Rahul Dhesi c.c.ei...@xrexxcopyr.usenet.us.com wrote in message
news:go7vgf$4p...@blue.rahul.net...
amicus_curious a...@sti.net writes:
I don't know that they are afraid of Verizon, I think that they do
understand the meaning of dismissed with predjudice though and have no
way
to complain
Thufir Hawat hawat.thu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:1blpl.46156$ci2.13...@newsfe09.iad...
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:26:56 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
Does the binary file which is being distributed reside on the verizon
server? If so, then Verizon would be required to make the source
amicus_curious a...@sti.net wrote:
Who? Tomtom?
In europe? (I presume as they're a european company, that's where the
trial
will be held...?)
It will be held in the US District Court for the Western District of
Washington at Seattle.
If not, tomtom could just utterly ignore anything
Andrew Halliwell wrote:
amicus_curious a...@sti.net wrote:
Who? Tomtom?
In europe? (I presume as they're a european company, that's where the
trial
will be held...?)
It will be held in the US District Court for the Western District of
Washington at Seattle.
If not, tomtom
Andrew Halliwell spi...@ponder.sky.com writes:
Tom-Tom is free to abandon the US market if they wish to avoid US courts, of
course, but the profits here are just too tempting. It is the same way with
Mr. Softee in the EU. They cover their higher costs of business by raising
prices a
On 2009-02-27, Andrew Halliwell spi...@ponder.sky.com wrote:
amicus_curious a...@sti.net wrote:
What can you do with it as a connected device other than perhaps replace the
internal mapping data with a newer version?
This is hardly a compelling use. That mapping data is expensive enough
Andrew Halliwell spi...@ponder.sky.com wrote in message
news:bd8l76-lk8@ponder.sky.com...
amicus_curious a...@sti.net wrote:
Who? Tomtom?
In europe? (I presume as they're a european company, that's where the
trial
will be held...?)
It will be held in the US District Court for the
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
No, copyright law grants a monopoly on what may be done (e.g., copying,
public performance, ...), not where it may be done (who owns the server).
Copyright law contains exceptions and distinctions for digital
copying over networks. And when a user initiates an action from
a
Rjack wrote:
It won't convince many people but do your best
I never expect to convince the GPL opponents, but I will
do my best to counter their incorrect statements when they
make them, for the benefit of the few other readers who
have not yet killfiled us.
Rjack wrote:
Are ..
AKA Gary M ..
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
During a presentation at the Southern California Linux Expo, Software
Freedom Law Center technical director Bradley Kuhn explained how the
free software community can overcome the challenges posed by cloud
computing ..
Rjack wrote:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/99-1551P.ZO
The above ruling is *binding* on every federal court in the land.
The above ruling is was about a court dismissing a case
upon the merits, not a voluntary dismissal by the plaintiffs.
Not only that, the Supreme Court concluded
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
copying over networks. And when a user initiates an action from
a browser that goes to a webserver which obtains a file from
Hugh? In the case of
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
the initiator of an action relevant to the copyright laws is
Doug Mentohl wrote:
Rjack wrote:
Are ..
AKA Gary M .. http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/
I didn't see me. Please submit my name for at least an honorable
mention.
Why not frequent a moderated group where you are less apt to be
provoked into fits of childish whining? Killfiles are another
Rjack wrote:
I ..
You are a waste of brain cells ...
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
The Internet’s growth during the past few years has profoundly affected
the way software is licensed and distributed. One of the most important
changes that has occurred during this period is the emergence of
so-called open source licensing ...
http://www.abanet.org/intelprop/opensource.html
Doug Mentohl wrote:
During a presentation at the Southern California Linux Expo,
Software Freedom Law Center technical director Bradley Kuhn
explained how the free software community can overcome the
challenges posed by cloud computing ..
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU_Copyright_Directive
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001L0029:EN:HTML
(27) The mere provision of physical facilities for enabling
or making a communication does not in itself amount to
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
It won't convince many people but do your best
I never expect to convince the GPL opponents, but I will do my
best to counter their incorrect statements when they make them,
for the benefit of the few other readers who have not yet
killfiled us.
They haven't
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU_Copyright_Directive
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001L0029:EN:HTML
(27) The mere provision of physical facilities for enabling
or making a communication does not in
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU_Copyright_Directive
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001L0029:EN:HTML
(27) The mere provision of physical facilities for enabling
or making a communication does not in itself
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com wrote in message
news:axvpl.58231$6r1.31...@newsfe19.iad...
amicus_curious wrote:
Well, the link resolves to downloads.verizon.net and that is most
certainly a Verizon site.
You cannot know from the outside what the Verizon webserver
is doing when it processes
Rjack wrote:
Yeh. . . especially since it ain't got no friggin' choice.
Why do you believe they had no choice?
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Rjack u...@example.net writes:
A dismissal with prejudice just means you can't refile for a
violation that has already occurred. You can always refile for
violations occuring after that.
Rjack, how come you don't cite cases when amicus_curious gets the
law wrong?
OK Rahul. Here's your
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack u...@example.net writes:
A dismissal with prejudice just means you can't refile for a
violation that has already occurred. You can always refile for
violations occuring after that.
Rjack, how come you don't cite cases when amicus_curious gets the
law wrong?
OK
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
To clarify, suppose somebody hits you, and you sue him, and he
succeeds in persuading you to dismiss with prejudice. Does this
now give that person a lifetime license to hit you any time he
wishes? Citations would be great!
To clarify, suppose somebody lies about you
Rjack u...@example.net writes:
No one can rely on life being fair. A monopolist like Microsoft
with $19 billion in cash on hand will end up calling the shots in a
patent war.
Fine. A shot in my leg. It is not like I don't have seven others.
--
David Kastrup
Rjack wrote:
The BusyBox suits are over. Get over spinning the
hypothetical settlements.
After each case was settled, the defendants or their agents
made the source code properly available under the GPL.
Move on to creating explanations to justify the SFLC's evasion of an
interpretation of
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
Rjack wrote:
The BusyBox suits are over. Get over spinning the
hypothetical settlements.
After each case was settled, the defendants or their agents
made the source code properly available under the GPL.
Move on to creating explanations to justify the
David Kastrup wrote:
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
Rjack wrote:
The BusyBox suits are over. Get over spinning the
hypothetical settlements.
After each case was settled, the defendants or their agents
made the source code properly available under the GPL.
Move on to creating
Rjack wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
Rjack wrote:
The BusyBox suits are over. Get over spinning the
hypothetical settlements.
After each case was settled, the defendants or their agents
made the source code properly available under the GPL.
Move on to
Peter Köhlmann wrote:
Rjack wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
Rjack wrote:
The BusyBox suits are over. Get over spinning the
hypothetical settlements.
After each case was settled, the defendants or their agents
made the source code properly available under
Rjack u...@example.net wrote in message
news:xo-dnwfrqlit8jxunz2dnuvz_t3in...@giganews.com...
Peter Köhlmann wrote:
Rjack wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes:
Rjack wrote:
The BusyBox suits are over. Get over spinning the hypothetical
settlements.
After each
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:00:07 +, Andrew Halliwell wrote:
Doctor Smith iaintgotnostinkinem...@ols.net wrote:
They will be utterly crushed into the ground.
Who? Tomtom?
In europe? (I presume as they're a european company, that's where the
trial will be held...?)
If not, tomtom could
34 matches
Mail list logo
