HI
I'm simulating gold-protein interaction by gromacs. after MD simulation I want
to calculate interaction energy of each aminoacids with
AU surface.
Enon-bond = E(vdw) + E(elec)
gold atoms charge in simulation were considered 0, then E non-bonded=E(vdw)
Is this true?
The interaction
Dear users
I have a question regarding the cube file output we get from g_spatial
analysis. My system comprises of hundreds of ionic liquids (composed of
cation and anion). If I would like to see the spatial distribution of
anions around cation, how do I get an average distribution. E.g, the way
Hi. I'm trying to build a build with cmake-2.8.10.2-linux for
'gromacs-4.6.1' as the build target.
First,
I extracted gromacs-4.6.1.tar.gz and, create a new folder; build inside
the extracted folder.
Then, inside build folder, I configured using CMake.
$ tar -xvzf gromacs-4.6.1.tar.gz
$ cd
Dear all,
I want to reverse transform my CG lipid system to AA. I have been using
g_fg2cg but I am getting some errors (like Atoms in the .top are not
numbered consecutively from 1). So, I intend to use the script
top2psf.plwritten by Dr.Lemkul, so that I can avail the help of VMD in
cg2aa
On 4/18/13 2:00 AM, fatemeh ramezani wrote:
HI
I'm simulating gold-protein interaction by gromacs. after MD simulation I want
to calculate interaction energy of each aminoacids with
AU surface.
Enon-bond = E(vdw) + E(elec)
gold atoms charge in simulation were considered 0, then E
On 4/18/13 3:09 AM, 中野佑香 wrote:
Hi. I'm trying to build a build with cmake-2.8.10.2-linux for
'gromacs-4.6.1' as the build target.
First,
I extracted gromacs-4.6.1.tar.gz and, create a new folder; build inside
the extracted folder.
Then, inside build folder, I configured using CMake.
$
On 4/18/13 5:15 AM, Venkat Reddy wrote:
Dear all,
I want to reverse transform my CG lipid system to AA. I have been using
g_fg2cg but I am getting some errors (like Atoms in the .top are not
numbered consecutively from 1). So, I intend to use the script
top2psf.plwritten by Dr.Lemkul, so that
Greetings,
I am simulating a box of TIP5P waters and I would like to know if it is
possible to change the standard LJ potential function to a more complex one
(LJ-Gauss), while keeping the coulombic interaction standard. The custom
potential will act between the oxygen atoms only and has the
On 4/18/13 7:31 AM, Andrish Reddy wrote:
Greetings,
I am simulating a box of TIP5P waters and I would like to know if it is
possible to change the standard LJ potential function to a more complex one
(LJ-Gauss), while keeping the coulombic interaction standard. The custom
potential will
Dear Justin,
Thank you for your fast reply.
cmake was successfully worked after I removed CMakeCache.txt from
gromacs-**4.6.1
directory and
corrected CMake path in .tcshrc .
Thank you!
-Yuka
2013/4/18 Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
On 4/18/13 3:09 AM, 中野佑香 wrote:
Hi. I'm trying to
Thanks Justin,
I had a look at the manual regarding tabulated potentials... for clarity,
The table values must contain: x, f(x), −f(x), g(x), −g(x), h(x), −h(x).
For my function then would f(x) = 1/r g(x) = eps*[(sig/r)^12 -
2*(sig/r)^6]
and h(x) = -epsG*[exp-(((r-rG)^2) / (2*sigG^2))] ?
Dear Gmx,
Is there anyway I can run simulation using mpirun command via rsh? I am using
openmpi 1.6 version.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
Dear Gromacs users,
I have runned a semiisotropic NPT simulation for a membrane, I have fixed
the pressure in x and y axis and I varied it only in z axis to keep a
stable interface. But after simulation the obtained interfacial tension is
far bigger than the experimental value. Experimental is 27
Dear all
I'm trying to start a simulation with a protein embedded in a bilayer of
POPC molecules, but I have some problems when I pack the lipids around the
protein. Infact I place the protein in the proper position using the
editconf tool with the “-rotate” and “-center” options on, but when
Dear gmx,
I m having a confusion of using the literature value of non-bonded ( charmm
format) to use in gromacs over charmm27.ff ?
For example, the literature reported the Carbon nonbonded as ( sigma =3.83,
epsilon -0.0262 ), whereas the charmm27.ff in gromacs- ffnonbonded value listed
for
Thanks for the reply, so the next question, after I finish building single
precision non parallel, is there an efficient way to kick off the double
precision build, then the single precision mpi and so on?
Or do I need to delete everything from my build directory before running cmake
again?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Mike Hanby mha...@uab.edu wrote:
Thanks for the reply, so the next question, after I finish building single
precision non parallel, is there an efficient way to kick off the double
precision build, then the single precision mpi and so on?
Or do I need to
On 4/18/13 8:44 AM, Andrish Reddy wrote:
Thanks Justin,
I had a look at the manual regarding tabulated potentials... for clarity,
The table values must contain: x, f(x), −f(x), g(x), −g(x), h(x), −h(x).
For my function then would f(x) = 1/r g(x) = eps*[(sig/r)^12 -
2*(sig/r)^6]
and h(x) =
On 4/18/13 10:51 AM, Souilem Safa wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I have runned a semiisotropic NPT simulation for a membrane, I have fixed
the pressure in x and y axis and I varied it only in z axis to keep a
stable interface. But after simulation the obtained interfacial tension is
far bigger
On 4/18/13 10:59 AM, Giuseppe wrote:
Dear all
I'm trying to start a simulation with a protein embedded in a bilayer of
POPC molecules, but I have some problems when I pack the lipids around the
protein. Infact I place the protein in the proper position using the
editconf tool with the
Dear all.
I'm trying to estimate relative solvation enegry of brombenzene (relative
to benzene) via thermodynamic integration. Can I perform such calculation
in GROMACS with GPU acceleration?
As I currently understand to make use of GPU one need to use Verlet cutoff
scheme. When I do so with pme
On 4/18/13 2:30 PM, Олег Титов wrote:
Dear all.
I'm trying to estimate relative solvation enegry of brombenzene (relative
to benzene) via thermodynamic integration. Can I perform such calculation
in GROMACS with GPU acceleration?
As I currently understand to make use of GPU one need to use
Identify the equations into which they are inserted. Apply scaling
parameters to change the units. Learn to check others' work before
investing months of effort ;-)
Mark
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, 라지브간디 ra...@kaist.ac.kr wrote:
Dear gmx,
I m having a confusion of using the literature
Chapter 8 is your friend. Find a tool to feed data to g_analyze.
Mark
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Steven Neumann s.neuman...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear Users,
Could you advise me please how to calculate vector C-N autocorrelation
function in my protein along the simulation time?
Steven
No idea. Configuring your MPI system is not really on topic for the GROMACS
mailing list. I suggest you read your OpenMPI documentation.
Mark
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:58 PM, 라지브간디 ra...@kaist.ac.kr wrote:
Dear Gmx,
Is there anyway I can run simulation using mpirun command via rsh? I am
Hi,
I'm not clear on how to use pdb2gmx to set up a small molecule for
simulation, or perhaps the limitations on this capability. My understanding
from the latest documentation and the 2013 publication is that v4.5 is capable
of handling non-protein/nucleic acid as input.
I
On 4/18/13 3:32 PM, Warren Gallin wrote:
Hi,
I'm not clear on how to use pdb2gmx to set up a small molecule for
simulation, or perhaps the limitations on this capability. My understanding
from the latest documentation and the 2013 publication is that v4.5 is capable
of handling
On 2013-04-18 21:35, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 4/18/13 3:32 PM, Warren Gallin wrote:
Hi,
I'm not clear on how to use pdb2gmx to set up a small molecule for
simulation, or perhaps the limitations on this capability. My
understanding from the latest documentation and the 2013 publication
is
Greetings all,
I wanted to announce that we have released version 2.0 of GridMAT-MD. Many of
you use this program for membrane analysis and I am pleased to note that we have
introduced many new features based on your feedback, including trajectory
support (multi-frame .pdb and .gro files).
Dear All
I am new to GROMACS, I have the following question:
What is the difference between Pres. DC and Pressure in g_energy analysis ?
Thanks in advance
Venkatesh
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the
On 4/18/13 7:22 PM, Venkatesh Ramakrishnan wrote:
Dear All
I am new to GROMACS, I have the following question:
What is the difference between Pres. DC and Pressure in g_energy analysis ?
Pres. DC is the correction applied to the pressure term in dispersion
correction when using DispCorr
Hello,
I have a 2 tpr files which are identical. Then I am doing a single step MD
(I put n_step=0) simulation just to compute the total energy of a certain
configuration.
These tpr files give me different energy values ... when I run it on my
computer or on another computer. Even the gromacs
It seems to be good. However, I always have problem to compile matpack
which is needed by xmatrix... I sent the author an email, but never
replied..
here is the log file:
creating libpng12.la
(cd .libs rm -f libpng12.la ln -s ../libpng12.la libpng12.la)
make[4]: Leaving directory
33 matches
Mail list logo