Hi All,
Ximian has a little press about next weeks GNHLUG meeting today in the
Nashua Telegraph.
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/main.asp?FromHome=1&TypeID=1&SectionID=30&Art
icleID=59770&SubSectionID=90
It's nice to see.
FYI,
Alan
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-vir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, at 12:20pm, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > Missing from both right now, I think, is the ability to say that a
> > particular package is recommended, but not required (does
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, at 12:20pm, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> Missing from both right now, I think, is the ability to say that a
> particular package is recommended, but not required (does dpkg do this?)
Debian's system does do this. A package can be "Required", "Recommended",
or "Suggested". It i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Rich Payne hath spake thusly:
> RedHat user, both have their advatages and disadvantages and one of the
> advantages of Debian is that the packaging system is a little bit ahead of
> RedHat (nothing that can't be fixed with a
On 3 Jul 2002, at 11:43am, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> We have a couple RH boxes around here, one of which is 7.2. I tried doing
> exactly this, and it began to complain about missing some rpm rpms? I
> couldn't figure out how to fulfill the dependency?
That's odd. What RPMs was it complaining ab
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 18:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2 Jul 2002, at 2:24pm, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> > Step 1) apt-get update
> > Step 2) apt-get -u upgrade
>
> Well, Red Hat nicely provides the "up2date" utility, which does the same
> thing, in one less step:
>
> Step 1) up2date -u
We
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, at 9:12am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right, but RedHat still hasn't released the code to their up2date server
> right?
No, nor do they plan to. Red Hat considers their update server system to
be an intellectual property asset and a value-added service. However, the
up2da
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, at 8:42am, Rich Payne wrote:
> We do paint with a broad brush stroak don't we.
Yes, and I want to apologize for the tone of my messages in this thread
yesterday. While everything I said had a basis in real opinions and
experience, I went a little over the top with the sarca
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Ben Boulanger wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Rich Payne wrote:
> > OK then, show me how to point up2date at a different repository? Or better
> > yet how to setup my own up2date server. Yes, I'm a Debian user, I'm also a
> > RedHat user, both have their advatages and disadvant
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, at 7:37pm, Tom Rauschenbach wrote:
> > What GUI do you folks recommend. I'd rather not be trapped in KDE or
> > Gnome. Is there a standard/accepted GUI that C++ people write to ? Is
it
> > portable to Motif, KDE, Gnome ?
>
> KDE uses Qt, but Qt does not need KDE. Qt i
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Rich Payne wrote:
> OK then, show me how to point up2date at a different repository? Or better
> yet how to setup my own up2date server. Yes, I'm a Debian user, I'm also a
> RedHat user, both have their advatages and disadvantages and one of the
> advantages of Debian is tha
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2 Jul 2002, at 2:24pm, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> > Step 1) apt-get update
> > Step 2) apt-get -u upgrade
>
> Well, Red Hat nicely provides the "up2date" utility, which does the same
> thing, in one less step:
>
> Step 1) up2date -u
While up2dat
12 matches
Mail list logo
