Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
2/2 from i18n Thanks El mié., 14 sept. 2022 19:26, Piotr Drąg via gnome-i18n < gnome-i18n@gnome.org> escribió: > śr., 14 wrz 2022 o 14:53 Florian Müllner via gnome-i18n > napisał(a): > > > > Hey, > > > > I'd like to request a freeze break for > > > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2485 > > > > It adds context to an existing translation as requested by Alexandre. > > > > Besides approval, I'd also appreciate feedback that the added context > > is actually helpful :-) > > > > It is helpful, and here is 1/2 from i18n. :) > > > -- > Piotr Drąg > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
śr., 14 wrz 2022 o 14:53 Florian Müllner via gnome-i18n napisał(a): > > Hey, > > I'd like to request a freeze break for > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2485 > > It adds context to an existing translation as requested by Alexandre. > > Besides approval, I'd also appreciate feedback that the added context > is actually helpful :-) > It is helpful, and here is 1/2 from i18n. :) -- Piotr Drąg ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hello, I want to bring this localisation issue to our attention: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/5820 When this is fixed, new strings also will be available for translation, and these strings are highly visible. Regards Jordi, Missatge de Florian Müllner via gnome-i18n del dia dc., 14 de set. 2022 a les 14:53: > Hey, > > I'd like to request a freeze break for > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2485 > > It adds context to an existing translation as requested by Alexandre. > > Besides approval, I'd also appreciate feedback that the added context > is actually helpful :-) > > Cheers, > Florian > > > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hey, I'd like to request a freeze break for https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2485 It adds context to an existing translation as requested by Alexandre. Besides approval, I'd also appreciate feedback that the added context is actually helpful :-) Cheers, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome shell
2/2 from i18n. Thanks! El lun, 5 sept 2022 a las 10:22, Alexandre Franke () escribió: > On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 7:09 PM Florian Müllner > wrote: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2467 > > > > It adds an ellipsis to a menu item that should have it according to the > HIG. > > Trivial enough. 1/2 from i18n. > > -- > Alexandre Franke > GNOME Hacker > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome shell
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 7:09 PM Florian Müllner wrote: > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2467 > > It adds an ellipsis to a menu item that should have it according to the HIG. Trivial enough. 1/2 from i18n. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for gnome shell
Hey, I'd like to request a string freeze break for https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2467 It adds an ellipsis to a menu item that should have it according to the HIG. Thanks, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
2/2 from us, thanks! czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:16 Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n napisał(a): > > +1 from i18n > > Thanks! > > El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:59, Florian Müllner () > escribió: >> >> Hey everyone! >> >> As you may know, we now have an official "Extensions" app for managing >> gnome-shell extensions. Unfortunately we missed adding appdata for it, >> so it doesn't show up in GNOME Software at all. >> >> I would like to address this for 3.36.1 as part of >> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1081, but >> it adds a new translatable string for the description: >> >> "GNOME Extensions handles updating extensions, configuring extension >> preferences and removing or disabling unwanted extensions." >> >> That string has been heavily inspired by the release notes, so >> hopefully it doesn't impose too much work on translators. >> >> Stay safe, >> Florian >> >> >> ___ >> gnome-i18n mailing list >> gnome-i18n@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n -- Piotr Drąg https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
+1 from i18n Thanks! El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:59, Florian Müllner () escribió: > Hey everyone! > > As you may know, we now have an official "Extensions" app for managing > gnome-shell extensions. Unfortunately we missed adding appdata for it, > so it doesn't show up in GNOME Software at all. > > I would like to address this for 3.36.1 as part of > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1081, but > it adds a new translatable string for the description: > > "GNOME Extensions handles updating extensions, configuring extension > preferences and removing or disabling unwanted extensions." > > That string has been heavily inspired by the release notes, so > hopefully it doesn't impose too much work on translators. > > Stay safe, > Florian > > > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hey everyone! As you may know, we now have an official "Extensions" app for managing gnome-shell extensions. Unfortunately we missed adding appdata for it, so it doesn't show up in GNOME Software at all. I would like to address this for 3.36.1 as part of https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1081, but it adds a new translatable string for the description: "GNOME Extensions handles updating extensions, configuring extension preferences and removing or disabling unwanted extensions." That string has been heavily inspired by the release notes, so hopefully it doesn't impose too much work on translators. Stay safe, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
2/2 from i18n Thanks! El mié., 11 sept. 2019 a las 7:55, Piotr Drąg via gnome-i18n (< gnome-i18n@gnome.org>) escribió: > śr., 11 wrz 2019, 00:43 użytkownik Florian Müllner > napisał: > >> Hey! >> >> I'd like to push a minor string change in >> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1538. >> >> The change is in the --help output of the newly-added gnome-extensions >> CLI tool and very simple: >> "Use %s to get detailed help.\n" becomes >> "Use “%s” to get detailed help.\n" (note the quotation marks around %s). >> >> It is not very important to get the change into 3.34.1, but Piotr >> suggested asking for a freeze break, so here we are :-) >> > > And here’s 1/2 from i18n. :) > > Best, > Piotr > >> ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
śr., 11 wrz 2019, 00:43 użytkownik Florian Müllner napisał: > Hey! > > I'd like to push a minor string change in > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1538. > > The change is in the --help output of the newly-added gnome-extensions > CLI tool and very simple: > "Use %s to get detailed help.\n" becomes > "Use “%s” to get detailed help.\n" (note the quotation marks around %s). > > It is not very important to get the change into 3.34.1, but Piotr > suggested asking for a freeze break, so here we are :-) > And here’s 1/2 from i18n. :) Best, Piotr > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
String freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hey! I'd like to push a minor string change in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1538. The change is in the --help output of the newly-added gnome-extensions CLI tool and very simple: "Use %s to get detailed help.\n" becomes "Use “%s” to get detailed help.\n" (note the quotation marks around %s). It is not very important to get the change into 3.34.1, but Piotr suggested asking for a freeze break, so here we are :-) Cheers, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
This request has 2/2 from release-team, and it's just one string (with one word). I agree with Alexandre, but having RT approval there is no need to stop this from i18n, so 1/2. Regards El mié., 4 sept. 2019 a las 7:28, Alexandre Franke () escribió: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:55 PM Arnaud Bonatti > wrote: > > They cannot, there is no way to do that. Well, in fact, they can set > > all the things manually if they know dconf-editor as I know it, as its > > maintainer and main developer; but the *creation* of a folder would > > look impossible to most users, due to the way the settings are done > > (only command line allows that, more easily with `dconf` than with > > `gsettings`; or Software, until now at least); and there is nothing > > that will help them to do a *renaming*, in any way. > > Ok. I took Georges' indication as “it can be done with gsettings” > anyway, so that doesn’t change my approval and conditions. > > -- > Alexandre Franke > GNOME Hacker > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:55 PM Arnaud Bonatti wrote: > They cannot, there is no way to do that. Well, in fact, they can set > all the things manually if they know dconf-editor as I know it, as its > maintainer and main developer; but the *creation* of a folder would > look impossible to most users, due to the way the settings are done > (only command line allows that, more easily with `dconf` than with > `gsettings`; or Software, until now at least); and there is nothing > that will help them to do a *renaming*, in any way. Ok. I took Georges' indication as “it can be done with gsettings” anyway, so that doesn’t change my approval and conditions. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Hey, a “small detail”: 2019-09-03 22:44 UTC+02:00, Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n : > Users can use dconf-editor to rename folders, but that would make for > a terrible user experience. They cannot, there is no way to do that. Well, in fact, they can set all the things manually if they know dconf-editor as I know it, as its maintainer and main developer; but the *creation* of a folder would look impossible to most users, due to the way the settings are done (only command line allows that, more easily with `dconf` than with `gsettings`; or Software, until now at least); and there is nothing that will help them to do a *renaming*, in any way. Regards, Arnaud -- Arnaud Bonatti courriel : arnaud.bona...@gmail.com ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
1/2 for a merge right **after** 3.34 for a 3.34.1 inclusion. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Users can use dconf-editor to rename folders, but that would make for a terrible user experience. Renaming folders is critical to managing app folders from GNOME Shell. Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 às 17:41, Alexandre Franke escreveu: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:28 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto > wrote: > > You should read it again, then. > > I really shouldn’t. That is my point actually. A freeze request should > clearly explain from the start what the benefits and risks are, so > that we coordinators can make a well-informed decision. The easier you > make it for us, the more likely we are to give you a quick approval. > > > The rename popover, that is introduced by > > that merge request, will not be introduced if the merge request isn't > merged. > > Without the rename folder popover, users won't be able to rename folders > > from GNOME Shell. > > Thank you, that is important information. Would the user have a > fallback mechanism to do it in that case? As it is, the risk of not > merging it doesn’t seem that high to me and we are getting late so I’m > leaning towards not granting you the exception for 3.34, but approving > for a merge right after 3.34 is out so we have time to translate it > for 3.34.1. > > -- > Alexandre Franke > GNOME Hacker > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:28 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto wrote: > You should read it again, then. I really shouldn’t. That is my point actually. A freeze request should clearly explain from the start what the benefits and risks are, so that we coordinators can make a well-informed decision. The easier you make it for us, the more likely we are to give you a quick approval. > The rename popover, that is introduced by > that merge request, will not be introduced if the merge request isn't merged. > Without the rename folder popover, users won't be able to rename folders > from GNOME Shell. Thank you, that is important information. Would the user have a fallback mechanism to do it in that case? As it is, the risk of not merging it doesn’t seem that high to me and we are getting late so I’m leaning towards not granting you the exception for 3.34, but approving for a merge right after 3.34 is out so we have time to translate it for 3.34.1. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
You should read it again, then. The rename popover, that is introduced by that merge request, will not be introduced if the merge request isn't merged. Without the rename folder popover, users won't be able to rename folders from GNOME Shell. Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 às 17:22, Alexandre Franke escreveu: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:16 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto > wrote: > > not approving this break would prevent that merge request from being > merged. > > Right. That’s not a very useful answer though. My question was what > the current behaviour is, i.e what will the user see if this doesn’t > get merged. > > -- > Alexandre Franke > GNOME Hacker > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:16 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto wrote: > not approving this break would prevent that merge request from being merged. Right. That’s not a very useful answer though. My question was what the current behaviour is, i.e what will the user see if this doesn’t get merged. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
The new string is a verb, "Rename". It is displayed at the rename folder popover, introduced by that merge request. Since it's a critical part of the merge request, not approving this break would prevent that merge request from being merged. Em ter, 3 de set de 2019 às 16:54, Alexandre Franke escreveu: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:08 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via > gnome-i18n wrote: > > I hereby ask for String and UI freeze break exceptions for landing GNOME > Shell's > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/675. This > merge > > request is an important last step for feature-completeness of the > ability to create > > and delete folders within GNOME Shell. > > What’s the new string? I had a quick look at the MR and couldn’t find > it. When/how is it displayed? What is the current behaviour (i.e. what > happens if we don’t approve the freeze break)? > > -- > Alexandre Franke > GNOME Hacker > ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:08 PM Georges Basile Stavracas Neto via gnome-i18n wrote: > I hereby ask for String and UI freeze break exceptions for landing GNOME > Shell's > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/675. This merge > request is an important last step for feature-completeness of the ability to > create > and delete folders within GNOME Shell. What’s the new string? I had a quick look at the MR and couldn’t find it. When/how is it displayed? What is the current behaviour (i.e. what happens if we don’t approve the freeze break)? -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Fwd: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
CCing the i18n team. -- Mensagem encaminhada -- De: Georges Basile Stavracas Neto Assunto: String & UI Freeze break request for GNOME Shell Data: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:05:44 -0300 Para: release-t...@gnome.org To the Release Team, I hereby ask for String and UI freeze break exceptions for landing GNOME Shell's <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/675>. This merge request is an important last step for feature-completeness of the ability to create and delete folders within GNOME Shell. With respect, Georges ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
This looks pretty self-contained, and I presume you originally sent the request a week and a half ago when we were earlier in the cycle. So +1 of 2 from me. Michael ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
[ Re-sending since it seems this didn't make it to the release team list ] > Hi, > > I'd like to request a freeze break request for this gnome-shell UI addition: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783550 - it's basically an > Alt+Tab style switcher to cycle through multi-monitor configurations > on laptops. > > Thanks, > Rui ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Rui Tiago Cação Matos < tiagoma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to request a freeze break request for this gnome-shell UI > addition: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783550 - it's basically an > Alt+Tab style switcher to cycle through multi-monitor configurations > on laptops. > > I'm in favor, +1 from the release team ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hi, I'd like to request a freeze break request for this gnome-shell UI addition: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783550 - it's basically an Alt+Tab style switcher to cycle through multi-monitor configurations on laptops. Thanks, Rui ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:29 PM Piotr Drągwrote: > By the way, I really like this feature. :) > Heh, thanks (and for the two +1s) - I'll push the patches after releasing 3.24.0 later today ... Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
2017-03-20 17:17 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Franke: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Florian Müllner wrote: >> Hey, > > Hi, > >> I would like to request a post-3.24.0 freeze break for >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252, which introduces one new >> string : >> >> If gnome-weather is installed but hasn't been used yet, so there's no >> location to show a weather forecast for, we should display "Select a >> location…" in the calendar drop-down. > > Sounds reasonable. +1/2. > 2/2 from i18n. By the way, I really like this feature. :) Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Florian Müllnerwrote: > Hey, Hi, > I would like to request a post-3.24.0 freeze break for > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252, which introduces one new > string : > > If gnome-weather is installed but hasn't been used yet, so there's no > location to show a weather forecast for, we should display "Select a > location…" in the calendar drop-down. Sounds reasonable. +1/2. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Hey, I would like to request a post-3.24.0 freeze break for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252, which introduces one new string : If gnome-weather is installed but hasn't been used yet, so there's no location to show a weather forecast for, we should display "Select a location…" in the calendar drop-down. Thanks, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On 28 Feb 2017 19:02, "Florian Müllner"wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:52 PM Matthias Clasen wrote: > we don't have much else to show in that area, this cycle...maybe thats me > wearing a marketing rather than rel-eng hat > I was afraid of mentioning the 'm' word, but that was indeed a main motivator behind the push for finishing up those branches ___ gnome-doc-list mailing list gnome-doc-l...@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list 2/2 for release team ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:52 PM Matthias Clasenwrote: > we don't have much else to show in that area, this cycle...maybe thats me > wearing a marketing rather than rel-eng hat > I was afraid of mentioning the 'm' word, but that was indeed a main motivator behind the push for finishing up those branches ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
fwiw, I'm +1 _because_ this is a visible improvement and new feature in gnome shell - we don't have much else to show in that area, this cycle...maybe thats me wearing a marketing rather than rel-eng hat ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:06 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Florian Müllnerg> wrote: > > > > In my opinion, both items make for some nice polish improvements in > > that area with low risk (the weather section is very isolated, and > > the > > visual refresh is mostly a style update), so they would make for a > > good (while late) 3.24 addition. > > I concur. +1 for the release team from me. I'm torn. I like the changes too: it looks like a good improvement. But it's a pretty major UI change in a significant component of the desktop shell, and going in very late in the release cycle. I'd prefer to save it for 3.26 to give users more time to comment on the change. So I won't give +1 myself, but I also won't block it if someone else wants to give the second +1. Michael ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Florian Müllnerwrote: > > > In my opinion, both items make for some nice polish improvements in > that area with low risk (the weather section is very isolated, and the > visual refresh is mostly a style update), so they would make for a > good (while late) 3.24 addition. > I concur. +1 for the release team from me. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hey everyone, I'd like to land some improvements to the date+time drop-down before entering beta. The bugs in question are: * https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754031 which adds weather information according to the location configuration from gnome-weather. This has been fairly high on the wishlist for a while (at least since 3.16), so I'm sure this will be a very welcome addition (and I'm sorry I only found time recently to finish up the patches) Note to translators: There's a big patch that adds non-capitalized versions of libgweather's condition strings. We will not land this, so there'll be a moderate eight additions. * https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775763 which streamlines the notification area's visuals according to Allan's latest mockups - see https://blogs.gnome.org/aday/2016/12/13/improving-notifications-in-gnome/ For reference, this is what the result looks like: https://people.gnome.org/~fmuellner/gnome-shell-calendar-refresh.png In my opinion, both items make for some nice polish improvements in that area with low risk (the weather section is very isolated, and the visual refresh is mostly a style update), so they would make for a good (while late) 3.24 addition. Cheers, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
String freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hey folks, sorry for the late request, but the bug in question[0] only came in today ... In the system menu, we'd like to link to the corresponding Settings panel in the Location submenu (like all other submenus do), which would add the new string Privacy Settings. -- Florian [0] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736542 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
1/2 from i18n Cheers 2014-09-12 12:04 GMT+02:00 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org: Hey folks, sorry for the late request, but the bug in question[0] only came in today ... In the system menu, we'd like to link to the corresponding Settings panel in the Location submenu (like all other submenus do), which would add the new string Privacy Settings. -- Florian [0] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736542 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
2/2 from i18n. -- Alexandre Franke ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... When the new status menu work landed, the Notification switch that used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. Cheers, Florian [0] https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Guidelines/SystemStatus/ [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707073 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
2013/10/10 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org: Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... When the new status menu work landed, the Notification switch that used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to approve a break in this cycle. -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On 10 October 2013 15:38, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/10/10 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org: Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... When the new status menu work landed, the Notification switch that used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to approve a break in this cycle. +1 for release team -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com, Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:38:42 +0200: 2013/10/10 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org: Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... When the new status menu work landed, the Notification switch that used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to approve a break in this cycle. 2/2 for i18n. Florian, please try to push the change ASAP so that translators have enough time to get their translations updated for the point release. Thank you, Petr Kovar ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org wrote: +1 for release team Second approval for the release team ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hi all, This cycle we redesigned the Shell overview, hiding the message tray by default from the view. The original design also added a new messages indicator to make the tray more discoverable, but it didn't make it in time for 3.7.90. Bug 687797 [1] contains a patchset that adds the indicator. Patches have been reviewed already and the request comes from the design team. OK to commit this? [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687787 Thanks, Cosimo ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Cosimo Cecchi cosimo.cec...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This cycle we redesigned the Shell overview, hiding the message tray by default from the view. The original design also added a new messages indicator to make the tray more discoverable, but it didn't make it in time for 3.7.90. Bug 687797 [1] contains a patchset that adds the indicator. Patches have been reviewed already and the request comes from the design team. OK to commit this? [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687787 Could you attach a screenshot to the bug ? That makes it much easier to judge such requests... ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Matthias Clasen Could you attach a screenshot to the bug ? That makes it much easier to judge such requests... Yeah I forgot about it...attached a screenshot now. Thanks, Cosimo ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Cosimo Cecchi wrote: This cycle we redesigned the Shell overview, hiding the message tray by default from the view. The original design also added a new messages indicator to make the tray more discoverable, but it didn't make it in time for 3.7.90. Bug 687797 [1] contains a patchset that adds the indicator. Patches have been reviewed already and the request comes from the design team. OK to commit this? 1 of 2 for the release team. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687787#c26 says: As for the style, I think it's best to leave that for Jakub or Allan to tweak - right now it's using a simple light gray to transparent gradient. It would be really great if those potential changes could also happen soon. Fred ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Cosimo Cecchi cosimo.cec...@gmail.com wrote: . Patches have been reviewed already and the request comes from the design team. OK to commit this? Thanks for the screenshot, looks good to me; I'll give an approval for the release team ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Another string freeze break request for GNOME Shell
El dj 11 de 10 de 2012 a les 18:48 +0200, en/na Florian Müllner va escriure: Hi, here are two more bugs that would be nice to include in 3.6.1: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672909 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685738 Either bug exposes a Shell keyboard shortcut in System Settings' keyboard panel (the latter bug also adds the shortcut in the first place, which means additional strings in the GSettings schema, but those are not really user-visible). The strings in question are Open the application menu and Show all applications which will appear as descriptions in System Settings - Keyboard - Shortcuts - System. We can certainly back out of adding the shortcut definitions in 3.6, but we believe that the benefit of documenting the existence of those shortcuts outweighs the inconsistency untranslated entries introduce (for locales that don't catch up until 3.6.1) - of course that's completely subjective, so feel free to disagree :-) Regards, Florian Hi, would be the last one? :) Anyway, 5~6 days left... could be doable: gnome-i18n 1/2 approval. Cheers, -- Gil Forcada [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network bloc: http://gil.badall.net planet: http://planet.guifi.net ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Another string freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Hi, here are two more bugs that would be nice to include in 3.6.1: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672909 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685738 Either bug exposes a Shell keyboard shortcut in System Settings' keyboard panel (the latter bug also adds the shortcut in the first place, which means additional strings in the GSettings schema, but those are not really user-visible). The strings in question are Open the application menu and Show all applications which will appear as descriptions in System Settings - Keyboard - Shortcuts - System. We can certainly back out of adding the shortcut definitions in 3.6, but we believe that the benefit of documenting the existence of those shortcuts outweighs the inconsistency untranslated entries introduce (for locales that don't catch up until 3.6.1) - of course that's completely subjective, so feel free to disagree :-) Regards, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
2012-09-18 20:33 keltezéssel, Giovanni Campagna írta: Hello release team, hello translators, I'd like to break the string freeze for gnome-shell for bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060. The main part of it is already solved, what is left out is handling DBus errors that might happen even if GDM is available and the right version. There is only one string, Authentication error, and in the normal case it should be never shown to the user. In fact, I've never experienced such problems myself, but https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684172 tells me otherwise. Without the patch, the shell is left with a broken greeter (half animated avatar, no prompt) or unlock dialog (full grey screen). With the patch, Authentication error is shown for a few seconds under the entry (in the same place as Authentication failed), and the greeter is reset or the lock screen curtain falls down again. Sounds serious enough, so i18n approval 1/2. Regards Gabor Kelemen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
2/2 from i18n. Cherrs, On Sep 19, 2012 9:09 AM, Gabor Kelemen kelem...@gnome.hu wrote: 2012-09-18 20:33 keltezéssel, Giovanni Campagna írta: Hello release team, hello translators, I'd like to break the string freeze for gnome-shell for bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/**show_bug.cgi?id=683060https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060. The main part of it is already solved, what is left out is handling DBus errors that might happen even if GDM is available and the right version. There is only one string, Authentication error, and in the normal case it should be never shown to the user. In fact, I've never experienced such problems myself, but https://bugzilla.gnome.org/**show_bug.cgi?id=684172https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684172tells me otherwise. Without the patch, the shell is left with a broken greeter (half animated avatar, no prompt) or unlock dialog (full grey screen). With the patch, Authentication error is shown for a few seconds under the entry (in the same place as Authentication failed), and the greeter is reset or the lock screen curtain falls down again. Sounds serious enough, so i18n approval 1/2. Regards Gabor Kelemen __**_ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/**mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18nhttps://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
String freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hello release team, hello translators, I'd like to break the string freeze for gnome-shell for bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060. The main part of it is already solved, what is left out is handling DBus errors that might happen even if GDM is available and the right version. There is only one string, Authentication error, and in the normal case it should be never shown to the user. In fact, I've never experienced such problems myself, but https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684172 tells me otherwise. Without the patch, the shell is left with a broken greeter (half animated avatar, no prompt) or unlock dialog (full grey screen). With the patch, Authentication error is shown for a few seconds under the entry (in the same place as Authentication failed), and the greeter is reset or the lock screen curtain falls down again. Thanks in advance, Giovanni ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote: With the patch, Authentication error is shown for a few seconds under the entry (in the same place as Authentication failed), and the greeter is reset or the lock screen curtain falls down again. Could you attach a screenshot on the bug so that the designers can give a quick thumbs-up as well? Thanks, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
2012/9/18 Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote: With the patch, Authentication error is shown for a few seconds under the entry (in the same place as Authentication failed), and the greeter is reset or the lock screen curtain falls down again. Could you attach a screenshot on the bug so that the designers can give a quick thumbs-up as well? Done now. Giovanni ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote: The patch looks good to me. I've asked #gnome-design to weigh in. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
In case it is still needed, I'm fine with these changes, second release team approval. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
2011-10-13 21:20 keltezéssel, Johannes Schmid írta: Hi! I think we discussed that already for the original break request, so 1 of 2 from i18n. Important enough for me, i18n approval 2/2. Regards Gabor Kelemen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On 13 October 2011 15:03, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote: So I'd like to request a UI freeze break for the addition of context menus (screenshot attached) and a string freeze break for the four strings introduced in the patch (Copy, Paste, Show Text, Hide Text). +1 from me, thanks for complete this for 3.2.1 -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 16:03 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote: On mar, 2011-09-20 at 16:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote: On lun, 2011-09-19 at 15:39 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: It's a -1 from me. A small visual incoherence is better then feature regression. Better wait 3.4 for a proper solution. I'm less worried about visual incoherence here, but rather about wrong usage of the switch widget[0], which might get picked up by application authors. And I assume we don't have checkboxes for shell dialogs...:-( I am not too worried about the 'feature' that we are temporarily losing here. I assume we can get context menus (and thus the ability to show passwords) in 3.2.1, Florian ? I'm not sure everyone is aware, but Owen was uncomfortable with the feature regression, so I backed out for 3.2 despite release team approval. I'm bringing it up again for 3.2.1, as the context menu patch is now ready to land[0] (but obviously requires another freeze break). So I'd like to request a UI freeze break for the addition of context menus (screenshot attached) and a string freeze break for the four strings introduced in the patch (Copy, Paste, Show Text, Hide Text). It doesn't appear we mention the switch in the help, so this won't invalidate anything. I would like to add a note about right-clicking to see the password to step 2 in net-wireless-connect.page. I can't do that now, because gnome-user-docs is frozen for 3.2.1. I'll give a docs team approval, with the understanding that we won't add the note in the help until 3.2.2. -- Shaun ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 16:03 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote: On mar, 2011-09-20 at 16:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote: On lun, 2011-09-19 at 15:39 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: It's a -1 from me. A small visual incoherence is better then feature regression. Better wait 3.4 for a proper solution. I'm less worried about visual incoherence here, but rather about wrong usage of the switch widget[0], which might get picked up by application authors. And I assume we don't have checkboxes for shell dialogs...:-( I am not too worried about the 'feature' that we are temporarily losing here. I assume we can get context menus (and thus the ability to show passwords) in 3.2.1, Florian ? I'm not sure everyone is aware, but Owen was uncomfortable with the feature regression, so I backed out for 3.2 despite release team approval. I'm bringing it up again for 3.2.1, as the context menu patch is now ready to land[0] (but obviously requires another freeze break). So I'd like to request a UI freeze break for the addition of context menus (screenshot attached) and a string freeze break for the four strings introduced in the patch (Copy, Paste, Show Text, Hide Text). Just to be sure: We're only talking about gnome-shell's password prompt here, and not the password entry on the Wireless Security tab when you edit a connection, right? -- Shaun ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
On jue, 2011-10-13 at 13:09 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote: Just to be sure: We're only talking about gnome-shell's password prompt here, and not the password entry on the Wireless Security tab when you edit a connection, right? Right. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hi! I think we discussed that already for the original break request, so 1 of 2 from i18n. Regards, Johannes ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Eeeks! Another freeze break request for gnome-shell ...
El ds 17 de 09 de 2011 a les 13:57 +0900, en/na Johannes Schmid va escriure: Hi! The patch adds a new user-visible string used in a notification. A little bit of background: gnome-shell's user menu now has two controls which interact - a switch to turn notifications off (formerly known as Busy) and a combo box to set the IM status. Now, when turning off notifications, the IM status is set automatically to busy, which is not exactly obvious (the reason being that without notifications, incoming messages are easily missed). We would like to pop up a notification in this case explaining the behavior. It adds two string (just for reference): +Main.notify(_(Your chat status will be set to busy), +_(Notifications are now disabled, including chat messages. Your online status has been adjusted to let others know that you might not see their messages.)); As the IM status/Notification status in gnome-shell was a real mess in 3.0 I think that change might help a lot and as we still have one release candidate it should be enough time for the two strings. So 1 of 2 from i18n. But I think you should definitly ping the docs-team about it as this should be convered in the docs. 2/2 from i18n, quite late but quite important. Cheers, Regards, Johannes ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n -- Gil Forcada [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network bloc: http://gil.badall.net planet: http://planet.guifi.net ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Eeeks! Another freeze break request for gnome-shell ...
Hi, I know this is very much a last-minute request, but I'd like to request another freeze break for bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652718 The patch adds a new user-visible string used in a notification. A little bit of background: gnome-shell's user menu now has two controls which interact - a switch to turn notifications off (formerly known as Busy) and a combo box to set the IM status. Now, when turning off notifications, the IM status is set automatically to busy, which is not exactly obvious (the reason being that without notifications, incoming messages are easily missed). We would like to pop up a notification in this case explaining the behavior. Regards, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Eeeks! Another freeze break request for gnome-shell ...
Hi! The patch adds a new user-visible string used in a notification. A little bit of background: gnome-shell's user menu now has two controls which interact - a switch to turn notifications off (formerly known as Busy) and a combo box to set the IM status. Now, when turning off notifications, the IM status is set automatically to busy, which is not exactly obvious (the reason being that without notifications, incoming messages are easily missed). We would like to pop up a notification in this case explaining the behavior. It adds two string (just for reference): +Main.notify(_(Your chat status will be set to busy), +_(Notifications are now disabled, including chat messages. Your online status has been adjusted to let others know that you might not see their messages.)); As the IM status/Notification status in gnome-shell was a real mess in 3.0 I think that change might help a lot and as we still have one release candidate it should be enough time for the two strings. So 1 of 2 from i18n. But I think you should definitly ping the docs-team about it as this should be convered in the docs. Regards, Johannes ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
On vie, 2011-09-09 at 19:07 +0200, Gabor Kelemen wrote: Approval 1/2. Ping? Could someone give me 2/2 (or voice his/her objections)? Regards, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
Le mercredi 14 septembre 2011 à 15:28 +0200, Florian Müllner a écrit : On vie, 2011-09-09 at 19:07 +0200, Gabor Kelemen wrote: Approval 1/2. Ping? Could someone give me 2/2 (or voice his/her objections)? 2/2, go, go, go :-) Claude ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request in gnome-shell
2011/9/7 Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com: I'd like to commit a patch from bug 658414 [1] to add context to two Sign In strings in login window. I need different translations for them in Polish (one is a button [2] and another is a window title/command [3]). I'm pretty sure some other languages need this too. We are in a string freeze period now, so I ask for your approval. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658414 [2] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/fingerprint.png [3] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/nologo.png Hi again, Could you please take a look at this? It's a simple patch, and I can remove fuzzy marks from already translated files if it helps. -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request in gnome-shell
On 09/09/2011 06:59 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: 2011/9/7 Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com: I'd like to commit a patch from bug 658414 [1] to add context to two Sign In strings in login window. I need different translations for them in Polish (one is a button [2] and another is a window title/command [3]). I'm pretty sure some other languages need this too. We are in a string freeze period now, so I ask for your approval. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658414 [2] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/fingerprint.png [3] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/nologo.png Hi again, Could you please take a look at this? It's a simple patch, and I can remove fuzzy marks from already translated files if it helps. *Don't* unfuzzy strings for other translation teams. You don't have enough knowledge about their languages and translation conventions to decide if existing translation is right for them. /Ihar ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request in gnome-shell
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/9/7 Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com: I'd like to commit a patch from bug 658414 [1] to add context to two Sign In strings in login window. I need different translations for them in Polish (one is a button [2] and another is a window title/command [3]). I'm pretty sure some other languages need this too. We are in a string freeze period now, so I ask for your approval. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658414 [2] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/fingerprint.png [3] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/nologo.png Hi again, Could you please take a look at this? It's a simple patch, and I can remove fuzzy marks from already translated files if it helps. No objections from me, so +1 for the release team. Helping to unfuzzy preexisting translations would probably be appreciated, but lets here what i18n has to say. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request in gnome-shell
2011/9/9 Ihar Hrachyshka ihar.hrachys...@gmail.com: *Don't* unfuzzy strings for other translation teams. You don't have enough knowledge about their languages and translation conventions to decide if existing translation is right for them. Sure thing. It was just a proposition, as current translations for both items are identical in every language. But you are probably right, I won't touch them. :) -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request in gnome-shell
2011-09-07 21:28 keltezéssel, Piotr Drąg írta: Hi, I'd like to commit a patch from bug 658414 [1] to add context to two Sign In strings in login window. I need different translations for them in Polish (one is a button [2] and another is a window title/command [3]). I'm pretty sure some other languages need this too. We are in a string freeze period now, so I ask for your approval. i18n approval 1/2, provided that no one touches fuzzy translations ;). Regards Gabor Kelemen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
On mié, 2011-09-07 at 22:12 +0200, Florian Müllner wrote: I'd like to request a freeze break for the following bugs: [...] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642135 This adds context to an existing string. After input from Friedel Wolff I changed the patch to add a translator comment instead of context, so the above bug no longer requires a freeze break. Regards, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell
2011-09-07 22:12 keltezéssel, Florian Müllner írta: Hey, I'd like to request a freeze break for the following bugs: - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644097 This is actually adding a string, so technically not a break, It is. Please read: http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes Aside from that, i18n approval 1/2. but while at it I'll include it in this request; the new string in question is %d%%, to allow translators to move the %-sign in front of the number or replace it with a more appropriate character. Most locales should be fine with the default, so the impact is low. - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642135 This adds context to an existing string. Unless there are objections, I'll push a follow-up patch which adjusts existing translations, so again the impact should be low. Now that you proposed to add only a comment and not a context, this is not a freeze break. Also, if you were adding a context marker, that would be used to change the *meaning* of the string, thus patching translations would be a very bad idea. For example, imagine someone who had translated this Volume as disk volume. By adding a context he would be forced to review the translation and hopefully he would detect the error. Removing the fuzzy mark would kill this opportunity. - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645037 This fixes a colloquialism in the original string. Again, I have a follow-up patch ready to adjust existing translations, so there should be no impact for translators. Usually, I'd say this is not important enough, but since we are already breaking freeze... approval 1/2. - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639987 Use ngettext for timeouts in session dialogs (You will be logged out in X seconds.). Obviously this affects existing translations. Approval 1/2. Regards Gabor Kelemen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request in gnome-shell
El dv 09 de 09 de 2011 a les 18:25 +0200, en/na Gabor Kelemen va escriure: 2011-09-07 21:28 keltezéssel, Piotr Drąg írta: Hi, I'd like to commit a patch from bug 658414 [1] to add context to two Sign In strings in login window. I need different translations for them in Polish (one is a button [2] and another is a window title/command [3]). I'm pretty sure some other languages need this too. We are in a string freeze period now, so I ask for your approval. i18n approval 1/2, provided that no one touches fuzzy translations ;). 2/2 and I agree with Gabor, please let us handle fuzziness. Cheers, Regards Gabor Kelemen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n -- Gil Forcada [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network bloc: http://gil.badall.net planet: http://planet.guifi.net ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request in gnome-shell
2011/9/9 Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org: El dv 09 de 09 de 2011 a les 18:25 +0200, en/na Gabor Kelemen va escriure: i18n approval 1/2, provided that no one touches fuzzy translations ;). 2/2 and I agree with Gabor, please let us handle fuzziness. Of course. This is committed and pushed now. Thank you all. -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
String freeze break request in gnome-shell
Hi, I'd like to commit a patch from bug 658414 [1] to add context to two Sign In strings in login window. I need different translations for them in Polish (one is a button [2] and another is a window title/command [3]). I'm pretty sure some other languages need this too. We are in a string freeze period now, so I ask for your approval. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658414 [2] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/fingerprint.png [3] http://people.gnome.org/~halfline/nologo.png -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
String freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hey, I'd like to request a freeze break for the following bugs: - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644097 This is actually adding a string, so technically not a break, but while at it I'll include it in this request; the new string in question is %d%%, to allow translators to move the %-sign in front of the number or replace it with a more appropriate character. Most locales should be fine with the default, so the impact is low. - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642135 This adds context to an existing string. Unless there are objections, I'll push a follow-up patch which adjusts existing translations, so again the impact should be low. - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645037 This fixes a colloquialism in the original string. Again, I have a follow-up patch ready to adjust existing translations, so there should be no impact for translators. - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639987 Use ngettext for timeouts in session dialogs (You will be logged out in X seconds.). Obviously this affects existing translations. Regards, Florian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011, à 10:11 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu lucian.griji...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:43 AM, David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com wrote: this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); The string is from https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Whiteboards/AuthorizationDialog From the screenshots Incorrect password. Please try again seems sufficient. If something more generic is needed wouldn't Authentication failed. Please try again suffice? I recommend staying with the current design and just adding a translator comment if it is required. I went ahead and added a translator comment; didn't request any freeze break as it's just a comment. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hi, On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 18:05 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 22:54 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 21.55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas ha scritto: this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); Sorry for the late reply, I've seen this change was yet committed, but this message is really really really hard to translate. That what?? Could you please at least add a translator comment, in order to help us to provide an optimal translation/adaptation? David Zeuthen would have the best idea whether some useful comment is possible, since this is from the PolicyKit authentication dialogs. David? The string is from https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Whiteboards/AuthorizationDialog and showed when authentication fails. Jon McCann came up with it, so if you need to change it probably best to talk to him (added as Cc). Feel free to add a translator comment saying this or let me know if you want me to do that. Thanks, David ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:43 AM, David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com wrote: this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); The string is from https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Whiteboards/AuthorizationDialog From the screenshots Incorrect password. Please try again seems sufficient. If something more generic is needed wouldn't Authentication failed. Please try again suffice? -- . ..: Lucian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu lucian.griji...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:43 AM, David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com wrote: this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); The string is from https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Whiteboards/AuthorizationDialog From the screenshots Incorrect password. Please try again seems sufficient. If something more generic is needed wouldn't Authentication failed. Please try again suffice? I recommend staying with the current design and just adding a translator comment if it is required. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell: terminology update
ma., 21.03.2011 kl. 13.30 -0400, skrev Johannes Schmid: Hi Phil! I'd like to ask for a small string freeze break to update some terminology in gnome-shell. Only one string is affected; please see bug 645418: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645418 1 of 2. This is a really small and reasonable change to fix the terminologie. 2 of 2. Cheers Kjartan ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hi! No freeze break for i18n - I guess nobody would object code changes are minimal but I am not the release-team. Regards, Johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 21.55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas ha scritto: this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); Sorry for the late reply, I've seen this change was yet committed, but this message is really really really hard to translate. That what?? Could you please at least add a translator comment, in order to help us to provide an optimal translation/adaptation? Thanks, Luca ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 22:54 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 21.55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas ha scritto: this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); Sorry for the late reply, I've seen this change was yet committed, but this message is really really really hard to translate. That what?? Could you please at least add a translator comment, in order to help us to provide an optimal translation/adaptation? David Zeuthen would have the best idea whether some useful comment is possible, since this is from the PolicyKit authentication dialogs. David? - Owen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 22:54 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 21.55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas ha scritto: this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); Sorry for the late reply, I've seen this change was yet committed, but this message is really really really hard to translate. That what?? For the time being, translators could probably use Action failed instead. andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 21:55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote: + text: _(), I don't think that line makes sense. Apart from that see http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes : The following types of changes do not need explicit approval, however we would still very much like them to be announced so that we know about them: * Marking a message for translation that was previously not marked for translation by accident. andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 21:58 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 21:55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote: + text: _(), I don't think that line makes sense. Actually it's even wrong: http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/DevGuidelines/Don%27t%20mark%20empty%20strings%20for%20translation Apart from that see http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes : The following types of changes do not need explicit approval, however we would still very much like them to be announced so that we know about them: * Marking a message for translation that was previously not marked for translation by accident. andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 21:55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote: + text: _(), I don't think that line makes sense. Yeah, that will bring in the translation metadata... Apart from that see http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes : The following types of changes do not need explicit approval, however we would still very much like them to be announced so that we know about them: * Marking a message for translation that was previously not marked for translation by accident. Its still a code change, so +1/2 for that, assuming you unmark that empty string. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 21:55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote: Hi. Found some strings that weren't marked for translation in the correct way in gnome-shell. Patch attached...ok to commit? OK with me to commit, except for the pointed out _('') which should be changed to and not translated at all. - Owen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
Le mercredi 23 mars 2011, à 17:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 21:55 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote: + text: _(), I don't think that line makes sense. Yeah, that will bring in the translation metadata... Apart from that see http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes : The following types of changes do not need explicit approval, however we would still very much like them to be announced so that we know about them: * Marking a message for translation that was previously not marked for translation by accident. Its still a code change, so +1/2 for that, assuming you unmark that empty string. Approval 2 of 2. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Code freeze break request for gnome-shell
Hi. Found some strings that weren't marked for translation in the correct way in gnome-shell. Patch attached...ok to commit? Cheers Kjartan From 509bc59467900eaf2b13d3d1e87c9e9b1687fe4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kjartan Maraas kmar...@gnome.org Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:49:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Mark strings for translation in the right way --- js/ui/polkitAuthenticationAgent.js | 14 +++--- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/js/ui/polkitAuthenticationAgent.js b/js/ui/polkitAuthenticationAgent.js index 22535b7..9c682cf 100644 --- a/js/ui/polkitAuthenticationAgent.js +++ b/js/ui/polkitAuthenticationAgent.js @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ AuthenticationDialog.prototype = { { y_align: St.Align.START }); this._subjectLabel = new St.Label({ style_class: 'polkit-dialog-headline', -text: _('Authentication Required') }); +text: _(Authentication Required) }); messageBox.add(this._subjectLabel, { y_fill: false, @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ AuthenticationDialog.prototype = { let userIsRoot = false; if (userName == 'root') { userIsRoot = true; -userRealName = _('Administrator'); +userRealName = _(Administrator); } if (userIsRoot) { @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ AuthenticationDialog.prototype = { this._passwordLabel = new St.Label(({ style_class: 'polkit-dialog-password-label' })); this._passwordBox.add(this._passwordLabel); this._passwordEntry = new St.Entry({ style_class: 'polkit-dialog-password-entry', - text: _(''), + text: _(), can_focus: true}); this._passwordEntry.clutter_text.connect('activate', Lang.bind(this, this._onEntryActivate)); this._passwordBox.add(this._passwordEntry, @@ -169,11 +169,11 @@ AuthenticationDialog.prototype = { messageBox.add(this._nullMessageLabel); this._nullMessageLabel.show(); -this.setButtons([{ label: _('Cancel'), +this.setButtons([{ label: _(Cancel), action: Lang.bind(this, this.cancel), key:Clutter.Escape }, - { label: _('Authenticate'), + { label: _(Authenticate), action: Lang.bind(this, this._onAuthenticateButtonPressed) }]); @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ AuthenticationDialog.prototype = { * show Sorry, that didn't work. Please try again. */ if (!this._errorMessageLabel.visible !this._wasDismissed) { -this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_('Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.')); +this._errorMessageLabel.set_text(_(Sorry, that didn\'t work. Please try again.)); this._errorMessageLabel.show(); this._infoMessageLabel.hide(); this._nullMessageLabel.hide(); @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ AuthenticationDialog.prototype = { _onSessionRequest: function(session, request, echo_on) { // Cheap localization trick if (request == 'Password:') -this._passwordLabel.set_text(_('Password:')); +this._passwordLabel.set_text(_(Password:)); else this._passwordLabel.set_text(request); -- 1.7.4.1 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
String freeze break request for gnome-shell: terminology update
Hi guys, I'd like to ask for a small string freeze break to update some terminology in gnome-shell. Only one string is affected; please see bug 645418: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645418 Thanks, Phil -- Phil Bull https://launchpad.net/~philbull Book - http://nostarch.com/ubuntu4.htm ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String freeze break request for gnome-shell: terminology update
Hi Phil! I'd like to ask for a small string freeze break to update some terminology in gnome-shell. Only one string is affected; please see bug 645418: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645418 1 of 2. This is a really small and reasonable change to fix the terminologie. Regards, Johannes ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n