Re: [Gnoga-list] Proposal for Gnoga coding guidelines.

2016-10-17 Thread marciant
-Original Message- >From: Pascal >Sent: Oct 15, 2016 5:06 AM >To: Gnoga support list >Subject: [Gnoga-list] Proposal for Gnoga coding guidelines. > ... > Ada type entity is ending with "_Type" for a common type, > "_Access" for an simple > access type, "_Class" for an access to class ty

Re: [Gnoga-list] Proposal for Gnoga coding guidelines.

2016-10-17 Thread Jeffrey R. Carter
On 10/17/2016 07:54 AM, marci...@earthlink.net wrote: > Ugh :( While you will get no argument from me, I think it fair to point out that the guidelines have to fit with the existing Gnoga code by Botton, which uses such redundant suffices extensively. -- Jeff Carter "When Roman engineers built

Re: [Gnoga-list] Proposal for Gnoga coding guidelines.

2016-10-17 Thread Jean-Pierre Rosen
Le 17/10/2016 à 22:56, Jeffrey R. Carter a écrit : > While you will get no argument from me, I think it fair to point out that the > guidelines have to fit with the existing Gnoga code by Botton, which uses such > redundant suffices extensively. > Agreed. We are not starting a new project here, ju