* Martin [2021-03-30 19:58]:
> > Instead of open source, we say, free software or free (libre)
> > software.
> This is absurd, I would never use only "free software" term for the exactly
> same reason I'm not using only the word "open-source".
You may, but we don't, as it is vague term. On GNU
On 3/30/21 1:38 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
* Martin [2021-03-30 15:51]:
This kind of stories also have some pros. That time Jabber/XMPP network was
getting big "free" promotion from Facebook, Google, etc. Nowadays I'm still
using Jabber/XMPP and I have zero interest of having fb, g+, etc.
I don't
On 3/30/21 12:58 PM, Martin wrote:
> Nowadays almost every end user is verifying PGP signatures, it's not a
> rocket science anymore.
no they aren't and it is not rocket science, it is just poorly designed
and worstly implimented.
On 3/29/21 12:26 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
* Martin [2021-03-29 13:57]:
From the paragraph above, I can see you did not get the difference
between the free software and open souce. And your analogy is not
right. You mentioned price not freedom.
I know that gnu definition and in general I'm on your
On 3/30/21 9:10 AM, Jean Louis wrote:
* Martin [2021-03-30 11:07]:
On 3/29/21 12:26 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
I do not think that Facebook is freeware software, it is cloud service
provider. There are Facebook applications and messengers, maybe you
mean those? See:
* Martin [2021-03-30 15:51]:
> This kind of stories also have some pros. That time Jabber/XMPP network was
> getting big "free" promotion from Facebook, Google, etc. Nowadays I'm still
> using Jabber/XMPP and I have zero interest of having fb, g+, etc.
I don't remember that neither Google nor
* Martin [2021-03-30 11:07]:
> On 3/29/21 12:26 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
> > * Martin [2021-03-29 13:57]:
> > From the paragraph above, I can see you did not get the difference
> > between the free software and open source. And your analogy is not
> > right. You mentioned price not freedom.
> I
* Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) <936-846-2...@kylheku.com> [2021-03-26 19:02]:
> Those incidents could have been "innocent" in the sense that
> the person was really just working on their own and actually member
> of [FOOBAR group], just with a really oboxious personality and
> way of thinking.
>
Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 29/03/2021 12:59, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 29/03/2021 02:49, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote:
: host eggs.gnu.org[209.51.188.92] said: 550 bad domain -
email
sysad...@fsf.org for details (in reply to RCPT TO command)
: host
* Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) <936-846-2...@kylheku.com> [2021-03-29 17:52]:
> To be confident, I would need inside information: what the mail exchanger
> is and how it is configured.
I had that error once too with eggs.gnu.org and I do not think that
Libreplanet human mailing list managers
* Daniel Pocock [2021-03-29 13:59]:
> If the roles were reversed, if de Blanc was a male harassing a female
> boss, past or present, there would already be a restraining order. The
> police handle such cases in the same manner as domestic violence. But
> because de Blanc is female, she seems to
* Martin [2021-03-29 13:57]:
> On 3/28/21 6:47 AM, Jean Louis wrote:
> > * shulie [2021-03-27 21:28]:
> > > On 3/24/21 10:55 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> > > > As I understand, RMS always thought that proprietary software
> > > > companies would make some kind of large legal attack on the GNU
On 3/28/21 6:47 AM, Jean Louis wrote:
* shulie [2021-03-27 21:28]:
On 3/24/21 10:55 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
As I understand, RMS always thought that proprietary software
companies would make some kind of large legal attack on the GNU project,
no - this is just how the extreme left works
13 matches
Mail list logo
