On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> This year, I used an online service, http://www.taxactonline.com, to do my
> personal taxes. It worked just fine under Linux, and was quite cheap, too.
> (The tax calculations are actually "free"; they just charge to submit them
> electronically.)
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, at 6:29pm, Michael Bovee wrote:
> (I'm a born and raised Macintosh user so please bear with me) I bought a
> SAMS Teach Yourself book on Unix, but it says nothing about WHY this PATH
> thing is even necessary.
A typical Unix system might have a few hundred directories (fold
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, at 10:34pm, Jon 'maddog' Hall, Executive Director,...:
> Last fall we bought four tables worth of space ... We had too much room,
> so this year I would recommend two tables of space ...
I concur. We could, in fact, probably get away with just one, but it
would be a bit co
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, at 5:59pm, Bill Sconce wrote:
> Unfortunately, whenever you use proprietary software you accept a set of
> risks.
Here, here! Free Software is about Freedom!
> Win4Lin creates a DOS environment which is sufficiently authentic to
> convince Microsoft Windows(tm) 9x that it
Michael Bovee wrote:
> Okay, apologies in advance, but something I _just dont get_ is the PATH
> variable.
> (I'm a born and raised Macintosh user so please bear with me)
> I bought a SAMS Teach Yourself book on Unix, but it says nothing about
> WHY this PATH thing is even necessary. (Under
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Michael Bovee hath spake thusly:
> Okay, apologies in advance, but something I _just dont get_ is the
> PATH variable.
> (I'm a born and raised Macintosh user so please bear with me)
> I bought a SAMS Teach Yourself book on Un
Okay, apologies in advance, but something I _just dont get_ is the
PATH variable.
(I'm a born and raised Macintosh user so please bear with me)
I bought a SAMS Teach Yourself book on Unix, but it says nothing
about WHY this PATH thing is even necessary. (Under MacOS... if I
invoke the 'FIND' c
Introductory comment: I realize that April 15th is a special
day for many of us, and that a lot of folks may be spending
time working for an employer who doesn't pay them (the IRS).
I apologize for the timing, although perhaps a little diversion
might be welcome for some.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
> The first thing I'd like to do is have it append new entries to file
> as opposed to inserting them at the top. Any idea how to do this?
None whatsoever, but I'd like to offer a perspec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Does anyone here regularly use Emacs' changelog-mode? I'm playing
around with it a little, and I'd like to customize it some, but not
sure how or where to begin.
The first thing I'd like to do is have i
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 09:43, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know if there is any harm in deleteing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/* ? All of the pachages that I have ever
> installed are in there, and it's currently taking up about 1GB of
> space..
A cleaner option would be:
apt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In a message dated: 15 Apr 2002 09:43:13 EDT
"Kenneth E. Lussier" said:
>Does anyone know if there is any harm in deleteing
>/var/cache/apt/archives/* ? All of the pachages that I have ever
>installed are
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there is any harm in deleteing
/var/cache/apt/archives/* ? All of the pachages that I have ever
installed are in there, and it's currently taking up about 1GB of
space..
TIA,
Kenny
--
"Tact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Right, but if I don't have any of that thread in my mailbox, then
> regardless of whether my client can handle threading, there's nothing
> there for it to relate the new message to.
Yes.
Of course, people don't have to save every message in order for these
header
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In a message dated: 15 Apr 2002 08:31:06 EDT
Kevin D. Clark said:
>> Errr, would you have to have that original e-mail still floating
>> around in your mailbox somewhere for it to detect this?
>
>Yes.
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In a message dated: 12 Apr 2002 15:03:31 EDT
> Kevin D. Clark said:
>
> >OBTW, if you are looking at this email and your email program doesn't
> >easily let you determine that this message is somehow (vaguely)
> >related to Tom Rauschenbach's message on 25 Mar 2002 w
16 matches
Mail list logo
