Re: Board meeting July 31st?

2008-07-14 Thread Ben Scott
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'd like to have the board get together for a meeting. Thursday July
 31st is the fifth Thursday of the month. How would that work for everyone?

  Works for me.

 Ben and Bill may also have updates.

  I should.

-- Ben
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Re: Board meeting July 31st - location

2008-07-14 Thread Ted Roche
Ben Scott wrote:

 
   The main brand of the Manchester PL is open that evening (West
 Branch is closed).  The Winchell Room (seats 25 w/ tables) is
 showing as available.  (Hunt Room is not.)
 

Excellent suggestion. Who could make a meeting, 6 PM to 8 PM?

-- 

Ted Roche
Ted Roche  Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Re: Board meeting July 31st - location

2008-07-14 Thread Shawn O'Shea

 Excellent suggestion. Who could make a meeting, 6 PM to 8 PM?


That should be doable for me.

-Shawn
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Re: Board meeting July 31st - location

2008-07-14 Thread Ted Roche
Ben Scott wrote:

 
   The main brand of the Manchester PL is open that evening (West
 Branch is closed).  The Winchell Room (seats 25 w/ tables) is
 showing as available.  (Hunt Room is not.)
 

Reserved, in case we can actually get a quorum. Directions are here:

http://216.204.202.157/website/library/VisitUs/Directions/tabid/778/Default.aspx

-- 

Ted Roche
Ted Roche  Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Re: Board meeting July 31st?

2008-07-13 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Jul 10, 2008, at 19:52, Arc Riley wrote:

 I'm not a board member, but this seems like a more prudent agenda  
 item.  Not
 saying I wouldn't like to see the Ubuntu SIG discussed, but I can  
 see the
 fear of there being a rush to form new SIGs be a barrier for it.

A brief history of PySIG (with much paraphrasing):

Lloyd asked me if we ought to do python discussions on the DLSLUG  
list.  He had started a Meetup already.
I said, hey, why don't we do a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and maybe  
start a Python SIG.
After we had that running for a few weeks I announced it to GNHLUG- 
discuss.  Bill Sconce joined and said, howdy.
A few months later Bill said, I think we should meetspace.
And more than three years later PySIG is a vibrant SIG of GNHLUG.  I  
believe the Ruby SIG is doing similarly well, though I haven't made  
it to that timezone yet.

So, which problem are we solving by imposing a regulatory structure  
on SIG's?  Empirically the organic model has proven to be  
successful.  So, let's fix that?

-Bill

-
Bill McGonigle, Owner   Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC  Home: 603.448.1668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Cell: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Page: 603.442.1833
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf

___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Re: Board meeting July 31st?

2008-07-10 Thread Arc Riley
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Two agenda items come to mind right away: I can update folks on my
 initial meeting with the Franklin Pierce Law Center intern helping us
 with 501(c)(3) status. We can discuss the proposed Ubuntu SIGs.


On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



As a member of the leadership of the group (as it were) I would support
 using this occasion to formulate the necessary procedures to create
 SIGs.


I'm not a board member, but this seems like a more prudent agenda item.  Not
saying I wouldn't like to see the Ubuntu SIG discussed, but I can see the
fear of there being a rush to form new SIGs be a barrier for it.

Obviously (in my mind) one of the requirements would be people willing to
commit the time and energy towards getting it started, perhaps 3
SIG/Chapter Officers at minimum using what I've seen from the PySIG
leadership (seems to be 3-4 people doing most of the work).

Formalized, this would pre-filter requests that don't have sufficient member
support to be workable as a group.  This turns it into primarily bottom-up
organizing, what are people interested in doing, rather than top-down
what we think would be a good idea to form.

Also, SIGs/Chapters could be started as independent groups who then request
to become part of GNHLUG after they've successfully formed, have 3 officers
already active, and have had a few successful meetings.
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/


Re: Board meeting July 31st?

2008-07-10 Thread Jon 'maddog' Hall
Well unfortunately I am entering into my travel period again, and
having a time when I could meet physically with y'all is tough.  On the
31st I will be in Spain, which makes it particularly bad, since any time
that you could get together (i.e. the evening) would be wee hours for
me.

I do suggest, however, that you change the topic of discussion from
Ubuntu SIG to SIG in general and formulate guidelines for any SIG
that might want to join, what it means for them and what they have to do
to meet the bar as a SIG.

In DECUS they had to have enough prospective members to have an set of
officers (President, VP, Sec. and Treasurer) which meant that there was
some set of people that the main DECUS group could contact.  They also
had to have a charter (telling what they were about) and a formed set of
simple by-laws that allowed the officers to be elected (which typically
came down to us re-electing the same ones each year...but there was a
way to get rid of dead meat).  What DECUS gave them was a contact list
of new DECUS members so they could grow their group, and a 501c3 shield
(granted, we do not have that, but we could get it).

In the case of the Ubuntu SIG, we could look at a co-SIG, but I think it
would be better if we just offered GNHLUG Ubuntu SIG membership to the Ubuntu
Co-lo members.  Therefore GNHLUG Ubuntu SIG membership would not be tied to the
Ubuntu Colo group and vice-versa.

If we do this once, we can then apply it to any SIGs that want to join.

md
-- 
Jon maddog Hall
Executive Director   Linux International(R)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 80 Amherst St. 
Voice: +1.603.672.4557   Amherst, N.H. 03031-3032 U.S.A.
WWW: http://www.li.org

Board Member: Uniforum Association
Board Member Emeritus: USENIX Association (2000-2006)

(R)Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in several
countries.
(R)Linux International is a registered trademark in the USA used
pursuant
   to a license from Linux Mark Institute, authorized licensor of Linus
   Torvalds, owner of the Linux trademark on a worldwide basis
(R)UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the USA and other
   countries.


___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/