Re: Web mail client for mobile devices?

2012-03-12 Thread Joseph Smith
Not sure if this if what your looking for is a mobile way to connect to your email server but there is mobile client for roundcube. For android you could also use K-9 mail with a imap account. - Joe On 03/11/2012 10:01 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > Hey, all. I really liked the old version of And

Web mail client for mobile devices?

2012-03-11 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
Hey, all. I really liked the old version of Android's e-mail client. Then the new one came along, and it's significantly more cumbersome to access folders. (I know -- just a couple clicks, but ones that weren't necessary before.) Anyway, I've looked at most of the other options in the market, a

Re: ISP TOS violations (was: web mail)

2003-06-18 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:14:24AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Since I know people will bring this up: Yes, there is a lack of > competition in the industry, and yes, cable monopolies are unfair, and yes, > business class Internet feeds are overpriced. None of that invalidates my > poin

ISP TOS violations (was: web mail)

2003-06-18 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, at 6:41pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just because they told you that they won't let you doesn't make it suck > any less that you can't... And just because you or any number of other people think it sucks doesn't mean their TOS don't apply. :-) > ...and of course /no one/

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread Derek Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:33:08PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Though apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*&D#!!! Adelphia's blocked my port 80 ... > > Just in case you're not aware: Adelphia's TOS prohibit running servers of > any kind. Just beca

Re: ISP TOS violations (was: web mail)

2003-06-17 Thread Bill Mullen
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Furthermore, if I were you, would not contact Adelphia about this. > It could easily backfire. They might not know or care about your > existing TOS violations, but complaining that you you are having trouble > violating their Terms Of Service mi

ISP TOS violations (was: web mail)

2003-06-17 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, at 5:40pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As for their ToS not allowing servers, well... you'd think if they really > cared ... Terms Of Serivce are policy. Filters are enforcement. A current and/or previous lack of enforcement does not cancel policy. Just ask Iraq. :-) F

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread ken
> ken> Though apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*&D#!!! Adelphia's blocked my port 80, > ken> so I'm having to VPN in to use it.) > > Can't you just run the server on a different port? Choose something > which isn't normally associated with a web server, like 1010 or some > other random port number

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread Michael O'Donnell
>They are both very well done, if you don't mind learning something new. EBRAINTOOSMALL ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread pll
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, "ken" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ken> Though apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*&D#!!! Adelphia's blocked my port 80, ken> so I'm having to VPN in to use it.) Can't you just run the server on a different port? Choose something which isn't normally associated with a w

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread Jason Stephenson
At my previous place of regular, FTE we used IMHO web mail. It's pretty good, and fairly customizable for appearance. There are a couple of drawbacks: 1) it's written in Pike, a rather obscure C++-like programming language 2) it pretty much requires that you use the Roxen web server

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, at 4:00pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm a big fan of Squirrelmail. Me too! We used to use Horde IMP, but their custom-weirdo PHP libraries started to become a pain to get working right. We switched to Squirrel and haven't looked back since. "Low effort" and "Minimum s

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:57, Derek Martin wrote: > What are people using for webmail these days? Squirrelmail? > Something else? War stories (good or bad)? I'm using several different web mail systems. For strictly mail and mail only, I use Twig ( http://twig.screwdriver.net/ ). I

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread ken
> What are people using for webmail these days? Squirrelmail? > Something else? War stories (good or bad)? I'm a big fan of Squirrelmail. It's doing the job quite nicely, and with the plugins, it's incredibly extensible. Heck: I'm typing in it now, from my home account. (Though apparently [EM

Re: web mail

2003-06-17 Thread Kurth Bemis
we currently use squirrelmail, and find that it's "OK" Currently we're working on our own version of SM for use with our billing and spam filtering system. ~kurth Derek Martin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What are people using for webmail these days? Squirrelmail? Somet