(Note: Sending here now as this the other list was for tech discussions
instead, oh an they lied: the pre-moderation is still on (for me,
because they do not want this topic discussed (and have admitted so))).
(SFConservancy hasn't done anything in years, FSF Legal is the same)
.
RMS:.
Could yo
You do know, correct?, that the Copyright holder can simply rescind the
license if he is displeased with the way the licensee is behaving -
since the license is not supported by a contract.
The licensee would then rush to the Federal Court in his district to
seek a declaratory judgement regard
You are incorrect. GPL version 2 section 6 states that one shall not add
additional restrictions between the agreement between the licensee and
further licensees. It governs that relationship vis-a-vis the protected
Work.
GrSecurity has, indeed, stipulated an additional restrictive term.
From:
Bruce Perens and the EFF have addressed this, it is indeed a violation
to add an additional restrictive term such as that: they are threatening
a penalty, using a negative covenant, if the customer utilizes the
permissions granted to him (and GrSecurity) by the Copyright holder of
the original
Getting GNU/Linux onto a laptop these days is quite the difficulty if
you don't know what you're doing because of Secure Boot. It's not a plug
and play thing like once it was. Probably discourages alot of users.
Linux doesn't have any security after GrSecurity went proprietary
(something that
2019-11-04 21:14, Florian Weimer wrote:
* nipponmail:
You are incorrect. GPL version 2 section 6 states that one shall not
add
additional restrictions between the agreement between the licensee and
further licensees. It governs that relationship vis-a-vis the
protected
Work.
GrSecurity h
I was describing the steps one needs to go through to get a Gnu/Linux
system installed on a laptop. I did it a month or two ago. It's not as
easy as it was in the past because of secure boot. You must use the
pre-installed OS to disable the secure boot: you _cannot_ do it from the
bios.
On 20
Dear Ruben Safir,
If you're going to take legal action, take it. Don't just "threaten"
forever. Your "threats" and unhappiness have no meaning if you do not
take the next step (note: legal "threats" are not threats)
200 dollar filing fee, have one of your friends help you pro-bono. If
you have
The GPL is the social contract upon which this whole movement is based.
It works because it doesn't interfere with everyone's various religions.
These other "social contracts" are extraneous impositions, by people who
worship whatever America's current religion is.
On 2020-02-14 04:51, Ruben
Translations are derivative works of the original.
On 2020-02-14 18:45, Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
Le lundi 3 février 2020, 16:28:52 CET Benno Schulenberg a écrit :
But in practice the GNU project requires
that significant contributors sign a copyright assignment, and that
translators si
Why don't you like being subscribed to his list?
I'm subscribed too, automatically, but I'm GLAD for it.
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
What, this list isn't GOOD enough?
On 2020-02-17 04:40, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
Ruben Safir wrote:
Nobody but Stallman can do what he does, as a spokeman,
It suddenly stopped for me too, I didn't do anything tho.
On 2020-02-19 06:33, Marcel wrote:
Thank you Orbulon. I have blocked all of the related domains. I have
been very busy while traveling and this incessant spam has been a real
nuisance.
That I have been forced to block the domain names to
They got rid of RMS because "the industry" (working white men) don't
want to see a repeat of the Cisco suit, where RMS was victorious, and
won big.
The rest of the current FSF are do-nothings and won't sue anyone for
copyright infringement of the GPL.
On 2020-02-21 16:27, Ruben Safir wrote:
FSF seems defunct. When was the last time we had a glorious Peoples
Action, such as the Cisco lawsuit? Forever ago. It's not doing what it's
supposed to do: which is protect the copyrights it holds (whole reason
it induces their hand over to begin with)
On 2020-02-22 12:51, Alexandre François
I would like to be unsubscribed from the "NYLXS" list, and the
gnu-misc-discuss list if it's being sent there too.
I'm on the list to see what RMS has to say, once in awhile.
I'm not on this list to see a do-nothing guy foment all day and night
filling up my inbox. Ruben: If you want to sue, s
The existing tools and infrastructure for dealing with that
problem is also appropriate here.
Are you saying that you are going to submit him for criminal prosecution
under the Can-Spam act?!?!?!? He doesn't make money off of the spam, and
it isn't from a spoofed address so...
On 2020-02-25
The existing tools and infrastructure for dealing with that
problem is also appropriate here.
Are you saying that you are going to submit him for criminal prosecution
under the Can-Spam act?!?!?!? He doesn't make money off of the spam, and
it isn't from a spoofed address so...
On 2020-02-25
17 matches
Mail list logo
