Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/17/2010 6:48 PM, RJack wrote:
Whatever (unverifiable) source code that is provided out there (if
in fact there is any) is years old, out of datesource modules that
mock the claim gaining compliance. You simply can't verify what's
posted out there any more than you can
On 2/18/2010 11:38 AM, RJack wrote:
Claiming it is very easy is just another unverified claim. You're
entitled to your own opinion but not your own unverified facts. Sorry.
Claiming that my claim is unverified is very easy, but false.
I have explained how verification can be accomplished - use
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
I have explained how verification can be accomplished - use the
sources to build the binary, and see if that binary matches the
distributed one.
Why don't you try to perform your own verification and post here the
results, silly Hyman?
regards,
alexander.
P.S. It is
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/18/2010 11:38 AM, RJack wrote:
Claiming it is very easy is just another unverified claim. You're
entitled to your own opinion but not your own unverified facts.
Sorry.
Claiming that my claim is unverified is very easy, but false. I have
explained how verification
On 2/18/2010 12:45 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Why don't you try to perform your own verification and post
here the results
Because I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux
system so that I can do the builds.
___
gnu-misc-discuss
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/18/2010 12:45 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Why don't you try to perform your own verification and post
here the results
Because I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux
system so that I can do the builds.
Stop making an utter idiot of yourself,
On 2/18/2010 12:46 PM, RJack wrote:
They're *your* unverified claims. Neither myself nor, I doubt, anyone
else is going to foolishly carry *your* burden and produce *your*
facts for you.
Your facts require the belief that after settling the lawsuits,
the defendants set up the ability for
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
On 2/18/2010 12:46 PM, RJack wrote:
They're *your* unverified claims. Neither myself nor, I doubt, anyone
else is going to foolishly carry *your* burden and produce *your*
facts for you.
Your facts require the belief that after settling the lawsuits,
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
to do so make their local changes. If that renders the router
Go try making local changes regarding
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
and report your results back here, silly dak. It won't happen, I know,
you silly dak.
regards,
alexander.
On 2/18/2010 2:30 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Go try making local changes regarding
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
and report your results back here
The online distribution of GPLed firmware by Verizon is
accompanied by source found at
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[magical source code]
available at http://opensource.actiontec.com/, and
offer physical copies for $10 as well.
Why don't you try it yourself (checking whether the offered source code
corresponds to the complete corresponding source code under the GNU
GPL), silly Hyman? Is
On 2/18/2010 3:29 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Why don't you try it yourself (checking whether the offered source code
corresponds to the complete corresponding source code under the GNU
GPL)? Is it because you are insufficiently motivated to go
set up a GNU/Linux system so that you can do the
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... excuse ...]
Stop making claims that you can't support with evidence, silly Hyman.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds.
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. It is
On 2/18/2010 3:48 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Stop making claims that you can't support with evidence.
The defendants in each of the SFLC cases now have web sites
from which they serve the GPLed sources for the binaries they
distribute. If a GPL crank wishes to assert that these sources
do
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... crank ... crank ... crank ... crank ...]
Take your meds and call your doctor, retard Hyman.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I can do the builds.
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/18/2010 2:30 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Go try making local changes regarding
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp and report
your results back here
The online distribution of GPLed firmware by Verizon is accompanied
by source found at
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
to do so make their local changes. If that renders the router
Go try making local changes regarding
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
and report your results back here, silly dak. It won't happen,
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... excuse ...]
Stop making claims that you can't support with evidence, silly Hyman.
How about doing that yourself?
--
David Kastrup
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
On 2/18/2010 4:30 PM, RJack wrote:
Your links lead back to an old Actiontec site -- not Verizon.
What does old mean? Alexander's beloved page,
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp,
links to
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... excuse ...]
Stop making claims that you can't support with evidence, silly Hyman.
How about doing that yourself?
What evidence do you want from me stupid dak? That
On 2/18/2010 5:26 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
is not backed by the complete corresponding source code under the GNU
GPL
The online distribution of GPLed firmware by Verizon is
accompanied by source found at
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... excuse ...]
Stop making claims that you can't support with evidence, silly Hyman.
How about doing that yourself?
What evidence do you want from
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... ResidentialHelp ...]
Yes, you really need it (Residential Help) Hyman.
But it has nothing to do with the missing complete corresponding source
code under the GNU GPL for
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
you retard.
regards,
alexander.
P.S.
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
What evidence do you want from me stupid dak? That
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
is not backed by the complete corresponding source code under the GNU
GPL you silly?
You got the links already.
Now tell me that you really tried
On 2/18/2010 5:41 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
But it has nothing to do with the missing complete corresponding source
code under the GNU GPL for
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
The online distribution of GPLed firmware by Verizon is
accompanied by source found at
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
The version numbers on the source and binary links match.
LOL!!! But what makes you think that it is a complete corresponding
source code under the GNU GPL, silly Hyman?
regards,
alexander.
P.S. I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system
so that I
On 2/18/2010 6:02 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
The version numbers on the source and binary links match.
LOL!!! But what makes you think that it is a complete corresponding
source code under the GNU GPL?
Because Verizon and Actiontec are making the source code
available,
On 2/18/2010 6:14 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman, are seriously claiming that they are complete corresponding
source code under the GNU GPL for
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
Yes.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/18/2010 5:46 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Now tell me that you really tried to visit those links (Hyman's
Residential Help links) and build the binaries from that 'source'
you silly dak. Did you try that?
The version numbers on the source and binary links match.
29 matches
Mail list logo
