GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
Indeed, that is really bad. The CoC project is all hidden, doesn't even show up
in the list of projects, so I wouldn't have expected any form of information
around.
I'll try to see if there is an open issue about this GitLab upstream.
I also made
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
Just in case I wasn't clear, whatever is easier for you Andrea and Jehan, no
hard requirements here. Just wondering together with you the best way forward
:-)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
It seems very specific to the situation of GIMP i.e. they use CircleCI which is
not something we use elsewhere in GNOME, and it can only pull from GitHub. So I
think we can help with a tailored solution here i.e. by just cloning somewhere
the gimp
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
Done, seems there are no maintainers nowadays so probably good idea to have at
least one :-)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/157#note_552543
You're receiving
Issue was closed by GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano
Issue #157: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/157
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/157
You're receiving this email because of your
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
Sorry for the delay. The board is working on a process to make the question of
what is considered GNOME software a more straightforward decision. I think
there are two options here:
1. Move this now to the World group.
1. Wait until we finalise
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
Sounds good to me!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/198#note_739606
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
> Note that the question here is not whether gnome-screencast is a GNOME
> project, but whether it can be uploaded to a new repository in the GNOME
> namespace. That distinction is one we started to make when moving to gitlab.
Right, di
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
And forgot to mention, I do understand the furstration. I also believe we
should have some interim solution, since it's taking signitifacntly longer that
I would have expected. I will have some chats around and see if we come up with
something
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
@hadess I see, I guess a good oportunity for us to talk with daniels about this
and discuss ideas.
@mcatanzaro sorry, I didn't see your comment before. Unfortunately, what is
obvious to you might not be obvious to someone else, and it's
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
@hadess just to understand your issue, is this because fdo has a similar
policy? Or are you saying that for some reason you are not able to create
repositories in your personal space at GNOME gitlab and therefore need to use
fdo personal space
GitLab Admin - Carlos Soriano commented:
Andrea, remember that we created the gitlab-abuse-repo...@gnome.org shared
mailing list where we sent the abuse reports to, which includes the coc
committee. It's not as fancy as the admin area for abuse reports, but contains
the exact same text
12 matches
Mail list logo
