hello justin,
I got one more error, please help me out again.
I got the em.gro instead of confout.gro. I reached an area per lipid of ~52
Å2
for POPE bi layer.
Next i tried to add ions to the system after solvating with water. i get
the
following error.
Program grompp, VERSION 4.5.4
Source
On 10/08/2012 5:28 PM, leonines wrote:
hello justin,
I got one more error, please help me out again.
I got the em.gro instead of confout.gro. I reached an area per lipid of ~52
Å2
for POPE bi layer.
Next i tried to add ions to the system after solvating with water. i get
the
following
Dear Gromacs users,
I am currently looking for an empirical potential for pi stacking
interactions. Something like the Leonard Jones potential, or the Mayo
potential for hydrogen bonds. I was wondering if something like that
exists for pi stacking interactions?
I am not really looking for
On 8/10/12 12:57 AM, Bhavaniprasad.V wrote:
hello justin,
I got one more error, please help me out again.
I got the em.gro instead of confout.gro. I reached an area per lipid of ~52 Å2
for POPE bi layer.
Next i tried to add ions to the system after solvating with water. i get the
following
Dear Gromacs workers,
I will decide simulate the system of Hypoxanthine (which is rather similar to
Guanine) in water solvent.
as you know, for this molecule, the force field parameter is not defined in
Gromacs database. at this time, people advice contracting of *.itp file
for new molecule. but
On 8/10/12 7:14 AM, Mohammad Hossein Kowsari wrote:
Dear Gromacs workers,
I will decide simulate the system of Hypoxanthine (which is rather similar to
Guanine) in water solvent.
as you know, for this molecule, the force field parameter is not defined in
Gromacs database. at this time,
Hi All,
I have a question regards to PMF:
Consider we are sure one protein will bind to membrane after 100ns in MD run
and make a complex. Instead of pulling protein to membrane to calculate PMF,
can we start from last configuration of protein-membrane complex and pull
out protein to separate
On 8/10/12 11:18 AM, dariush wrote:
Hi All,
I have a question regards to PMF:
Consider we are sure one protein will bind to membrane after 100ns in MD run
and make a complex. Instead of pulling protein to membrane to calculate PMF,
can we start from last configuration of protein-membrane
Dear All,
I have been trying to perform simulation for a Protein and Ligand
complex. However, when I run genion, I get an error The solvent group
SOL is not continuous: index[37530=23341, index[3754]=23606.
I remember reading someone posting a similar problem and the solution
was provided,
On 8/10/12 1:05 PM, Ankita naithani wrote:
Dear All,
I have been trying to perform simulation for a Protein and Ligand
complex. However, when I run genion, I get an error The solvent group
SOL is not continuous: index[37530=23341, index[3754]=23606.
I remember reading someone posting a
Good morning,
I am trying to run an umbrella sampling simulation, my system is a complex of
two proteins. I have a couple of questions:
1. i don't know which is the purpose in defining the charge of each protein end
2. When i check the topol.itp file of the reference molecule i realized that it
On 8/10/12 1:14 PM, Paula Andrea Delgado Pinzon wrote:
Good morning,
I am trying to run an umbrella sampling simulation, my system is a complex of
two proteins. I have a couple of questions:
1. i don't know which is the purpose in defining the charge of each protein end
A net charge is a
Hi Justin,
Thank you for your response.
The co-ordinate file that you have mentioned. Is it the one obtained
after running pdb2gmx step or the one after running genbox step?
Also, I am putting few outputs for your referral..
My co-ordinate file after building topology and incorporating my
On 8/10/12 1:26 PM, Ankita naithani wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thank you for your response.
The co-ordinate file that you have mentioned. Is it the one obtained
after running pdb2gmx step or the one after running genbox step?
Also, I am putting few outputs for your referral..
My co-ordinate file
Hi Justin,
Thank you so much for your reply. It really helped me a lot.
I think I have managed to clear this step.
Thanks once again.
Best Wishes,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 8/10/12 1:26 PM, Ankita naithani wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thank you for
Dear Dr. Dallas Warren,
My protein is a protein-peptide complex. The residues I mentioned which moves
in a large scope is from the peptide, it is the last 3rd residue of the
peptide, a lysine.
I compared this lysine position with the other residue positions (including the
peptide binding
On 8/10/12 7:58 PM, Acoot Brett wrote:
Dear Dr. Dallas Warren,
My protein is a protein-peptide complex. The residues I mentioned which moves
in a large scope is from the peptide, it is the last 3rd residue of the
peptide, a lysine.
I compared this lysine position with the other residue
Dear Justin,
Can you explain to me what do you mean for trjconv -pbc mol -ur compact
followed by trjconv -center. Does it mean 2 steps command, with the first step
as trjconv -pbc mol -ur compact and the second step as trjconv -center? Or
can we merge it as a single step step?
Second, will
On 8/10/12 8:19 PM, Acoot Brett wrote:
Dear Justin,
Can you explain to me what do you mean for trjconv -pbc mol -ur compact followed by trjconv
-center. Does it mean 2 steps command, with the first step as trjconv -pbc mol -ur compact
and the second step as trjconv -center? Or can we merge
you have to submit 10X with different seed simulation to confirm your
results. 10ns is not converged for some simulation, you should also
extend it in nowadays timescale level.
Moreover, if you don't have biochemistry data to support your idea,
nobody will believe your results.
good luck
20 matches
Mail list logo