[gmx-users] Re: gmx-users Digest, Vol 106, Issue 62

2013-02-12 Thread neeru sharma
> > On 2/12/13 1:12 AM, neeru sharma wrote: > > Dear Gromacs Users, > > > > > > I have simulated a system of protein-ion complex. As a part of the > > analysis, I want to see whether there are any H-bonds or other > interactions > > between the active site residues and the water surrounding those >

[gmx-users] number denisty calculation

2013-02-12 Thread Rajalakshmi.C
hi all, i am trying to find the coordination number using the rdf between two chains in the system .my box contains two polymer chains with water molecules.i know integrating 4*pi*r*r*g(r)*rho between 0 to first minima of rdf will give coordination number .the first minima value i took from the rdf

Re: [gmx-users] installation

2013-02-12 Thread David Sáez
Thanks for your answer Justin. I followed your advice: When I type *$ source /usr/local/gromacs/bin/GMXRC* *$* Nothing happened, the prompt returns normally and no action is executed. Do you have any idea? On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 2/12/13 9:24 PM, David S

[gmx-users] Need advice on appending aa residues to the sequence

2013-02-12 Thread zugunder
Hi, I am sorry if this topic is not relevant for GROMACS forum, but I hope someone has faced the same problem before and could give me some advice... I need to simulate a relatively short protein (170aa) in water. No structures are available for it, so I used a Modeller web server to get some. Un

Re: [gmx-users] installation

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 9:24 PM, David Sáez wrote: Hello everybody, I'm trying to install Gromacs 4.6 in my Ubuntu 12.04 laptop. As I am not a a skilled user, I tried the Quick and Dirty Installation, After following the instructions I obtained this message when trying to execute GMXRC: david@HAL-9000:~$ /

[gmx-users] installation

2013-02-12 Thread David Sáez
Hello everybody, I'm trying to install Gromacs 4.6 in my Ubuntu 12.04 laptop. As I am not a a skilled user, I tried the Quick and Dirty Installation, After following the instructions I obtained this message when trying to execute GMXRC: david@HAL-9000:~$ /usr/local/gromacs/bin/GMXRC /usr/local/gro

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Error: The Y-size of the box times the triclinic skew factor is smaller than the number of DD cells times the smallest allowed cell size

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 5:44 PM, Sonia Aguilera wrote: Thank you Justin, So, your advice is not to perform the npt calculation and to run the md after the nvt? A common mistake is to think that there is a "standard" protocol that one must follow. While it is true that for the condensed phase, a common

[gmx-users] Re: Error: The Y-size of the box times the triclinic skew factor is smaller than the number of DD cells times the smallest allowed cell size

2013-02-12 Thread Sonia Aguilera
Thank you Justin, So, your advice is not to perform the npt calculation and to run the md after the nvt? Thank you, Sonia Aguilera -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/Error-The-Y-size-of-the-box-times-the-triclinic-skew-factor-is-smaller-than-the-number-of-DD

Re: [gmx-users] Error: The Y-size of the box times the triclinic skew factor is smaller than the number of DD cells times the smallest allowed cell size

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 5:24 PM, Sonia Aguilera wrote: Hi, I was performing a NPT calculation, and I got this error: The Y-size of the box (6.002812) times the triclinic skew factor (1.00) is smaller than the number of DD cells (6) times the smallest allowed cell size (1.000605) I also tried to chang

[gmx-users] Error: The Y-size of the box times the triclinic skew factor is smaller than the number of DD cells times the smallest allowed cell size

2013-02-12 Thread Sonia Aguilera
Hi, I was performing a NPT calculation, and I got this error: The Y-size of the box (6.002812) times the triclinic skew factor (1.00) is smaller than the number of DD cells (6) times the smallest allowed cell size (1.000605) I also tried to change the number of processors but I got the same

Re: [gmx-users] error in md.log files

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 10:29 AM, vidhya sankar wrote: Dear Justin Thank you for your reply, I have set the Restraint Along the Z Axis . as follows #ifdef POSRES_WATER ; Position restraint for each water oxygen [ position_restraints ] i funct fcxfcyfcz 1

Re: [gmx-users] different springs - WHAM

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 9:57 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 2/12/13 9:40 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I know it is possible to combine windows with different spring constants into the one PMF curve using g_wham. Do I have to somehow te

Re: [gmx-users] Re: what do Coul-SR, LJ-SR, Coul-14 and LJ-14 mean in g_energy

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 11:06 AM, escajarro wrote: Hello all, I am afraid that, after reading all the documentation I could find about Coul-SR and LJ-SR, I still do not understand what these terms account for. I am running a simulation of one single polymer chain in water. My values for cut-off radious ar

Re: [gmx-users] Intra-protein hydrophobic contacts

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 11:29 AM, Kavyashree M wrote: Dear Users, How can intra-protein hydrophobic contacts be found for a trajectory. Most of the mails regarding this in the list is regarding hydrophobic contacts between chains or ligand and protein. So kindly help. Create a group of hydrophobic atoms

[gmx-users] Re: what do Coul-SR, LJ-SR, Coul-14 and LJ-14 mean in g_energy

2013-02-12 Thread escajarro
Hello all, I am afraid that, after reading all the documentation I could find about Coul-SR and LJ-SR, I still do not understand what these terms account for. I am running a simulation of one single polymer chain in water. My values for cut-off radious are rlist=rcoulomb=rvdw=1.5, I am using PME

[gmx-users] error in md.log files

2013-02-12 Thread vidhya sankar
Dear Justin Thank you for your reply,   I have set the Restraint  Along the Z Axis .  as follows #ifdef POSRES_WATER  ; Position restraint for each water oxygen   [ position_restraints ]       i  funct      fcx        fcy        fcz       1    1        0          0      100   #endif A

Re: [gmx-users] different springs - WHAM

2013-02-12 Thread Steven Neumann
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 2/12/13 9:40 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: >> >> Dear Gmx Users, >> >> I know it is possible to combine windows with different spring >> constants into the one PMF curve using g_wham. >> >> Do I have to somehow tell g_wham that one or two

Re: [gmx-users] different springs - WHAM

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 9:40 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Dear Gmx Users, I know it is possible to combine windows with different spring constants into the one PMF curve using g_wham. Do I have to somehow tell g_wham that one or two windows have different spring constants? No, they are read from the .tpr

Re: [gmx-users] can we schedule it?

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 9:45 AM, Albert wrote: Hello: I've got a question for setting of .mdp file for MD productions. The .trr file is really huge if we are going to run longer MD simulations. In this case, I usually only consider generate .xtc file, but the velocity is missed for all steps except the l

[gmx-users] can we schedule it?

2013-02-12 Thread Albert
Hello: I've got a question for setting of .mdp file for MD productions. The .trr file is really huge if we are going to run longer MD simulations. In this case, I usually only consider generate .xtc file, but the velocity is missed for all steps except the last one. So I am just wondering,

Re: [gmx-users] velocity was not present from trjconv

2013-02-12 Thread Albert
On 02/12/2013 03:33 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: gmxcheck is your friend, as well as the wiki. http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/File_Formats/Checkpoint_File A checkpoint file is always written at the last step of the simulation, which seems to be what you were asking for previously. -Just

Re: [gmx-users] velocity was not present from trjconv

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 9:32 AM, Albert wrote: On 02/12/2013 03:28 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: Extract it from the .cpt file that corresponds to that frame. -Justin thanks a lot for such helpful comments. I found that the md production produced two .cpt file: state.cpt state_prev.cpt I am not sure whic

Re: [gmx-users] velocity was not present from trjconv

2013-02-12 Thread Albert
On 02/12/2013 03:28 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: Extract it from the .cpt file that corresponds to that frame. -Justin thanks a lot for such helpful comments. I found that the md production produced two .cpt file: state.cpt state_prev.cpt I am not sure which one would be the one I need D

Re: [gmx-users] velocity was not present from trjconv

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 9:25 AM, Albert wrote: On 02/12/2013 03:19 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: Velocities are not stored in .xtc files. They are stored in .trr files, if nstvout != 0 in the .mdp file. -Justin Hi Justin: thanks for kind comments. I used the following settings and I didn't generate .trr

Re: [gmx-users] velocity was not present from trjconv

2013-02-12 Thread Albert
On 02/12/2013 03:19 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: Velocities are not stored in .xtc files. They are stored in .trr files, if nstvout != 0 in the .mdp file. -Justin Hi Justin: thanks for kind comments. I used the following settings and I didn't generate .trr file: nstxout= 0

Re: [gmx-users] velocity was not present from trjconv

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 9:17 AM, Albert wrote: Hello: I am using Gromacs4.6 and I extract one of my frame into .gro file by command: trjconv_mpi -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -dump 25000 -o md.gro I found that the velocity information was not present in this 25ns-md.gro file: Velocities are not stored in .xtc

[gmx-users] velocity was not present from trjconv

2013-02-12 Thread Albert
Hello: I am using Gromacs4.6 and I extract one of my frame into .gro file by command: trjconv_mpi -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -dump 25000 -o md.gro I found that the velocity information was not present in this 25ns-md.gro file: Generated by trjconv : Protein t= 25000.0 54178 1TYR N

Re: [gmx-users] Re: additional bond description (isopeptide bond) between two chains

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 8:37 AM, durdagis wrote: Justin, it's not the artifacts of visualization program. At the beginning distance for isopeptide bond is 1.38 Angs (and it's defined at the specbond.dat); LYS NZ 1 GLY C 1 0.13LYQ GLQ together with energy minimization thi

[gmx-users] Re: additional bond description (isopeptide bond) between two chains

2013-02-12 Thread durdagis
Justin, it's not the artifacts of visualization program. At the beginning distance for isopeptide bond is 1.38 Angs (and it's defined at the specbond.dat); LYS NZ 1 GLY C 1 0.13LYQ GLQ together with energy minimization this distance increases to around 3.0 Angs

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Reference structure for PCA.

2013-02-12 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hey Ahmet, 1/(N-1) sum (x-mean)(x-mean)' is the unbiased estimator of the true (population) covariance matrix, provided the observations are mutually independent (!) In most cases, N is quite large, so it doesn't actually matter, and the eigenvectors and order (not size) of the eigenvalues are i

Re: [gmx-users] Water mediated H-bonds

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 1:12 AM, neeru sharma wrote: Dear Gromacs Users, I have simulated a system of protein-ion complex. As a part of the analysis, I want to see whether there are any H-bonds or other interactions between the active site residues and the water surrounding those residues. I was trying to

Re: [gmx-users] additional bond description (isopeptide bond) between two chains

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 3:30 AM, durdagis wrote: Hello all, I have an isopeptide bond (between Lys site chain and carboxyl terminal of Gly) in my system and I defined this with specbond.dat and additional residue types and I edited .rtp files using Amber ff. Although I have this bond at the beginning (befo

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-12 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/12/13 6:19 AM, Abhishek Acharya wrote: Hello Justin. Help would really be appreciated. And yes you are correct and i thought the same. Initially I tried using opls_345B but it didn't work. In fact if I use opls_345B it gives me an additional error. Anyhow here are the relevant files. topol

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Reference structure for PCA.

2013-02-12 Thread Ahmet yıldırım
Hi, S = 1/N sum (x - ref) (x - ref)' or S = 1/(N-1) sum (x - ref) (x - ref)' N: the number of frames Which one is right? 2013/2/12 Tsjerk Wassenaar > Hi Vivek, > > If you use the g_covar option -ref, you not only use the reference > structure for fitting, you use it for calculating the devi

Re: [gmx-users] Removing errors related to missing dihedrals.

2013-02-12 Thread Abhishek Acharya
Hello Justin. Help would really be appreciated. And yes you are correct and i thought the same. Initially I tried using opls_345B but it didn't work. In fact if I use opls_345B it gives me an additional error. Anyhow here are the relevant files. topology file: # [atoms] 15 ; nr type re

[gmx-users] additional bond description (isopeptide bond) between two chains

2013-02-12 Thread durdagis
Hello all, I have an isopeptide bond (between Lys site chain and carboxyl terminal of Gly) in my system and I defined this with specbond.dat and additional residue types and I edited .rtp files using Amber ff. Although I have this bond at the beginning (before pdb2gmx), it looks I need to add addi

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Reference structure for PCA.

2013-02-12 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Vivek, If you use the g_covar option -ref, you not only use the reference structure for fitting, you use it for calculating the deviations. Your covariance matrix is built as: S = 1/N sum (x - ref) (x - ref)' If you leave out the option -ref then the average structure will be used for the cov

[gmx-users] Re: Problem with dihedral restraint in gromacs 4.6

2013-02-12 Thread Landraille
Last question (I hope). How can I choose the force constant? Indeed for the version 4.5, the force constant is defined by the option dihre_fc in the mdp input file. After this force is multiply by kfac contained in the dihedral_sections in the topology file Now this option is obsolete. The f

[gmx-users] Re: Reference structure for PCA.

2013-02-12 Thread vivek modi
> > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:32:15 + (WET) > From: bapti...@itqb.unl.pt > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Reference structure for PCA. > To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > Message-ID: > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > Hello Antonio, Thank you very m