OpenOffice auto raise mis-feature

2002-04-24 Thread Paul Iadonisi
Anybody else notice that OpenOffice (I'm running 6.41d) automatically raises itself when it gets focus? I have point-to-focus instead of click-to-focus under Gnome/Sawfish. Nothing else does this except that in older versions of galeon, some web sites would induce this behavior fro

Re: Documentation (was Re: OpenOffice)

2002-04-09 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 16:46, Derek D. Martin wrote: > > > Derek's issue here is that he hates writing documentation. No > > amount of technology is going to change that. :-) > > Actually I don't really mind writing documentation, though I certainly > don't love it. The real problem is that I

Re: Documentation (was Re: OpenOffice)

2002-04-09 Thread plussier
In a message dated: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 16:46:11 EDT "Derek D. Martin" said: >Paul L. will no doubt pipe up here with a "function over form" comment, >to which I generally would agree... But I'll also add that it doesn't >always matter how functional a thing is if you can't stand to look at >it.

Documentation (was Re: OpenOffice)

2002-04-09 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly: > > I found DocBook to be really easy. All I needed was ... > > You people are making a classic mistake, in not realizing what the > user (Derek, in this case) ) really means. Derek's a brig

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 15:46, Benjamin Scott wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, at 2:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> You're not missing much! It's a nice idea (if you live in > >>> TheoryLand :) but it's just way too complicated for lazy people > >>> to bother with! > >> > >> Hey! Them's fighting

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, at 2:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> You're not missing much! It's a nice idea (if you live in >>> TheoryLand :) but it's just way too complicated for lazy people >>> to bother with! >> >> Hey! Them's fighting words! The real problem is that ... > > I found DocBook to b

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread ccb
> > You're not missing much! It's a nice idea (if you live in > > TheoryLand :) but it's just way too complicated for lazy people to > > bother with! > Hey! Them's fighting words! The real problem is that it's way too > poorly documented, and is therefore better suited to people who have > t

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 14:15, Derek D. Martin wrote: > > There are a few newer GUI apps for editing DB, but no real WYSIWYG > > apps, as...well...DB was never meant to be WYSIWYG. > > Like? Morphon XML Editor (www.morphon.com) XMLmind XML Editor (http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/) Neither falls

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Mark Komarinski hath spake thusly: > DocBook is great because it separates out the authoring from the > presentation. Oh, I agree with the benefits of using it, I just find actually using it painful. > There are a few newer

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 13:08, Derek D. Martin wrote: > My experience with DocBook is that the only people who *want* to use > it are people who enjoy writing documentation, and they're all crazy > anyway... ;-) Last I checked (not very recent, but I believe still > accurate -- correct me please i

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Karl J. Runge
part. I don't > need either, so it doesn't bother me. (sorry I deleted the later posts) I believe Mark is referring to that in OpenOffice and Staroffice 6.0 the documents appear as separate toplevel X windows (e.g a new X window for each doc, presentation, spreadsheet, ...) rather

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Mark Komarinski hath spake thusly: > Depending on how large the document is, you may want to just use > DocBook and generate PDF. Then again, you can generate RTF (the > base of DOC) from DocBook as well. My experience with D

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Jerry Feldman
Nor does it on Linux. On 9 Apr 2002 at 11:16, David Andrew - Sun MDE wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just to correct a misunderstanding - Staroffice 5.2 does not take over > your desktop, at least not on Solaris or Windows. I have been using it > for well over a year as a separate window. You may ne

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread David Andrew - Sun MDE
at the time. Cheers, David - >Subject: Re: OpenOffice >From: "Kenneth E. Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Mark Komarinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: 09 Apr 2002 09:45:45 -0400 >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Re: Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 10:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On 09 Apr 2002 09:45:45 -0400 "Kenneth E. Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know much about DocBook. > > You're not missing much! It's a nice idea > (if you live in TheoryLand :) but it's just way too complicated for

Re: Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread plussier
On 09 Apr 2002 09:45:45 -0400 "Kenneth E. Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know much about DocBook. You're not missing much! It's a nice idea (if you live in TheoryLand :) but it's just way too complicated for lazy people to bother with! Stick with LyX, you can create PS, PDF,

Re: OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Mark Komarinski
well. -Mark On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 09:29, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote: > Hi All, > > Someone metioned getting a copy of OpenOffice the other day, so I was > curious. I currently use AbiWord and GnuMeric for most of my smaller > tasks, and when I have something larger, like a presentatio

OpenOffice

2002-04-09 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
Hi All, Someone metioned getting a copy of OpenOffice the other day, so I was curious. I currently use AbiWord and GnuMeric for most of my smaller tasks, and when I have something larger, like a presentation, or a large document that needs to go out to M$ Office users, I use StarOffice 5.2. If

Re: OpenOffice?

2002-03-27 Thread plussier
In a message dated: 27 Mar 2002 16:58:45 EST "Roger H. Goun" said: >I'll do it. But now I'm going to be late for dinner. :-) I'm all set, 'maddog' has volunteered to get me the CD, thanks for all the offers though, I really appreciate it! -- Seeya, Paul ***

Re: OpenOffice?

2002-03-27 Thread Roger H. Goun
the lasted Intel/Linux version of OpenOffice > D. Can burn it to CD? > E. Give it to me at the meeting :) > > On a 56K dial-up connection, the bandwidth of my car carrying a CD is much higher > than that of my poor 56K modem, even *with* all the latency :) > > Tha

OpenOffice?

2002-03-27 Thread plussier
Hi, Is there anyone who: A. is coming to the meeting tonight B. has a fast connection at home C. Could download the lasted Intel/Linux version of OpenOffice D. Can burn it to CD? E. Give it to me at the meeting :) On a 56K dial-up connection, the

Re: OpenOffice 6.0

2001-04-26 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:44:51 EDT Gregory Dake said: >Greetings- > >You might have chosen to install it without the help... try going back and >re-running the install script... their will be the option to "Modify >installation." From there you just navigate your way through the

OpenOffice 6.0

2001-04-18 Thread Paul Lussier
Hey, Anyone install OO6.0 yet? Anyone notice that there is no help? You can click on Help->Contents, but the window that pops up is completely empty. There doesn't even seem to be any documentation on the website?! -- Seeya, Paul It may look like I'm just sitting here doin