Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
RJack wrote: Best Buy Inc. has just filed a 28 page (available on PACER) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Let the the fireworks begin! SFLC's exciting reply: http://www.terekhov.de/188.pdf 1. They don't object Best Buy claim that SFC 'agent' has no standing at all. Ciao SFC plaintiff. Ha ha. 2. Regarding the bogus copyright registration and lack of identification of Andersen's actual work, the answer is basically it's all in the CVS and Subversion logs so go dig it out yourself dear copyright office and defendants. Ha ha. 3. The rights under the GPL really really automatically terminate on a slightest breach with no way to cure and the only way out is to beg for reinstantiation of rights. Ha ha. 4. The plaintiffs are really really irreparably harmed. LOL. 5. Dear judge, free us poor plaintiffs from the obligation to post the security bond... LMAO. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
On 3/22/2011 6:51 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: RJack wrote: Best Buy Inc. has just filed a 28 page (available on PACER) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Let the the fireworks begin! SFLC's exciting reply: http://www.terekhov.de/188.pdf 1. They don't object Best Buy claim that SFC 'agent' has no standing at all. Ciao SFC plaintiff. Ha ha. 2. Regarding the bogus copyright registration and lack of identification of Andersen's actual work, the answer is basically it's all in the CVS and Subversion logs so go dig it out yourself dear copyright office and defendants. Ha ha. 3. The rights under the GPL really really automatically terminate on a slightest breach with no way to cure and the only way out is to beg for reinstantiation of rights. Ha ha. 4. The plaintiffs are really really irreparably harmed. LOL. 5. Dear judge, free us poor plaintiffs from the obligation to post the security bond... LMAO. The SFLC is utterly clueless concerning the registration of derivative works. SFLC says: The first version of BusyBox Andersen released after leaving Lineo was version 0.60.3. That version contained 8,897 lines of brand new code added by Andersen after leaving Lineo. This new code added functionality and improvements to the stability of BusyBox's core features. Williamson Decl. Ex. A at 274:5– 276:24. A large portion of this code, 5,794 lines, he wrote entirely by himself. So... we are now down to 5,794 lines of code of unregistered, unidentified lines of code -- not BusyBox 0.60.3. Remember the SFLC Complaint? BusyBox is a single computer program that comprises a set of computing tools and optimizes them for computers with limited resources, such as cell phones, PDAs, and other small, specialized electronic devices. Andersen was registering ...a single computer program..., *except* it is now ...5,794 lines... of code. Best Buy anticipated this ploy: [n.11] If Mr. Andersen were to later claim that he is trying to enforce only his personal contributions to v.0.60.3, those contributions have not been defined, they are not before the Court, and they are not alleged to be in the accused devices. Sincerely, RJack :) ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud
RJack wrote: On 3/22/2011 6:51 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: RJack wrote: Best Buy Inc. has just filed a 28 page (available on PACER) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Let the the fireworks begin! SFLC's exciting reply: http://www.terekhov.de/188.pdf 1. They don't object Best Buy claim that SFC 'agent' has no standing at all. Ciao SFC plaintiff. Ha ha. 2. Regarding the bogus copyright registration and lack of identification of Andersen's actual work, the answer is basically it's all in the CVS and Subversion logs so go dig it out yourself dear copyright office and defendants. Ha ha. 3. The rights under the GPL really really automatically terminate on a slightest breach with no way to cure and the only way out is to beg for reinstantiation of rights. Ha ha. 4. The plaintiffs are really really irreparably harmed. LOL. 5. Dear judge, free us poor plaintiffs from the obligation to post the security bond... LMAO. The SFLC is utterly clueless concerning the registration of derivative works. SFLC says: The first version of BusyBox Andersen released after leaving Lineo was version 0.60.3. That version contained 8,897 lines of brand new code added by Andersen after leaving Lineo. This new code added functionality and improvements to the stability of BusyBox's core features. Williamson Decl. Ex. A at 274:5 276:24. A large portion of this code, 5,794 lines, he wrote entirely by himself. So... we are now down to 5,794 lines of code of unregistered, Actually we are now down to 3,078 lines, see below. unidentified lines of code -- not BusyBox 0.60.3. Remember Note that the line count includes both '.h'-headers and '.c'-files. Headers contain zilch of copyrightable expression. Note also that Best Buy distributed version 1.2.1 and not 0.60.3. From Kuhn's declaration: I inspected the commit logs stored at http://www.busybox.net to determine Erik Andersen's recorded contributions to BusyBox version 0.60.3 that were still present in BusyBox version 1.2.1. I found that of the 8,868 lines of code Andersen added or was the last to edit in BusyBox version 0.60.3, 4,884 remain unchanged in BusyBox version 1.2.1. I also found that of the 5,794 lines of code that Andersen added or was the last to edit in BusyBox version 0.60.3, excluding situations where Andersen noted in the log that he was contributing a patch written in part or in whole by another developer, 3,078 lines of code remain unchanged in BusyBox version 1.2.1. In particular, I ran a computer program that processed the author data associated with each line of code contained in BusyBox version 1.2.1 files ending in .c or .h applying similar criteria as described in ¶ 6 and ¶ 7 of this declaration, and finding those lines where the author and timestamp data had not changed between version 0.60.3 and version 1.2.1. the SFLC Complaint? BusyBox is a single computer program that comprises a set of computing tools and optimizes them for computers with limited resources, such as cell phones, PDAs, and other small, specialized electronic devices. Andersen was registering ...a single computer program..., *except* it is now ...5,794 lines... of code. Best Buy anticipated this ploy: [n.11] If Mr. Andersen were to later claim that he is trying to enforce only his personal contributions to v.0.60.3, those contributions have not been defined, they are not before the Court, and they are not alleged to be in the accused devices. Sincerely, RJack :) regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Question - Best forums to start an free project
Hello, I would like to know if you know of some forums or mailing lists where I can submit a message to START a free application project. I'm interested in developing a new integrated development environment and have some ideas on what to focus and what features to develop. However, I would like to exchange these ideas and try to start programming a new IDE and publish it somewhere but I'm kind of very lost. Thanks for your help beforehand, /Hiram ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Question - Best forums to start an free project
On 3/22/2011 8:43 AM, Hiram wrote: Hello, I would like to know if you know of some forums or mailing lists where I can submit a message to START a free application project. I'm interested in developing a new integrated development environment and have some ideas on what to focus and what features to develop. However, I would like to exchange these ideas and try to start programming a new IDE and publish it somewhere but I'm kind of very lost. Thanks for your help beforehand, /Hiram Discussions in this group are centered around a legally unenforceable but vexatious license known as the GPL. The license vainly attempts to convince folks that it can take control of others exclusive rights in their source code. The GPL is not a free license but one that attempts to be highly restrictive. Avoid it at all costs. You should google for various BSD groups that release their projects under the BSD style open source license. The Apache license is also a good license to use for open source, truly free applications. Sincerely, RJack :) ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Re: Question - Best forums to start an free project
RJack u...@example.net writes: On 3/22/2011 8:43 AM, Hiram wrote: Hello, I would like to know if you know of some forums or mailing lists where I can submit a message to START a free application project. I'm interested in developing a new integrated development environment and have some ideas on what to focus and what features to develop. However, I would like to exchange these ideas and try to start programming a new IDE and publish it somewhere but I'm kind of very lost. Discussions in this group are centered around a legally unenforceable but vexatious license known as the GPL. As you can see, this group has its resident trolls. I think it strongly depends on where the focus of your IDE is supposed to be, what language it is supposed to be written in, what language supposed to support etc etc. In the GNU world, Emacs is mostly used as an IDE. Of course, it has quite a number of quirks, having evolved for 30 years. So the question is whether you can raise lots of interest for your project. Eclipse is also rather well-known. GNOME/KDE might have their own preferred things. And so on. Basically the question is who would be interested in your software for what purpose. And in general: if you have not even gotten to the point proof of concept code, it will be very hard to interest anybody in joining your project rather than starting his own. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
