If you use snort, read this ASAP:
http://www.snort.org/docs/advisory-2007-02-19.html
Sux to have an application which is sniffing traffic get buffer
overflowed when all that needs to happen is to have the traffic be
read by snort.
--
-- Thomas
___
On 2/19/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/19/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DOSemu has a software 8086 emulator built in.
Reference? The stuff I found at http://www.dosemu.org/ said it did not.
Quick google search showed it in the Changelog specifically for 64 bit
On 2/19/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/19/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/19/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DOSemu has a software 8086 emulator built in.
Reference? The stuff I found at http://www.dosemu.org/ said it did not.
Quick google
On 2/18/07, Jeffry Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/18/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That the Linux community pushing 'You now have choice' breaks down
when it comes to the general public. And that perhaps we can actually
learn from WHY people prefer Windows in general.
My
On 2/17/07, Jim Kuzdrall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not really true. 16-bit machines are *very* limited. There
is not a whole lot you can do in 64 kilobytes of RAM (all you can
directly address with a 16-bit address word).
Not quite so. As a programmer of embedded systems, I
On 2/17/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
machine. They don't understand why, but they know they can play
digital music while writing a term paper on their new Dell, while
their old Apple ][ or IBM-PC Model 5150 couldn't handle that.
That has nothing to do with sized bits I'm afraid.
On 2/17/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/07, Jim Kuzdrall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite so. As a programmer of embedded systems, I would point
out that sales of microprocessors with address spaces of 16-bits (or
less) exceed those of the larger machines by orders of
On 2/17/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
machine. They don't understand why, but they know they can play
digital music while writing a term paper on their new Dell, while
their old Apple ][ or IBM-PC Model 5150 couldn't handle
On 2/17/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And there is quite literally NOTHING you cannot do in 32 bit that
you can in 64.
Yes there is. You can mmap a single 5 GB virtual address space.
Now if you had said that there are no problems that you can not solve,
given enough time
On 2/17/07, Jerry Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:01:19 -0500
Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not think a 128 bit address space computer will ever exist, at
least not in the silicon technologies that we are talking about.
Probably not for a while, but
On 2/17/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. The only limitation to a 16 bit processor is being limited to
64 KB of data per page at a time.
Right, just as the beggar's only limitation is that he has no money.
... Not quite
On 2/17/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 21:08 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote:
On 2/17/07, Jerry Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:01:19 -0500
Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People may giggle, but the PS2 Emotion
On 2/17/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/17/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People may giggle, but the PS2 Emotion processing chip is 128 bit.
I believe it has 128-bit floating point/vector data processing
capabilities, but the integer registers are 64-bit
On 2/15/07, Jason Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Scott wrote:
On 2/15/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It may be double the number of address bits, but it
is woo more than double the address space. ...
Exactly how much more than double is a woo?
Quite specifically
On 2/15/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) nit pick Eh-hem. It may be double the number of address bits, but it
is woo more than double the address space. /nit pick
nit pick
Exactly how much more than double is a woo?
/nit pick
Quite specifically, it's one metric assload.
--
--
On 2/15/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It may be double the number of address bits, but it
is woo more than double the address space. ...
Exactly how much more than double is a woo?
Quite specifically, it's one metric assload
On 2/15/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correction: Windows 2003 R2 x64 supports a full 64-bit address
space, and I'm pretty sure Win XP Pro x64 does as well. See my other
message in this thread about how support for those sucks, though.
Right. I think you actually made my
On 2/15/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Microsoft doesn't support a 64-bit address space, even today,
in Vista. Hey, it's only been like, what, 14 years since the Alpha
came out? Don't rush them...
64 bit OSen:
Alpha OSF/1 1993
On 2/15/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timeline:
May, 1994 - Met Linus Torvalds at DECUS in New Orleans after funding his
trip to speak on Lyenooks. Saw Leenooks for the first time.*
*SNIP*
maddog, that's an awesome little writeup. :-D Note next reply below, however..
On 2/14/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Koolu's Technical Director:
720p and 1080i will make the box melt. As it stands, it is 480p, also
known as DVD resolution (ie: not HDTV). That takes the processor
70-90%, I don't think we can go higher resolution than that. All the
Anyone familiar with http://www.isomedia.com/index.shtml ?
389 for a T1 seems way too cheap.
--
-- Thomas
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On 2/8/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, yeah, sure, but the http server was the first, and is the most
well known project to come from the ASF. It has *always* been
referred to as 'apache' when talking about the web server I run on my
linux box by Joe Linux-user. There is
I was just doing some debugging on some JSONRPC scripts, so in the
true spirit of printf debugging, I had a terminal window open to tail
-f /var/log/apache/error.log and out of the blue:
[Thu Feb 08 11:59:28 2007] [error] [client 65.98.4.130] File does not
exist: /var/www/xmlrpc
[Thu Feb 08
On 2/8/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 12:10 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote:
I was just doing some debugging on some JSONRPC scripts, so in the
true spirit of printf debugging, I had a terminal window open to tail
-f /var/log/apache/error.log and out
QQ
As in, took HDMI/DVI signals and streamed them? I didn't know there
was such a beast.
On 2/7/07, Mark Komarinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember from the MythTV presentation last month that there
was some dual-tuner HDTV box that then output to an Ethernet stream and
was
On 2/6/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
When logging into a UNIX/X system via (g,k,x)dm, said session manager
writes stuff to your ~/.Xauthority file using xauth (which seems to
be it's own sort of black magic).
In an environment where your homedirectory is NFS mounted,
http://www.pulver.com/products/sip/ under 'Sip Services' has a long list
of possible providers. I can't speak for most of them, but it's something
to give you a list of the alternatives.
On 2/5/07, jsf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Travis,
take a look at ViaTalk (http://www.viatalk.com) and,
On 2/5/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pulver.com/products/sip/ under 'Sip Services' has a long list
of possible providers. I can't speak for most of them, but it's something
to give you a list of the alternatives.
One of the providers on the list that is really
On 2/5/07, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://jrblevin.freeshell.org/weblog/linux/mcp51-alsa
Well, heck - all I found when I went searching was people like me
griping about how there was no support (even from ALSA) so this is
a pleasant surprise - thanks! I'll give that a
On 2/5/07, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm, 026c? Must have been an upgraded device since the initial page
was written, as the other MCP51's are 026b.
Adding:
{ 0x10de, 0x026c, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, DEVICE_NFORCE }, /* MCP51 */
to the snd_intel8x0_ids array in
On 2/5/07, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the hda_intel supported it minimally? What kernel version?
The changelog to the module seemed to insinuate that it worked
pretty well.
The hda_intel driver initializes/manages the hardware well
enough that RealPlayer or xmms or
On 2/2/07, Christopher Chisholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for your reply, and everyone else's too!
wall seems like it will work for what i need. I definitely agree that
winpopup in general has been subverted in its intent, but sometimes it's
hilarious to broadcast various things across
I wonder if dhclient or whatever client it's using is crashing, and the
init script is bringing it back up
On 1/31/07, Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Garman writes:
To test things further, I placed both machines behind a Linux DHCP
server so I could look for any unusual
On 2/1/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:26, Thomas Charron wrote:
What I'd LIKE to be able to do is have Samba or some other
authentication
server for network based authentication without having to individually
enroll fingerprints to each Windows laptop
On 2/1/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/1/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, I may have to fall back to just using plain old
passwords,
becouse I can't really find much information on doing ANYTHING beyond
local
authentication.
Can't you just find out
Before I start searching the nooks and crannies of the net, has anyone
ever implemented a method to authenticate with any sort of network services
via biometric devices?
Here's the 'simply' part of what I'm hoping to do, if at all possible. In
my house we have several laptops/computers with
On 1/31/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Before I start searching the nooks and crannies of the net, has anyone
ever implemented a method to authenticate with any sort of network
services
via biometric devices?
I'd say store
Ok, earlier I wasn't sure about the OSDL merger, but now it would seem to
have bore a fruit which definatly deserves applause.
http://www.kroah.com/log/2007/01/29/#free_drivers
--
-- Thomas
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
On 1/30/07, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://jrblevin.freeshell.org/weblog/linux/mcp51-alsa
Well, heck - all I found when I went searching was people like me
griping about how there was no support (even from ALSA) so this is
a pleasant surprise - thanks! I'll give that a
for the 'good of
linux' like Microsoft can, without bias towards a given commercial entity.
On 1/30/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2007, at 10:27, Thomas Charron wrote:
Ok, earlier I wasn't sure about the OSDL merger, but now it would
seem to
have bore a fruit which
IMP, or squirellmail, recomendations in that order.
On 1/25/07, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
I was wondering if y'all would be willing to weigh in on web based email
clients. I'm looking to set one up for my virtually hosted clients.
Requirements:
Must be able to
Was just reading thru slashdot, and found this interesting..
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=2007012113540789
Basically, Open Source Development Lab and the Free Standards Group are
joining forces to create 'The Linux Foundation'.
Now don't get me wrong, it's
On 1/22/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it bothers me that KDE = Linux, ProFTPd = Linux, exim = Linux,
OpenOffice = Linux, if you catch my inference.
Even BSD = Linux, to some people. Linux != Linux, which is
confusing
On 1/19/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's first figure out which we want and then evaluate platforms on
features, maturity, maintainability and reliability.
No, No, NoI much prefer arguing issues around arcane languages.
What about using SNOBOL? :-)
But, Jon...
On 1/19/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 21:43 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote:
On 1/19/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, No, NoI much prefer arguing issues around arcane
languages.
What about using SNOBOL
On 1/10/07, Neil Joseph Schelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had any good experience with spending in the range of $100 or
so on
an access point or router that offers something in the way of reliability
more than the cheap $30-40 range equipment? I'm not overly concerned with
features,
On 1/2/07, Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SubSection Display
Depth 24
Modes 1440x1440 1280x1024
EndSubSection
Does anyone have any clue where to start with this beast?
Is it safe to assume 1440x1440 is a typo
On 1/2/07, Drew Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need a *modeline* for 1440x900, not just a mention of it in the
Display subsection.
Random googled modeline (put with the rest of the modelines.
*** Use at your own risk, YMMV, do not eat, may incur the wrath of the
elder gods, do not
On 12/26/06, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about using the LinkSys RV042/82 series router which has dual
wide area network connections and can do load balancing?
Outbound only, I presume, and even that's a good trick.
Inbound aggregation/load balancing would require
On 12/26/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My partner and I use VPNs to access our employer sites, and we
frequently find that we're bottlenecking on uploads. So we decided to
get a 2nd cable modem so we won't collide with each other.
Small, but important question. What kind of
On 12/27/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/26/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually just looked at my m0n0wall install to see if it could
aggregate multiple WAN connection, but it cannot. pfSense, a fork of
m0n0wall, *CAN*, on the other hand, do this out
On 12/22/06, Christopher Chisholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ahahaha, those were great. what bothers me most about those Mac
commercials is I can just see people sitting at home eating it up like
candy.
Why would this bother you?
--
-- Thomas
___
On 12/22/06, Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Thank goodness for Ubuntu. Without them we might have
been faced with having to use the distribution previously
known as best for beginners, SuSE. (SuSE did look good,
before Novell's decision to become
A long while ago, I starte a thread regarding trying new distros. Well, I
just tried Ubuntu, and oh my gawd am I ever impressed. It isn't even
INSTALLED yet, it's just booted from the CD, and it recognized nearly ALL of
my Toshiba laptops hardware. I have an up and running basic desktop
Well, it IS the safest way to ensure anything running is up to date, and
any new libraries are also utilized.
Thomas
On 12/21/06, Charles Farinella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Charron wrote:
A long while ago, I starte a thread regarding trying new distros.
Well, I just tried Ubuntu
What's it look like?
On 12/13/06, Steven W. Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a big dir full of pictures and my robots.txt file excludes it. So
now I just noticed that google is crawling through it. Anyone know what I
shoul do?
--
-- Thomas
___
Make sure you have IO::Socket:SSL installed as well. It could also be a
socket that was closed prematurely.
On 12/7/06, Brian Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use a perl script to scrape a site under https.
Using perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.20-1mdv2007.0 from RPM.
On 12/7/06, Brian Chabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well.. It didn't work, but we must have changed something... as the
error is identical.
That goes before $mech-get right?
...and from the docs, is it:
$mech-credentials (username = password);
or
$mech-credentials (username,password);
...or does
802.11n. You MAY have to limit the equipment to the same vendor, as there
are still cross-vendor 'quirks' here and there. I believe some will also
operate in the 5Ghz range, and offers speeds much greater (10x - 50x,
depending on who you ask).
On 11/30/06, hewitt_tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/30/06, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is bizarre.
Spare memory will ALWAYS be used to cache. This is fine and 'normal'.
--
-- Thomas
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
On 11/30/06, hewitt_tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
both Linux and Windows systems? If I try EX2/EXT3, with Windows read
it?
AFAIK there isn't an EXT2/EXT3 file system driver for Windows.
I've had good luck with http://www.chrysocome.net/virtualvolumes
--
-- Thomas
http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review
Wouldn't turn off after exactly so much usage, but is relatively
inexpensive, and would seem to give you the information you're looking for.
On 11/28/06, Jeff Kinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if the
On 11/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The backup server here also acts as a warm-spare. If the master server
dies, I just change the IP address on the backup server, and it resumes
right where the master server died. I have tested this a few times to make
sure it all works,
I was just perusing around some of the 'blackfriday' sites, and after all
of the conversations regarding MythTV, this entry for compusa got my
attention:
Hauppauge WinTV Go Plus http://www.blackfriday.info/item/3997 - $14.99
No accelerator chips in that model, but apperently works for MythTV.
That's the normal price. The price I quoted was the 'black friday'
price. Aka, the sale the day after Thanksgiving.
Thomas
On 11/16/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Thomas Charron wrote:
I was just perusing around some of the 'blackfriday' sites
On 11/15/06, Andrew W. Gaunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I noticed about the action tech is a configuration screen forDynamic DNS updates.This is something I'dbeen meaniung to do for some time so I created anaccount with DynDNS andthe action tech router sent an update after entered the info
Brace yourself. I don't know the current status, but in the past, I know Comcast has intercepted all DNS queries, regardless or destination, and redirected them to their own. Thomas
On 11/14/06, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the past couple of weeks I've noticed that sites I can get
Finally! Debian best get that bad boy in their repositories ASAP, before I do my next install that will require Java. ;-) ThomasOn 11/13/06, Jon maddog Hall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Sun picks GPL license for Java code
After years of requests and debates, Sun is set to release Java sourcecode
I've actually not tried in the last few years. I was burnt more then once by the situation where things would install dozens of JDKs that all worked marginally. ThomasOn 11/13/06,
Neil Joseph Schelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 13 November 2006 11:20 am, Thomas Charron wrote: Finally
DVI with decryption capabilities. HD signas can be encrypted end to end to the television. ThomasOn 11/13/06, Chip Marshall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On November 13, 2006, Derek Atkins sent me the following:
Jeff Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ah, didn't know that. So because I don't own
On 11/13/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/13/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DVI with decryption capabilities.HD signas can be encrypted end to end to the television. I thought DVI couldn't do copy restriction stuff, and thus HDMI was
invented.HDMI basically being DVI plus
On 11/13/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/13/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/13/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DVI with decryption capabilities.HD signas can be encrypted end to end
to the television. I thought DVI couldn't do copy restriction stuff
I believe the maximum resolution out the VGA pot is 1920x1080. But out of curiosity, what exactly are you asking for? It can easily handle standard HD resolutions. Thomas
On 11/11/06, Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't specify the VGA output resolution, and I can't seem tofind that
On 11/10/06, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's probably fine for a backend, but may be a bit slow for decoding for the frontend.I've noticed cpu power requirements for playing
are perportional to the bitrate of the MPEG2 so you can always crank
On 11/10/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/10/06, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's probably fine for a backend, but may be a bit slow for decoding
for the frontend.I've noticed cpu power requirements for playing
are perportional
http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/mainboards/mini_itx/epia_en/ They've specifically built the board above for HD signal processing, as well as
5.1 sound. ThomasOn 11/10/06, Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 11/10/06, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 11/8/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happauge cards are generally a safe bet, as nearly all of them with the exeption of the 'WinTV' cards are supported.Now I'm more confused.Pretty much *all* of their products appearto have WinTV in the name.???:-)
My bad. I was refering to the old
On 11/9/06, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 11/8/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The cost diference between, say,
the PVR-150, 250, 300, 500, etc, is the inclusion of hardware based encoders. That's what I expected, but it's confusing
Anyone happen to know of any local places that might sell the VIA EPIA MB/CPU combos? With all of this talk about MythTV, wanted to look at what they may be going for. Perfect little things for setup boxes. MPEG decoder chips, TV Out, and fanless operation. ;-)
Thomas
!!I swear to god I looked and didn't see it. LOL! ThomasOn 11/9/06, Scott Mellott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Thomas Charron wrote: Anyone happen to know of any local places that might sell the VIA
EPIA MB/CPU combos?With all of this talk about MythTV, wanted to look at what they may be going
On 11/8/06, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can Myth be used like a PC displaying on the TV?I use Galleon on theTivo to play shoutcast, show weather, podcasts, movie times andlocations, etc.I'd imagine Myth can do that. *nod* It can web browse, minus the Java, etc..
And if the data is present
See http://www.pchdtv.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=882sid=790b0250ceaa189090e790e53c445505 Comcast does randomize their frequency usage, which is a big nono for them to do, but they do it apperently.
But basically, you just have to find the frequency. There are utilizites that will scan for them,
The higher end PVR cards will work with MythTV and work well with nearly all major brand motherboards out there. The cost diference between, say, the PVR-150, 250, 300, 500, etc, is the inclusion of hardware based encoders. A 600 Mhz machine can easily recoder 2 channels when a dual input board
Hrm.. It would seem I was partially incorrect. DirecTV USED to have a DirecTV/Tivo HD box named the HR10-250. They dont make them anymore, I'm looking into the differences between the capabilities the HR10-250 providers. It can aperently be hacked as easy as any other Tivo, and hence, get it's
Scratch that. Would kinda work, but can't record the majority of the new HD content beng broadcast from DirecTV's new sats. Guess I just leave 'em at low def and cry. Thomas
On 11/8/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm.. It would seem I was partially incorrect. DirecTV USED to have
On 11/8/06, Travis Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Worthless. the HD TiVo box that DirecTV sold only supports premium HDcontent and will NOT support DirecTV HD Local channels.They are encrypted in a different way (mpeg4) that the HD DirecTiVocan never support due to hardware limitations.
Yea, I was
Sad part is, if I had a choice, I'd go with Tivo or some other solution. But with no choice, all I can do is complain and eat their PVR solution for HD. I'd rather have something I dislike then nada at all. Thomas ( Going back to pouting and sighing)
On 11/8/06, Travis Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/7/06, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all - I'm finally foraying into the world of Asterisk.I have a boxto dedicate to it, I have Trixbox (http://www.trixbox.org/) downloadedand ready to install ... now I just need some phones.
I was wondering if folks could suggest (or at least
Getting DirecTV setup, and I don't know why I never noticed, but.. There's no way to record HD from a satalite provider. *le pout* Thomas
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
I MEANT in a way I could get to it from Linux. ;-) I KNOW DirecTV offers HD PVR.On 11/7/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Getting DirecTV setup, and I don't know why I never noticed, but..
There's no way to record HD from a satalite provider. *le pout* Thomas
Yes, we're on the waiting list for them. Which annoys me, because apperently, DirecTech, the contractor in the area for DirecTV, has *6 PALLETS* of them sitting in nashua. But they cannot give them out without DirecTV saying that they have them officially. The installer just tried to do me a
I'm actually having them install 2 extra non HD receivers for MythTV. :-) Specifically, we want them so we can wander around the house streaming TV. ;-P ThomasOn 11/7/06,
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Travis Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Tivo HD-DVR can do it ...The Series 3
*Nod* The Linux HDTV card can only record terrestial HD signals. HD encrypts the signal end to end, all the way to the TV when it's encrypted. ThomasOn 11/7/06,
Drew Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Linux HDTV card won't do it?(Encryption, I assume?)--DTVZ
On 11/7/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm actually having them install 2 extra non HD receivers for MythTV.:-) It's a tough decision for me (TiVo Series 3 vs MythTV).I'm not
that interested in high def TV right now.Most of the programs
On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:02:26 -0500 From: Thomas Charron
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Guru?Maybe not.But pixie dust?That I migt be able to manage. ;)Try merging your targets individually, instead of all at one shot in asingle merge---that way
Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:02:26 -0500
From: Thomas Charron
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Guru?Maybe not.But pixie dust?That I migt be able to manage. ;)
Try merging your targets individually, instead of all at one shot
On 11/4/06, Dan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can add the application to /etc/portage/package.unmask and/etc/portage/package.keywords This will make them appear to be a normalunmasked app. Also browse the forums, see what solutions are out there.
Aye, figured out the format which I had
Aye, the Intel Core 2 Duo's have 'Advanced Intel Speedstep' capabilities. The clock can be dynamically modified by multipliers, I believe up to 8 different speeds. I'll give you more info as I investigate it, as the kernel I built last night I enabled for it.
ThomasOn 11/3/06, Paul Lussier
On 11/2/06, Dan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes KDE will take awhile, a few hours or so. One benchmark I've done: Not too bad on mine, took me like an hour max.
Compile X on 266Mhz: 8+ hours X took about maybee a half an hour, but that included download times.
Yes compiling will take time,
Ok guys and gals, I'm looking at dists that are out there, and I'm really leaning twards Gentoo for my laptop dual boot/VMWare. This is a brandy spankin new laptop, Toshiba P105-9722, Intel Core 2 Duo 7400, 2 gigs ram, blahblah.
What are people opinions of the 'state of distros' right now? I
501 - 600 of 734 matches
Mail list logo
