-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
> gzip does not extract files from a gzipped file. It simply
> decompresses the file. These files are all tar.gz files, which means
> that you must first decompress them, then un-archive
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:16:06 EDT
"Matthew S. Sacks" said:
>> ftp://mud.stack.nl/pub/OuterSpace/willem/
>>
>I have downloaded several .gz files from this site. gunzip will not
>unzip any of them. Yes, I did -d.
Ahm, are you sure? They all unzip for me just fine. Are y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, at 4:06pm, Matthew S. Sacks wrote:
>
>>The lspci command identifies the Multimedia audio controller as an Intel
>>Corp. 82801BA/BAM AC'97 (rev 05) (This may make sense if ADI chip has been
>>integrated onto a motherboard made by Intel)
>>
>
> FY
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:45:09 EDT
"Jerry Feldman" said:
>And SuSE:
>gaf@gaf-lap:~> uname -a
>Linux gaf-lap 2.4.18-4GB #1 Wed Mar 27 13:57:05 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
That's the old version of uname. You need to upgrade to 2.0.12 of
sh-utils.
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
It may loo
Brenda you might want to look at:
http://www.acmebw.com/askmrdns/
it's a neat site that has some simple amswers to DNS questions.
for in-addr.arpa delegation of domains smaller than a class "C", try a
search on "classless in-addr.arpa delegation"
HTH,
Bill
Brenda A. Bell wrote:
>Can someo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
>
> In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:56:20 EDT
> "Derek D. Martin" said:
>
> >The uname command is part of the sh-utils package, not util-linux. :)
>
> Unless your on Debian, in w
And SuSE:
gaf@gaf-lap:~> uname -a
Linux gaf-lap 2.4.18-4GB #1 Wed Mar 27 13:57:05 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
On 15 Aug 2002 at 15:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:54:16 EDT
> "Derek D. Martin" said:
>
> >While I very much agree with you, I'm a bit surprised t
One of our members (BLU) is a former Verizon employee. He once arranged an
Installfest at Verizon (formerly Bell Titanic formerly Nynex formerly New
England Telephone). He tells me that up here they are all mainframe
oriented, and a PC is nothing more than a 3270 terminal emulator.
On 15 Aug 2
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:56:20 EDT
"Derek D. Martin" said:
>The uname command is part of the sh-utils package, not util-linux. :)
Unless your on Debian, in which case it's shellutils :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:54:16 EDT
"Derek D. Martin" said:
>While I very much agree with you, I'm a bit surprised to hear you
>argue this. The GNU Project seems to be giving you what you've always
>wanted: a way for uname to identify what distribution you're using,
>distinct from
...and from my very current Debian "testing" box we get:
> shrapnel:~/.mail/inbox 744---> uname --version
> uname (sh-utils) 2.0.12
> Written by David MacKenzie.
>
> Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. Ther
"Derek D. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
kindly pointed out how stupid I am - I mean, I knew I
was ignorant, but didn't realize I was that bad...
FWIW, SuSE 8.0 has sh-utils-2.0-219
and SuSE 7.3 has sh-utils-2.0-106
and I don't believe that there have been any recent updates.
But, then, I could be w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
GAF posted this on BLU; thought the members here might appreciate it
too. :)
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-949913.html
- --
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- -
I prefer mail encrypted wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Bayard R. Coolidge hath spake thusly:
> Depending on what distro you have, you might want to check
> its history to see what version of util-linux stuff you have
Er,
> # uname --version
> uname (GNU sh-utils) 2.0
> Written b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
> Now, last I checked, Stallman wanted to call the "entire system" GNU/Linux
> because so much of the environment is built upon GNU software.
> However, in the context of 'uname' would "oper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Brenda A. Bell hath spake thusly:
> A dig against my ISP's nameserver for my reverse IP address gives an
> authoritative answer -- makes sense since it does own the address and it
> has the PTR record. A dig against ns1.zoneed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>>
FWIW, I agree with you, Paul. But, I'd aleo like to gently
remind you that you prolly can get your hands on the sources
and edit them appropriately :-).
Depending on what distro you have, you might want to check
its history to see what version of util-linux stuff y
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:55:20 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, at 1:21pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Does anyone know what happened between the 2.4.18 and 2.4.19 kernels
>> that changed the output of 'uname':
>>
>> client:/usr/src/linux# uname --version
>
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, at 1:21pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know what happened between the 2.4.18 and 2.4.19 kernels
> that changed the output of 'uname':
>
> client:/usr/src/linux# uname --version
> uname (sh-utils) 2.0.12
>
> pll@tater:~$ uname --version
>
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, at 10:57am, Michael O'Donnell wrote:
> I've used parted ...
Use caution when using GNU parted on systems which must interoperate with
non-Linux OSes, such as MS-Windows. GNU parted sometimes creates invalid
partition tables which work on Linux but other OSes choke on.
> T
Hi all,
Does anyone know what happened between the 2.4.18 and 2.4.19 kernels
that changed the output of 'uname':
client:/usr/src/linux# uname --version
uname (sh-utils) 2.0.12
pll@tater:~$ uname --version
uname (GNU sh-utils) 2.0.11
yet:
Linux client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Brenda A. Bell wrote:
> Can someone point me to a good resource for getting a better
> understanding of reverse DNS and the role it plays in the big picture?
If you really care enough to spend the money and time, resources fo
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:54:44 EDT
"Brenda A. Bell" said:
>Some good references or opinions on the subject would be most appreciated.
I highly recommend you pick up the O'Reilly book, "DNS & BIND". It's
probably far more than you'll ever need to know about either, but
it's con
I've been fighting the reverse DNS battle for months for blu.org. The
problem was that I was never able to communicate to NDEV (who owns the IP
address block) exactly what I wanted. Eventually, I asked them to create a
PTR record.
But we did set up a zone on our internal DNS server. We have 5
Can someone point me to a good resource for getting a better
understanding of reverse DNS and the role it plays in the big picture?
I understand dig and use it frequently, but I'm trying to get a better
understanding of my current DNS setup, why things work the way they do
and whether my config is
Good point. Partition Magic 7.0 has been updated to support Windows XP NTFS
partitions. But, 5.0 should work fine with FAT, FAT32, EXT2 and Linux swap
partitions.
On 15 Aug 2002 at 11:33, Hewitt Tech wrote:
> Although Partition Magic is mostly well behaved, be careful using something
> like t
Although Partition Magic is mostly well behaved, be careful using something
like the Partition manager that's included with Mandrake. That partition
manager doesn't play well with Windows as I found out the hard way. It marks
extended partitions incorrectly and when Windows tries to access it, sha
I've been using 6.0, but it should work fine. Linux now has a partition
resizer, but I have not used it yet,
On 15 Aug 2002 at 11:11, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
> >
> > I've used Partition Magic successfully for years.
>
> Okey, I've got that (5.0). I just wasn't s
Good post. Ivy Lee is credited as being the father of modern day public
relations.
On 15 Aug 2002 at 10:44, Erik Price wrote:
> The public response to this act inspired Rockefeller to hire the first
> public relations manager -- Ivy Lee.
--
Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Associate Direct
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, "Rodent" == Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Rodent> One of my packages (an email autoresponder; any of you who
Rodent> have sent me private mail have seen it ;-) is designed to be
Rodent> set up as a piped recipient in a .qmail or .forward file.
> On Thu, 15 A
Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
> I've used Partition Magic successfully for years.
Okey, I've got that (5.0). I just wasn't sure it'd play well
with the root partition. :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Serve
I've used parted to move/resize partitions
and it's generally worked quite well, though
it sometimes refuses to do things that seem
reasonable to me, like move a partition such that
the new boundaries overlap the old boundaries.
I don't know why but it'll apparently refuse
to move a partition th
If your postfix service is setup to use it, the .forward should work just
like sendmail's. By default I do believe that .forward is enabled.
- Marc
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> One of my packages (an email autoresponder; any of you who have
> sent me private mail have se
I've used Partition Magic successfully for years. While it is a Windows
product, I create a couple of rescure floppies.
On 15 Aug 2002 at 10:43, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
> >
> > That's very easy. Just use fdisk to change the file type of /dev/sda2.
>
> I am anticip
One of my packages (an email autoresponder; any of you who have
sent me private mail have seen it ;-) is designed to be set up
as a piped recipient in a .qmail or .forward file. E.g.,
| /usr/local/bin/autoresponder
Do any Postfix users here know the equivalent mechanism for
Postfix? Is there o
On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, at 02:32 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Look at what
> some of the stuff John D. Rockefeller did and compare to Bill Gates.
For clarification: Rockefeller is infamous for having sent a militia to
the on-strike mining town of Ludlow, Colorado. When the strikers
ref
Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
> That's very easy. Just use fdisk to change the file type of /dev/sda2.
I am anticipating having to do something similar; I need to enlarge
my / partition. However, it's a sole-boot RH 7.2 system, so I
need to juggle the partitions already in use.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken C
On Wednesday, August 14, 2002, at 04:36 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Open source is a good thing, but there is room for both proprietary and
> open source products. I think one can look at the drug companies for an
> analogy.
> The cost of development of a product is high, and that business needs
Hi,
I am extremely sorry about sending crapy HTML format.
I just got a winblows machine from my colleague who
used all the HTML format in his mail. I did not look at
the settings. I use more linux at home and I love pine
which is easy, fast and reliable mail client.
G.
- Original Message
That's very easy. Just use fdisk to change the file type of /dev/sda2. Use
the mkfs(8) command to format that partition. Once you have done that mount
/dev/sda2 on a convenient mount point, you can simply copy the contents of
/dev/sdb1 to /dev/sda1 (cp -R will work just fine). Then update
/et
Hi,
I have installed SCO, Windows 2000 and Linux
in my machine. I want to get rid of
windows2000 (sounds great?) and want to move
linux partition there and keep the second
hard
disk usable by both SCO and linux(is this
possible??).
Can anyone give me an easiest solution
please?
When: Wednesday,August 21, 2002 7:00 PM (6:30 for general Q&A)
Topic: A discussion of MacOS X and Linux on the Macintosh
Joint meeting with the MacWoburn group.
Presented by:Peter R. Wood, - prw at prwdot dot org and
P.A.M. Borys - trainer at mac dot com
Location: MIT Building 4-370
As o
42 matches
Mail list logo
