[For Hyman The Retard] Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract [1] Elements and Case Citations (1) Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract; (2) Plaintiff is not a party to the contract; (3) The parties to the contract intended that the contract primarily or directly benefit plaintiff or a class

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread Hyman Rosen
On 4/20/2010 4:55 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract [1] Elements and Case Citations (1) Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract; (2) Plaintiff is not a party to the contract; (3) The parties to the contract intended that the contract

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Hyman Rosen wrote: On 4/20/2010 4:55 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract [1] Elements and Case Citations (1) Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract; (2) Plaintiff is not a party to the contract; (3) The parties to the contract

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread Hyman Rosen
On 4/20/2010 5:20 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: Because that's the right way to enforce third-party beneficiary contracts But the GPL is not a third-party beneficiary contract, it's a simple copyright license. You are very confused. ___

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread John Hasler
Hyman Rosen writes: You are very confused. I don't think he is confused at all. It's all quite deliberate. He's trolling. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread RJack
Hyman Rosen wrote: On 4/20/2010 4:55 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract [1] Elements and Case Citations (1) Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract; (2) Plaintiff is not a party to the contract; (3) The parties to the contract intended

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread Hyman Rosen
On 4/20/2010 10:41 PM, RJack wrote: And the rights holders are excluded as beneficiaries of the GPL contract. The distribution is to other all third parties. What in the world are you talking about? 23. Under the License, Mr. Andersen grants certain permissions to other parties to copy,

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread RJack
Hyman Rosen wrote: On 4/20/2010 10:41 PM, RJack wrote: And the rights holders are excluded as beneficiaries of the GPL contract. The distribution is to other all third parties. What in the world are you talking about? 23. Under the License, Mr. Andersen grants certain permissions to other

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes: On 4/21/2010 9:28 AM, RJack wrote: Hyman Rosen wrote: Where do you see any distribution to all third parties? You are just amazingly confused. You must cause any work that *YOU DISTRIBUTE* or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from

Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida

2010-05-04 Thread Hyman Rosen
On 4/21/2010 9:28 AM, RJack wrote: Hyman Rosen wrote: Where do you see any distribution to all third parties? You are just amazingly confused. You must cause any work that *YOU DISTRIBUTE* or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be