Wolfgang Draxinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sherman Pendley wrote:
Lorenzo Villari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm maybe wrong, but I was under the impression that for
Firefox they use gtk+, which is written in C...
Gtk+ is indeed written in C, but it's object-oriented
And?!
Coding
JohnF wrote:
[...]
You've probably read this, but just in case:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
Hope that helps.
Thanks, Ciaran, for the discussion and very useful information.
Now read
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
regards,
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now read
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
I just skimmed it.
I didn't find what the author is trying to prove, but I know that most of
your mails about the GPL are claims that it isn't enforceable or doesn't
work
Stop shifting the burden of proof, GNUtian ciaran.
Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now read
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
I just skimmed it.
I didn't find what the author is trying to prove, but I know that
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
SFLC complaints are to be dismissed automatically (due to lack of
jurisdiction).
SFLC does dismiss complaints automatically before defendants file any
response to the complaint and any ruling from judge (actually before
having him a chance to even read the GPL and
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
It's up to the FSF/SFLC to proof their belief. Thus far, all that
we've seen is just a bunch of moronic complaints warranting automatic
dismissal AND which were dismissed automatically by the SFLC.
The plaintiffs have to prove their beliefs only to the extent that
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
SFLC complaints are to be dismissed automatically (due to lack of
jurisdiction).
SFLC does dismiss complaints automatically before defendants file any
response to the complaint and any ruling from judge (actually before
having him a
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
It's up to the FSF/SFLC to proof their belief. Thus far, all that
we've seen is just a bunch of moronic complaints warranting automatic
dismissal AND which were dismissed automatically by the SFLC.
The plaintiffs have to prove their
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
How come that Verizon still doesn't make GPLed software available as
required Hyman?
I guess that the plaintiffs decided that having the manufacturer
of the routers comply with the GPL was good enough for them, because
it would be difficult to explain in court that
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
It's up to the FSF/SFLC to proof their belief.
Hyman Rosen wrote:
The plaintiffs have to prove their beliefs only to the extent that
the defendants challenge them.
According to Hyman if I sue him and shortly dismiss the
complaint prior ... then I'm surely has
Hyman Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SFLC does dismiss complaints automatically before defendants file any
response to the complaint and any ruling from judge (actually before
having him a chance to even read the GPL and complaint).
And afterwards, the GPLed software is found to be available
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
Even in the Verizon case, on the page to which you always point,
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp, the actual
URL for the firmware download is
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Somebody wants to hide something. Who -- the defendants or the SFLC?
It's hard to tell.
Why do you think anyone is hiding anything? For example,
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/mar/17/busybox-verizon/
says
As a result of the plaintiffs agreeing to dismiss the
blockquote
what=official NYLUG announcement
note=The NYLUG Python Workshop meets every second Tuesday.
From: NYLUG Announcements [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NYLUG Announcements [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:20:01 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [nylug-announce] NYLUG Python Workshop,
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Somebody wants to hide something. Who -- the defendants or the SFLC? It's
hard to tell.
Why do you think anyone is hiding anything? For example,
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/mar/17/busybox-verizon/ says As a
result of the plaintiffs
rjack wrote:
Although no independently verifiable evidence of record, plaintiffs
face-saving blog posts prove their claims after case is voluntarily
dismissed with prejudice!
It is independently verifiable through the WaybackMachine and
other websites that Verizon was distributing the
Hyman Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Somebody wants to hide something. Who -- the defendants or the SFLC?
It's hard to tell.
Why do you think anyone is hiding anything? For example,
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/mar/17/busybox-verizon/
says
[press release
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
I'm inclined to think that at least one of the parties would be harmed
or embarrassed if the settlement became public -- otherwise they would
have just posted it, on or near the same web page where the complaint
was posted.
Willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words: There cannot be any commercial applicaiton written in C,
because in your view it is not well suited to one or two application
types you can think of.
I don't think that's what James meant. I think when he said commercial
application, he really
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
) I don't think that's what James meant. I think when he said commercial
) application, he really meant business data processing application. C
) really *isn't* well suited to most BDP applications, so his statement is
) much more reasonable when interpreted that way.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Willem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words: There cannot be any commercial applicaiton written in C,
because in your view it is not well suited to one or two application
types you can think of.
I don't think that's what James meant. I think when he said
David Kastrup wrote:
Well, message passing, the fundamental defining characteristic
of OOP (I mean, this is what made Smalltalk revolutionary with
regard to programming techniques and gave it its name) requires
you to switch sustained execution contexts, basically switching
to a different
22 matches
Mail list logo
