On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:28:46AM +0800, fxzhang wrote:
Wifi is not enabled by default because it consumes significant power and
is not always used.
I'd rather live with that than having to implement the daemon hack as
workaround.
Could you provide some indication on how can this be
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:28:46 +0800, fxzhang fxzh...@ict.ac.cn wrote:
Wifi is not enabled by default because it consumes significant power and
is not always used.
Wu Zhangjin 写道:
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 13:38 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
[..]
So the problem with wireless is that it
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:30:44PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
On 12:53 Sun 01 Nov , Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:16:04PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
On 22:43 Mon 26 Oct , Robert Millan wrote:
Hi, Robert
Could you please compile rtl8187b into the kernel(2.6.30.9), not just
as a module.
Just checked it, if as module, Fn+F5 will not work, but the interface
/sys/class/rfkill/rfkill0/state works! This means the relative kernel
handling is broken(not really broken). but if you really want
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 07:53:54PM +0800, wu zhangjin wrote:
Hi, Robert
Could you please compile rtl8187b into the kernel(2.6.30.9), not just
as a module.
Just checked it, if as module, Fn+F5 will not work, but the interface
/sys/class/rfkill/rfkill0/state works! This means the relative
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 13:38 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
[..]
So the problem with wireless is that it wasn't enabled?
So why not enable it by default then?
No, I'm not sure, Just want to ensure it is enabled and ensure the
kernel interface works and then find other problems.
and of
Wifi is not enabled by default because it consumes significant power and
is not always used.
Wu Zhangjin 写道:
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 13:38 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
[..]
So the problem with wireless is that it wasn't enabled?
So why not enable it by default then?
No, I'm not
On 22:43 Mon 26 Oct , Robert Millan wrote:
Try with the Linux 2.6.30.9 packages (see my other mail)
For those who are not aware of:
Actually, the wifi driver provided by realtek (the working one) has been
integrated into lemote's git tree for quite some time, at least two months.
Please
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:16:04PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
On 22:43 Mon 26 Oct , Robert Millan wrote:
Try with the Linux 2.6.30.9 packages (see my other mail)
For those who are not aware of:
Actually, the wifi driver provided by realtek (the working one) has been
integrated into
On 12:53 Sun 01 Nov , Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:16:04PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
On 22:43 Mon 26 Oct , Robert Millan wrote:
Try with the Linux 2.6.30.9 packages (see my other mail)
For those who are not aware of:
Actually, the wifi driver provided by
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:30:44PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
On 12:53 Sun 01 Nov , Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:16:04PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
On 22:43 Mon 26 Oct , Robert Millan wrote:
Try with the Linux 2.6.30.9 packages (see my other mail)
For those
Ted Smith schreef:
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 12:58 +, Frederique W. Piccart wrote:
The
solution? Keep reinstalling the base system until you end up in
situation
2
I am incredibly skeptical of any solution that consists in doing the
same thing over and over and anticipating different results.
Try with the Linux 2.6.30.9 packages (see my other mail)
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.
13 matches
Mail list logo
