On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 23:28 -0400, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Look, I could write a big writeup here, giving you a complete example
of a Makefile that is similar to what I know you are looking for, but
in actuality let me just tell you that I happen to be a big fan of the
GNU Make manual. I think
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 23:28 -0400, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Look, I could write a big writeup here, giving you a complete example
of a Makefile that is similar to what I know you are looking for, but
in actuality let me just tell you that I happen to be a big fan of the
GNU Make manual. I
bruce.lab...@autoliv.com writes:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 23:28 -0400, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Look, I could write a big writeup here, giving you a complete example
of a Makefile that is similar to what I know you are looking for, but
in actuality let me just tell you that I happen to be a big
Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote on 09/17/2009 10:25:44 AM:
bruce.lab...@autoliv.com writes:
Nonetheless, allow me to ask for a critique (do I dare?) for this
construct:
CC=g++
CCOPTS=
INCLUDES=
DEPS=
%.o: %.cpp $(DEPS)
$(CC) -c $ $(CCOPTS) $(INCLUDES)
This
bruce.lab...@autoliv.com writes:
There are two files that need to be compiled with gcc, and five with g++.
(completely un-tested)
MYFLAGS=-g -Werror -Wall -Wcast-qual
CFLAGS=$(MYFLAGS)
CXXFLAGS=$(MYFLAGS)
# we define _XOPEN_SOURCE because
# we define _GNU_SOURCE because
# modify to
The fun never ends...
My make file compiles everything, using the compiler of choice ( using
brute force, not using elegance ). However, ld fails to find -lfftw3. The
error is:
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/local/lib/libfftw3.so when
searching for -lfftw3
/usr/bin/ld: skipping
What flavor are the libs in question? If you're generating x86_64
objects you can't link against i686 libs and vice versa, etc, etc...
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
On 09/17/2009 12:08 PM, bruce.lab...@autoliv.com wrote:
The fun never ends...
My make file compiles everything, using the compiler of choice ( using
brute force, not using elegance ). However, ld fails to find -lfftw3. The
error is:
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
Mark Komarinski mkomarin...@wayga.org wrote on 09/17/2009 12:19:39 PM:
On 09/17/2009 12:08 PM, bruce.lab...@autoliv.com wrote:
The fun never ends...
My make file compiles everything, using the compiler of choice ( using
brute force, not using elegance ). However, ld fails to find
gnhlug-discuss-boun...@mail.gnhlug.org wrote on 09/17/2009 12:18:07 PM:
What flavor are the libs in question? If you're generating x86_64
objects you can't link against i686 libs and vice versa, etc, etc...
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
kevin_d_cl...@comcast.net (Kevin D. Clark) wrote on 09/17/2009 12:03:20
PM:
bruce.lab...@autoliv.com writes:
There are two files that need to be compiled with gcc, and five with
g++.
(completely un-tested)
MYFLAGS=-g -Werror -Wall -Wcast-qual
CFLAGS=$(MYFLAGS)
CXXFLAGS=$(MYFLAGS)
On 09/17/2009 12:46 PM, bruce.lab...@autoliv.com wrote:
FFTW was compiled with -m64 = 64 bit.
What did you mean by
Throw in the output of 'file /usr/local/lib/libfftw3.*'. ?
run that command:
file /usr/local/lib/libfftw3.*
-Mark
___
Mark Komarinski mkomarin...@wayga.org wrote on 09/17/2009 02:43:29 PM:
On 09/17/2009 12:46 PM, bruce.lab...@autoliv.com wrote:
FFTW was compiled with -m64 = 64 bit.
What did you mean by
Throw in the output of 'file /usr/local/lib/libfftw3.*'. ?
run that command:
file
I'm looking to build a small Shuttle barebone machine into a NAS running
Linux. The intent of the machine is to be a networked PC with lots of
storage in a RAID array, made available over the gigabit network interface
via Samba, NFS, and maybe iSCSI protocols. I'm curious what experience
That's basically what a Drobo (http://www.drobo.com/products/drobo.php) is,
only they already considered all of those performance questions for you.
--DTVZ
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Neil Joseph Schelly n...@jenandneil.comwrote:
I'm looking to build a small Shuttle barebone machine into
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Neil Joseph Schelly n...@jenandneil.comwrote:
I'm looking to build a small Shuttle barebone machine into a NAS running
Linux. The intent of the machine is to be a networked PC with lots of
storage in a RAID array, made available over the gigabit network
bruce.labitt writes:
Kevin D. Clark wrote on 09/17/2009 12:03:20 PM:
# we define _XOPEN_SOURCE because
# we define _GNU_SOURCE because
# modify to suit to your situation
CPPFLAGS=-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_GNU_SOURCE
where are CPPFLAGS used below?
They're not ; my example
bruce.lab...@autoliv.com writes:
There are two files that need to be compiled with gcc, and five with g++.
One could set up two objects lists,
OBJ1=file1.o file2.o== use gcc
OBJ2=file3.o file4.o file5.o file6.o file7.o== use g++
SRC1=file1.c
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Neil Joseph Schelly n...@jenandneil.comwrote:
I'm looking to build a small Shuttle barebone machine into a NAS running
Linux. The intent of the machine is to be a networked PC with lots of
storage in a RAID array, made available over the gigabit network
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 17:59 -0400, Alan Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Neil Joseph Schelly
n...@jenandneil.com wrote:
I'm looking to build a small Shuttle barebone machine into a
NAS running
Linux. The intent of the machine is to be a networked PC
On Thursday 17 September 2009 05:59:34 pm Alan Johnson wrote:
Any modern processor will be bored for these services, even if you use an
encrypted and compressed file system. Single core will be plenty, but I
don't know how much it will save you on power.
Single-core processor: $40 (35W)
Drew Van Zandt wrote:
That's basically what a Drobo
(http://www.drobo.com/products/drobo.php) is, only they already
considered all of those performance questions for you.
--DTVZ
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Neil Joseph Schelly
n...@jenandneil.com mailto:n...@jenandneil.com wrote:
What: Software Freedom Day
Who: *YOU*
Where: Pulaski Park, Manchester, NH
Date: Saturday, September 19th, 2009
Time: Flexible, overall roughly 10 AM to 5 PM
We need volunteers for Software Freedom Day this Saturday!
Most of all, we need people to show up and talk to other people. You
+1 :-)
beaks, fox ears, etc.). Carnival-style attractions (popcorn or
snow-cones, or simple games).
Let's avoid food so we don't have a run-in with the health dept, and lets
make absolutely clear that no money is exchanged for games/items/etc so we
don't become a vendor :-)
But yes! We're
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Arc Riley arcri...@gmail.com wrote:
(( Psst - there are three bright lime green Software Freedom Day 2009
tshirts for the first three volunteers to request them.
I'm just looking forward to inhaling the helium ;-)
-- Ben
25 matches
Mail list logo
