Ok, sitting down to review various comments...
Bill asked:
>> (a) Unrestricted use of the software for any purpose;
>Can this be construed against GPL-ish licenses? If the State wanted to
>distribute the software for some purpose,
> GPL'ed software would have restrictions.
The above covers _us
"Jon 'maddog' Hall" writes:
>
> I will not comment on most of your discussion, since I think you and
> I agree that some of the words in Seth's document will be hard to
> prove as written, and perhaps should be modified so the opponents of
> the bill will not have statements to challenge.
Indeed.
Joshua,
I will not comment on most of your discussion, since I think you and I agree
that some of
the words in Seth's document will be hard to prove as written, and perhaps
should be modified
so the opponents of the bill will not have statements to challenge.
>> If you want to make "adherence t
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen
> wrote:
> > "Jon 'maddog' Hall" writes:
> >>
>
> > Basically, there's historically been confusion over whether `OSS'
> > could qualify as `COTS'--due at least in part do our own community'
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen
wrote:
> "Jon 'maddog' Hall" writes:
>>
> Basically, there's historically been confusion over whether `OSS'
> could qualify as `COTS'--due at least in part do our own community's
> willingness to use "open" and "commercial" as opposing terms,
>
"Jon 'maddog' Hall" writes:
>
> Seth,
>
> Sorry for not replying sooner, but family duties at the holiday season
> had me hopping.
>
> Here are some small comments:
>
> Statement of Purpose and Findings, Section I (d):
>
> "and the monopoly conditions imposed by these suppliers"
>
> remov
Seth,
Sorry for not replying sooner, but family duties at the holiday season
had me hopping.
Here are some small comments:
Statement of Purpose and Findings, Section I (d):
"and the monopoly conditions imposed by these suppliers"
remove the word "monopoly". Closed source is closed source
This is pretty exciting. Please keep us up to date on the progress of
the bill.
On 12/24/2010 09:30 PM, Seth Cohn wrote:
> For your holiday enjoyment, and for you to think about in the next few
> days, and get back to me with feedback (pro or con), improvements, and
> other suggestions... I welco
DoD Guidance on Open Source Software:
http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/oss/2009OSS.pdf
DoD FAQ on Open Source Software:
http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/oss/Open_Source_Software_(OSS)_FAQ.htm#Frequently_Asked_Questions_regarding_Open_Source_Software_.28OSS.29_and_the_Department_of_Defense_.28DoD
For your holiday enjoyment, and for you to think about in the next few
days, and get back to me with feedback (pro or con), improvements, and
other suggestions... I welcome your input, and if you'd like to speak
at the hearing on this bill on a particular element, please let me
know...
This is one
10 matches
Mail list logo
