On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen <roz...@hackerposse.com
> wrote:
> On 02/21/2016 06:49 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> > According to
> >
> >
> http://fossforce.com/2016/02/linux-mint-hacked-iso-for-17-3-cinnamon-edition-modified/
> >
> > Or
On 02/21/2016 06:49 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> According to
>
> http://fossforce.com/2016/02/linux-mint-hacked-iso-for-17-3-cinnamon-edition-modified/
>
> Original web site posting here:
>
> http://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=2994
>
> Be careful out there.
And he says "
According to
http://fossforce.com/2016/02/linux-mint-hacked-iso-for-17-3-cinnamon-edition-modified/
Original web site posting here:
http://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=2994
Be careful out there.
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche
kevin_d_cl...@comcast.net (Kevin D. Clark) writes:
Joshua Judson Rosen writes:
It's funny what non-hackers notice and appreciate :)
The feature that I *cannot* live without is virtual desktops. I
prefer to have 16 or 25 of them, in a 4x4 or 5x5 format. I logically
separate my work onto
My solution was to flip gnome 3 the bird and switch to XFCE.
Me, too - I switched to the XFCE-based Xubuntu.
I couldn't figure out Gnome3 when I upgraded to Fedora 16. It just
threw me for a loop. I tried out LXDE and then I found that XFCE
suited me better.
YMMV.
--kevin
--
kevin_d_cl...@comcast.net (Kevin D. Clark) writes:
My solution was to flip gnome 3 the bird and switch to XFCE.
Me, too - I switched to the XFCE-based Xubuntu.
I couldn't figure out Gnome3 when I upgraded to Fedora 16. It just
threw me for a loop. I tried out LXDE and then I found
Joshua Judson Rosen writes:
It's funny what non-hackers notice and appreciate :)
The feature that I *cannot* live without is virtual desktops. I
prefer to have 16 or 25 of them, in a 4x4 or 5x5 format. I logically
separate my work onto these desktops, and I navigate between these
with my
On 05 Jan 2012 13:53:04 -0500
kevin_d_cl...@comcast.net (Kevin D. Clark) wrote:
I'll say one really nice thing about LXDE: if you want to change
the format of the displayed time in the date/time applet, the docs say
use the format described in strftime(). Wow, that's minimal, and
that's
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Kevin D. Clark kevin_d_cl...@comcast.netwrote:
I'll say one really nice thing about LXDE: if you want to change
the format of the displayed time in the date/time applet, the docs say
use the format described in strftime(). Wow, that's minimal, and
that's
On 1/5/12, Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
Only thing is I can't figure out how to present both local and UTC... :)
29_desktops_here'ly yrs,
-Bill
Use python.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Bruce Labitt
bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.netwrote:
snip
Maybe I'm just looking to hold on to gnome. It worked well enough. It
didn't have too much stupid stuff and was relatively easy to maintain.
Any insights?
Who knows how long it will still be available,
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:42:18 -0500
Shawn O'Shea sh...@eth0.net wrote:
Who knows how long it will still be available, but if you launch
Ubuntu Software Center and install the GNOME Desktop Environment
package (or apt-get install gnome-desktop-environment) you will get
GNOME and GNOME Classic
My solution was to flip gnome 3 the bird and switch to XFCE. I've been much
happier since. It may be missing some of the graphical bells and whistles
you get with gnome 2 plus compositing, but at least I have all of the
functionality that I'm used to from gnome 2.
- Chris
On Wed, Jan 4,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Ed lawson elaw...@grizzy.com wrote:
Thank you for that info. I have been switching between Gnome 3 and the
Classic Gnome options provided in SID and nice to know you can get
there in Ubuntu too. For me using classic is relatively
painless, but Gnome 3 will
My solution was to flip gnome 3 the bird and switch to XFCE.
Me, too - I switched to the XFCE-based Xubuntu.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:46:17 -0500, Ken D'Ambrosio k...@jots.org wrote:
On 01/02/2012 03:02 PM, David Rysdam wrote:
I actually upgraded directly from Ubuntu 10.04 to Debian 6 with zero
problems. That is, I kept my /home (and dotfiles) and just replaced the
OS and had no issues other than
I'm tempted to try out mint. There are quite a few options. From what
I gather, Mint is based on Ubuntu. So the latest Mint 12 is based on
Oneiric. I have Oneiricnow and really think it is a steaming bucket as
far as productivity. It really is not made for doing work, it seems to
be more
A friend of mine at work (GE) uses Mint for his primary desktop environment and
swears by it. I think GNOME 3 is the desktop environment (rather than Unity).
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 2, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Bruce Labitt bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net wrote:
I'm tempted to try out mint
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:42:16 -0500, Bruce Labitt bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net
wrote:
Should I take the plunge to LMDE? I've never run debian before.
Yes you have. Ubuntu, especially older versions, *is* Debian, but with
shinier graphics.
I'm not looking for which distro is the best ever,
On 01/02/2012 01:59 PM, David Rysdam wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:42:16 -0500, Bruce
Labittbruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net wrote:
Should I take the plunge to LMDE? I've never run debian before.
Yes you have. Ubuntu, especially older versions, *is* Debian, but with
shinier graphics.
Yes, and
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:27:42 -0500, Bruce Labitt bruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net
wrote:
On 01/02/2012 01:59 PM, David Rysdam wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:42:16 -0500, Bruce
Labittbruce.lab...@myfairpoint.net wrote:
Getting closer to topic - what are the down sides to Debian? More work
21 matches
Mail list logo
