Hendrik Belitz wrote:
[...]
>
> Nevertheless, thanks to you guys who provided me with some useful
> answers. Alexander, your link was pretty informative, but the author
> also states several times that he is not quite sure whether his
> viewpoint on software combinations is fully correct w.r.t. t
interpreting a lax greeting by a person who's native language isn't
English at all as a political or even juridical statement and using
it to start a flame war out of nothing - looks like a kind of real
bad habit to me.
Please excuse David, he loves starting flamewars about anything an
Whoah,
interpreting a lax greeting by a person who's native language isn't
English at all as a political or even juridical statement and using it
to start a flame war out of nothing - looks like a kind of real bad
habit to me.
Nevertheless, thanks to you guys who provided me with some useful
answ
Alfred M\. Szmidt writes:
> Prohibiting staff from distributing free software is the same as a NDA,
> in my opinion.
It isn't an opinion. It is law.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Again, you resort to petty insults, and spreading misinformation.
Nobody claimed anything about everybody, maybe English isn't a
language you are proficient in--which is perfectly fine--but "us" does
not refer to everyone.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing l
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>Dear open-source-fellows,
>>>
>>> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of
>>> the Free software movement, and promote freedom.
>>
>>Please do not confuse yourself with every reader
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>Dear open-source-fellows,
>>>
>>> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of
>>> the Free software movement, and promote freedom.
>>
>>Please do not confuse yourself with every reader
>>Dear open-source-fellows,
>>
>> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of
>> the Free software movement, and promote freedom.
>
>Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list.
>Speak for yourself, not for others.
>>Dear open-source-fellows,
>>
>> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of
>> the Free software movement, and promote freedom.
>
>Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list.
>Speak for yourself, not for others.
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Dear open-source-fellows,
>>
>> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
>> software movement, and promote freedom.
>
>Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list.
>Speak for
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Dear open-source-fellows,
>>
>> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
>> software movement, and promote freedom.
>
>Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list.
>Speak for
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>
>>Dear open-source-fellows,
>>
>> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
>> software movement, and promote freedom.
Translation: GPL restrictions. (English-GNUish dictionary.)
>
>Please do not confuse yourself wi
>Dear open-source-fellows,
>
> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
> software movement, and promote freedom.
Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list.
Speak for yourself, not for others. If you absolutely feel
compelle
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Dear open-source-fellows,
> >
> > Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
> > software movement, and promote freedom.
>
> Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list.
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Dear open-source-fellows,
>
> Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
> software movement, and promote freedom.
Please do not confuse yourself with every reader of this list. Speak
for yourself, not for others. If
Dear open-source-fellows,
Please do not confuse us with this movement, we are part of the Free
software movement, and promote freedom. See
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html for
further information.
I started developing a project some time ago and want to make it
Dear open-source-fellows,
I started developing a project some time ago and want to make it
public in the near future. Therefore, I tried to find the most
suitable licensing strategy for my stuff which (optionally) depends on
a whole bunch of supporting libraries, which means I have find a
license
Hendrik Belitz wrote:
[...]
> My actual question is: What license am I able to use for my own lib.
Whichever you want. Don't take all that GNUtian "compatibility"
nonsense seriously. See
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
regards,
alexander.
18 matches
Mail list logo
