Re: what is GNU? what is a social contract?

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:18 AM Carlo Wood wrote: > They are hostile towards the GNU project. Yes, we are opposed to the current governance structure of the GNU Project. > Therefore, there is nothing to discuss really. The correct > thing to do right now is to ignore their attempts to sow

Re: Cause for bans

Dear Ruben Safir, If you're going to take legal action, take it. Don't just "threaten" forever. Your "threats" and unhappiness have no meaning if you do not take the next step (note: legal "threats" are not threats) 200 dollar filing fee, have one of your friends help you pro-bono. If you have

Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 04:12:04PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > "Andreas R." writes: > > The wiki has been described as a tool for *all* GNU maintainers, even > > though it's only available to a certain subset of GNU maintainers > > willing to agree to new stipulations that were never part of being

Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract

> I, Frederic Y. Bois, maintainer of package GNU MCSim, endorse version > 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract, available at > . People are welcome to endorse the social contract (or any other document, like the Bible or the Koran) if they wish However, how

gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement

I am the founder and co-maintainer of the GNU Scientific Library, and of Dominion, and I am GNU contributor since 1985. I endorse version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract, available at . Mark Galassi

Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract

Hi Frederic, Mark Wielaard skribis: > On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 12:31 +0100, fredoma...@free.fr wrote: >> As far as I can see, there has not been modification to the proposed >> GNU Social Contract, and I happy to re-iterate my support to it. > > There were several pieces of feedback that were

Re: Moderation

Hi Mike & Brandon, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > A large part of the traffic over the last few weeks was repeated > ad-hominem attacks, always by the same people. > > This is a violation of the list’s stated policy at > . It gives a > poor

Re: State of the GNUnion 2020

Hi Andy, On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 20:14 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote: > Recently I put dozens of hours into > analyzing past GNU releases. The result is here: > > https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/02/09/state-of-the-gnunion-2020 Thanks for that and for publishing the raw data too. The data itself