Re: [gmx-users] GROMACS vs. AMBER speed comparison?

Thank you for the good reference. ^^ On 8/14/07, Tsjerk Wassenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JCTC December 2005, IIRC :-) YDRC...: JCC 26: 1701-1718 (December 2005) :p Tsjerk Mark ___ gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org

Re: [gmx-users] GROMACS vs. AMBER speed comparison?

Hi Seungpyo Hong, Hi, gmx-users, Recently I have try to use AMBER 9 for the simulation of protein with about 300 residues. Surprisingly, I found that AMBER is far slower than GROMACS; GROMACS is about twice faster. I can not figure out the reason. Why is GROMACS faster than AMBER? Could

Re: [gmx-users] GROMACS vs. AMBER speed comparison?

Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote: Hi Seungpyo Hong, Hi, gmx-users, Recently I have try to use AMBER 9 for the simulation of protein with about 300 residues. Surprisingly, I found that AMBER is far slower than GROMACS; GROMACS is about twice faster. I can not figure out the reason. Why is GROMACS faster

Re: [gmx-users] GROMACS vs. AMBER speed comparison?

It is found on Gromacs' website http://www.gromacs.org/content/view/12/176/ Regards, Yang Ye - Original Message From: SeungPyo Hong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 9:12:47 PM Subject: [gmx-users] GROMACS vs. AMBER speed comparison? Hi, gmx