On 2/10/2010 6:36 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
RJack didn't wrote that actiontec.com is verizon.net
In this matter, Actiontec is acting as Verizon's agent.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Every lawsuit filed by the SFLC has ended successfully with the
defendants coming into compliance with the GPL. I can only imagine
how much more could accomplished by competent attorneys!
Surely you are not referring to the SFLC's attorneys?
THAT'S HERESY HYMAN
On 2/11/2010 11:36 AM, RJack wrote:
Surely you are not referring to the SFLC's attorneys?
THAT'S HERESY HYMAN `
I shouldn't be surprised that irony is lost on you too.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 6:36 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
RJack didn't wrote that actiontec.com is verizon.net
In this matter, Actiontec is acting as Verizon's agent.
Who said to you that Actiontec is Verizon's agent/not acting on its own
behalf, stypid Hyman?
regards,
On 2/11/2010 2:30 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Who said to you that Actiontec is Verizon's agent/not
acting on its own behalf
The fact that Verizon web pages point to Actiontec
web sites and use Actiontec addresses, as you yourself
showed.
___
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/11/2010 2:30 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Who said to you that Actiontec is Verizon's agent/not
acting on its own behalf
The fact that Verizon web pages point to Actiontec
web sites and use Actiontec addresses, as you yourself
showed.
Take your meds Hyman.
Take your meds, Hyman.
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 10:08 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar the
entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from SFLC for
consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 10:39 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Erik Andersen's alleged (and fraudulent in fact) claim of ownership
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
In addition to the copyright notices, McFarlane registered
copyright on the issues and the
On 2/10/2010 11:02 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
ownership of
computer source code (aka a computer program work under 17 USC 101)
has nothing to do with ownership as compiler as in 17 USC 101
'compilation'. Nor has it anything to do with ownership of separate and
independant works such
Take your meds, Hyman.
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 11:02 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
ownership of
computer source code (aka a computer program work under 17 USC 101)
has nothing to do with ownership as compiler as in 17 USC 101
'compilation'. Nor has it anything to do with
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Take your meds, Hyman.
How would that help your running out of arguments?
--
David Kastrup
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Take your meds, Hyman.
How would that help your running out of arguments?
Hyman just can't grok it. Or rather he is simply acting as an utter
moron just for fun, I think.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 11:30 AM, RJack wrote:
The plaintiffs chose to file automatic involuntary dismissals
The words chose and involuntary don't go together.
You appear to have ongoing difficulties with the English
And there is absolutely no chance at all that RJack simply
On 2/10/2010 11:57 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
And there is absolutely no chance at all that RJack simply mistyped it
either inintentionally or with intent to show what a sucker you are with
your difficulties with the English reply?
Actually, I thought that it was written by you - I didn't
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 11:57 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
And there is absolutely no chance at all that RJack simply mistyped it
either inintentionally or with intent to show what a sucker you are with
your difficulties with the English reply?
Actually, I thought that it was
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
http://www22.verizon.com/ResidentialHelp/FiOSInternet/Networking/Troubleshooting/QuestionsOne/124346.htm.
Verizon also makes source available through the offer of
a physical copy for no more than distribution costs ($10)
listed on the same page.
Uh MORON Hyman:
GPL
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
Notice here that he says a copyright owner not the copyright
owner.
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf
20. Mr. Andersen is the author and developer of the BusyBox computer
program, and the owner of copyrights in that
On 2/10/2010 2:43 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
Notice here that he says a copyright owner not the copyright
owner.
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf
20. Mr. Andersen is the author and developer of the BusyBox computer
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 2:24 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
GPL Code Requests
4250 Buckingham Drive Suite #400
Colorado Springs, Co 80907
Right?
Now,
http://www.manta.com/coms2/dnbcompany_6f3dp
Actiontec Electronics, Inc (Actiontec)
4250 Buckingham Dr # 400
On 2/10/2010 3:19 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
The SFLC has sued Verizon
True.
(the case was then quickly dismissed with prejudice against plaintiffs
The case was quickly dismissed by the plaintiffs, not
against the plaintiffs, because the sides settled. It
is common to dismiss a case with
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
settlement is reached, so that the defendants can be
confident that the plaintiffs will not attempt to
re-litigate the issue.
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/06/verizon-ceo-doesnt-know-about.html
LAS VEGAS -- I just got out of a QA session with Verizon
On 2/10/2010 3:57 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/06/verizon-ceo-doesnt-know-about.html
As evidence that Verizon does know about the GPL, see
http://www22.verizon.com/residentialhelp/fiosinternet/networking/setup/questionstwo/98770.htm
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
As evidence that Verizon does know about the GPL, see
http://www22.verizon.com/resi. . .
Verizon does know about many things and nobody disputes that Verizon
does know something about the GPL, you retard Hyman.
But:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
Where is the complete corresponding source code regarding the complete
binary code above?
Please share with us the location of the complete corresponding source
code (re: complete binary code at
On 2/10/2010 5:28 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
actiontec.com is NOT verizon.net
Rjack wrote:
Agency is an area of commercial law dealing with a contractual or
quasi-contractual tripartite, or non-contractual set of relationships
when an agent is authorized to act on behalf of
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 5:28 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
actiontec.com is NOT verizon.net
Rjack wrote:
RJack didn't wrote that actiontec.com is verizon.net, YOU MORON HYMAN.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
All the plaintiffs need to show is that Andersen holds
copyright in a part of BusyBox, and that the defendants
are copying and distributing it without permission.
http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2010/02/08/copyrights-and-wrongs/
Larry Rosen correctly noted:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 5:28 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
actiontec.com is NOT verizon.net
Rjack wrote: Agency is an area of commercial law dealing with a
contractual or quasi-contractual tripartite, or non-contractual set
of relationships when an agent is authorized to act on
28 matches
Mail list logo
