trxframe
structure called frame, the box is accessible as frame.box and is a
matrix instance, which means it's a 3x3 array, containing the
triclinic box as a lower triangular matrix. If the code says
t_trxframe *frame somewhere, rather
On 9/12/2011 12:55 AM, Matthias Ernst wrote:
Hi Mark,
thanks for your reply.
[...]
It knows that termini have to be different from mid-chain residues.
[...]
That answers my question, I think. I wanted to ask if it's possible to
just use whatever residue name is given without detection
Forwarded Message
From: Nikos Papadimitriou nik...@ipta.demokritos.gr
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Gromacs 4.5.4 on multi-node cluster
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:44:36 +0200
Forwarded Message
From: Nikos Papadimitriou
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Gianluca Santoni
gianluca.sant...@ibs.fr wrote:
Hi gmx_users,
is there any tutorial for implicit solvent simulation available?
Hi,
I tried it few days ago.
1] pdb2gmx the water model choose none.
2] after editconf, go to energy minimization directly
* It's
Dear Christoph,
Thanks very much for your explanation. I will try to figure it out by
consulting the manual of orca. Thanks.
Best Regards,
qinghua
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:09:03 +0100
From: Christoph Riplinger c...@thch.uni-bonn.de
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] how to set the BASENAME in QMMM
lina wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Gianluca Santoni
gianluca.sant...@ibs.fr wrote:
Hi gmx_users,
is there any tutorial for implicit solvent simulation available?
Hi,
I tried it few days ago.
1] pdb2gmx the water model choose none.
2] after editconf, go to energy minimization
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
lina wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Gianluca Santoni
gianluca.sant...@ibs.fr wrote:
Hi gmx_users,
is there any tutorial for implicit solvent simulation available?
Hi,
I tried it few days ago.
1]
Hi Jose,
You're not the first one to follow the tutorial, it does state which
version to use (4.5, see introduction), and it does state how to fix the
topology: editing the file, adding the lines, using the appropriate names.
This tutorial is made to be read and to be thought over.
Of course
Dear Users,
Sorry for maybe naive question. I am new user of gmx.
I like to fix the positions of three atoms in three neighboring residues (not
connected) with respect to each other. These atoms are very close to each
others and van der waals interaction makes the distance larger after em.
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:38:58 -0500
From: Jose Borreguero borregu...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Newbie: How to modify the topology file after
addingions?
To: jalem...@vt.edu, Discussion list for GROMACS users
gmx-users@gromacs.org
Message-ID:
*Dear gmx-users,
I am trying to insert a custom residue (a phosphoserine) in Gromacs using
force field Amber ff99sb-ildn.
I created a new .rtp entry named SEP like this:*
[SEP]
[ atoms ]
NN -0.49370 1
HH0.30180 2
CA CT -0.23800
Alberto Arrigoni wrote:
*Dear gmx-users,
I am trying to insert a custom residue (a phosphoserine) in Gromacs
using force field Amber ff99sb-ildn.
I created a new .rtp entry named SEP like this:*
[SEP]
[ atoms ]
NN -0.49370 1
HH0.30180 2
Dear gromacs users,
Recently I stumbled over following paper:
T. Terakawa, T. Kameda, and S. Takada, On Easy Implementation of a Variant
of the Replica Exchange with Solute Tempering in GROMACS. Journal of
Computational Chemistry 32 (2011) 1228-1234.
The authors suggested an easy way to run this
Hi!
Thanks Mark for reply. When I calculated fractional diffusion constant from
mass weighted MSD of long simulation I get sth about 0.05. But when I do the
same for centre of mass, considering that MSD is expressed in nm^2, the result
is 1.35. When I look into xvg file MSD of centre of mass
Hi Jose,
The references to NA+ and CL- have been changed, you can reload the
page in your browser if you care to continue. Now I still think your
statement was rather rude and showing disrespect to the time I put in
the tutorial. Apart from the reference to NA/CL you're also factually
incorrect
Dear Tsjerk,
I never thought I was being rude, probably because I was upset at the time.
I apologize.
Unfortunately, I believe you'll get more of the same in the future if you
don't spend more time updating your page. Devilish details like Na or Na+
have no place in a tutorial. There will be
On 9/12/2011 5:37 AM, Sławomir Stachura wrote:
Hi!
Thanks Mark for reply. When I calculated fractional diffusion constant from
mass weighted MSD of long simulation I get sth about 0.05. But when I do the
same for centre of mass, considering that MSD is expressed in nm^2, the result
is 1.35.
I want to calculate the diffusion coefficient of a small polypeptide with
g_msd (see here
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Diffusion_Constant)
because of periodic boundary condition, when the peptide goes out of the
right side it comes in from left side, which leads to an artificial
On 9/12/2011 5:53 PM, Ruhollah Moussavi-Baygi wrote:
I want to calculate the diffusion coefficient of a small polypeptide
with g_msd (see here
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Diffusion_Constant)
because of periodic boundary condition, when the peptide goes out of
the right side
On 2011-12-09 08:34, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 9/12/2011 5:53 PM, Ruhollah Moussavi-Baygi wrote:
I want to calculate the diffusion coefficient of a small polypeptide
with g_msd (see here
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Diffusion_Constant)
because of periodic boundary condition, when
38 matches
Mail list logo