Newbie question:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory that
match a pattern?
For example, I have a dir with ~5000 files, I would like to know the
total size of the ~1000 files matching *.txt.
On RHEL and bash, if it matters...
Thanks,
Kent
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 09:11 -0400, Kent Johnson wrote:
Newbie question:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory that
match a pattern?
For example, I have a dir with ~5000 files, I would like to know the
total size of the ~1000 files matching *.txt.
du -c *.txt
On Monday 22 October 2007 09:11, Kent Johnson wrote:
Newbie question:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory that
match a pattern?
For example, I have a dir with ~5000 files, I would like to know the
total size of the ~1000 files matching *.txt.
Ah! Perhaps I
More than you asked for, but here's a command that reports
total space occupied by all files with names ending in .jpg,
recursively from the current directory (but not crossing mount
points) and which is also a gratuitous example of the Process
Substitution facility mentioned in a previous
Kent Johnson wrote:
Newbie question:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory that
match a pattern?
For example, I have a dir with ~5000 files, I would like to know the
total size of the ~1000 files matching *.txt.
On RHEL and bash, if it matters...
Thanks,
Jim Kuzdrall wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 09:11, Kent Johnson wrote:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory that
match a pattern?
For example, I have a dir with ~5000 files, I would like to know the
total size of the ~1000 files matching *.txt.
Ah!
Ooops - that --files0-from= option is apparently
new enough (my du version is 5.97) that it's probably
not widely available. My home system has it, but my
work systems don't... -/
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
Kent Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Newbie question:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory that
match a pattern?
Stephen Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
du -c *.txt | tail -1
du prints out the sizes of each of the matching files; '-c' means you
want a total,
On 10/22/07, Stephen Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 09:11 -0400, Kent Johnson wrote:
Newbie question:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory that
match a pattern?
For example, I have a dir with ~5000 files, I would like to know the
total
Hmm, again, certainly not my fist instinct :)
Paul, we embrace diversity here but that is *definitely* OT...
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On Monday 22 October 2007 09:36, Kent Johnson wrote:
Jim Kuzdrall wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2007 09:11, Kent Johnson wrote:
How can I get the total size, in K, of all files in a directory
that match a pattern?
For example, I have a dir with ~5000 files, I would like to know
the
On 10/22/07, Shawn K. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I know Kent has a Mac and this might be on his laptop, I'd like
to add that this should really be:
du -ck *.txt | tail -1
Since we're on the subject, it should also be noted that du means
*disk usage*. That means du is supposed to
Shawn K. O'Shea wrote:
du -c *.txt | tail -1
Since I know Kent has a Mac and this might be on his laptop, I'd like
to add that this should really be:
du -ck *.txt | tail -1
No, this is a bona fide Linux question :-) it's a Webfaction account.
But thanks for the note!
Kent
On 10/22/07, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ooops - that --files0-from= option is apparently
new enough ... that it's probably not widely available.
find . -xdev -type f -name *.jpg -print0 2/dev/null | xargs -0 du
-ch | tail -1
(untested)
-- Ben
Hello, world!
GNHLUG has an Internet server (it runs this list, amongst other
things). It has a pair of 18 GB disks (mirrored). That is kind of
small, by today's standards -- especially if we want to start doing
things like hosting videos of meetings. It was pointed out that we
might have
On Monday, Oct 22nd 2007 at 10:17 -, quoth Ben Scott:
=On 10/22/07, Shawn K. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Since I know Kent has a Mac and this might be on his laptop, I'd like
= to add that this should really be:
= du -ck *.txt | tail -1
=
= Since we're on the subject, it should also be
The one wrinkle is that they must be 3.5-inch, 1/3-height, SCSI,
80-pin SCA (single connector attachment) disks. That's all that will
fit the 1U server we have.
I have a pair of Seagate 36g that I believe fit the bill here, though
their size is also nuthin' to write home about...
--
On 10/22/07, Star [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one wrinkle is that they must be 3.5-inch, 1/3-height, SCSI,
I have a pair of Seagate 36g that I believe fit the bill here, though
their size is also nuthin' to write home about...
That would still be twice what we have now. So if you're
That would still be twice what we have now. So if you're willing to
part with them for a price we can afford (i.e., free), that would be
*sweet*.
I'd be willing to let 'em go for Fifty Nothings apiece, me thinks...
I'll double-check 'em tonight to make sure that they're the correct
On 10/22/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/07, Star [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one wrinkle is that they must be 3.5-inch, 1/3-height, SCSI,
What kind of hardware are these? Linux x86? SCA SCSI is kind of rare on
x86 and bang/buck is low.
If it's an option, how about a
On 10/22/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of hardware are these? Linux x86?
Linux x86. Actually, the hardware is x86 no matter what OS is
running on it. ;-)
Gory details are available:
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/ServerHardware
SCA SCSI is
On 10/22/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SCA SCSI is kind of rare on x86 ...
If you say so. I've been getting SCA on most of my x86 servers for
something close to a decade now. :) I suppose if you compare vs the
entire population of x86 boxes, including $200 Wal-Mart specials,
Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://1010.co.uk/gneve.html
Because, really, why would you *want* to?
I wonder when we'll be able to save clips to the kill ring?
--kevin
--
GnuPG ID: B280F24E God, I loved that Pontiac.
alumni.unh.edu!kdc -- Tom Waits
On 10/22/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only place I'd seen SCA is on Sun boxes
Yah, we pee cee weenies have SCA too. ;-)
Needs to be rack mounted then.
Needs is a strong word, but MV Communications has been generously
hosting us for free, and the fact that it only takes up
Hmm, I always thought it was power, not space.
Datacenter space varies wildly, but use $20/sqft/mo. A typical
cabinet will take about 17sqft on average (that's not actual
footprint, but allowing for aisleways, etc).
So, $240/mo for the space.
A 42U cabinet will generally hold about 35U of
On 10/22/07, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I always thought it was power, not space.
many != all != most
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On 10/22/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only place I'd seen SCA is on Sun boxes
Yah, we pee cee weenies have SCA too. ;-)
As I should have said, I haven't looked into enough PCs :-)
Needs to be rack mounted then.
Needs is
OK. I've never seen a single datacenter where you were paying for
space above anything else. Even if that's the unit of measure being
sold.
On Oct 22, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
On 10/22/07, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I always thought it was power, not space.
many !=
On 10/22/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needs to look fairly decent and not take up lots of space.
Pretty much. Well, really, needs to not take lots of space, power,
or bandwidth.
SATA is inherently hot plug.
2) power off the drive case
Just to be a wise-ass: In the above,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 04:17:07PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
If somebody wants to donate sweet new 1U server with dual 500 GB
SATA disks, that's fine too ;-)
Not new, and not really all that sweet, but I have a couple of old
(PIII-era) 1U servers that I'd be willing to donate to the cause.
On 10/22/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needs to look fairly decent and not take up lots of space.
Pretty much. Well, really, needs to not take lots of space, power,
or bandwidth.
SATA is inherently hot plug.
2) power off
PySIGManchester, NH 25 October 2007
Kent Johnson: Beautiful Soup
Us Ourselves: Python in Action
Bugger! My drives are not the 80-pin connectors :( Anyone else?
--
~ *
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On 10/22/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) power off the drive case
Just to be a wise-ass: In the above, there's a small wrinkle in your
hot plug scenario... ;-)
Maybe I'm using the term wrong. What I mean is you can plug the SATA drive
into the system while the system is
34 matches
Mail list logo
