Hi Frederico,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 01:48:28AM +0200, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> I'd like to stress a passage which made me think quite a bit:
>
> > We have never
> > pressed contributors to endorse the GNU Project philosophy, or any
> > other philosophical views, because people are welcome
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 17:24, Carlo Wood said:
> So, I think all of this can be summarized as a small group of
> two maybe three people who started a new website and are trying
There are more than three people who disagree with the way the GNU
project is currently managed.
Except for signing the
* Mark Wielaard [2020-02-08 10:24]:
> A GNU wiki to support this process was requested by several GNU
> maintainers. So we did ask the FSF to setup a public space for this.
> To have a neutral place for the GNU community as a whole to have a
> public discussion. But they told us that they don't
- Ludovic Court??s
- Andreas Enge
- Carlos O???Donell
- Mark Wielaard
- Andy Wingo
<>
This is inapropriate use of GNU resources and it is intended to create
an air of authority that they do not have.
BAN THEM
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 04:08:36PM -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> You make the assumption that the views of the maintainers are the
> views of the GNU project -- this has never been the case. GNU
> maintainers do not define what the GNU project is.
Because we are all code monkeys, aka programming slaves. As long as we
do what we're told we
Mark Wielaard isn't a moderator for the gnu-misc-discuss list.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 11:57:45AM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
> > You make the assumption that the views of the maintainers are the
> > views of the GNU project -- this has never been the case. GNU
> > maintainers do not define what the GNU project is.
>
>
a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
> You make the assumption that the views of the maintainers are the
> views of the GNU project -- this has never been the case. GNU
> maintainers do not define what the GNU project is.
Because we are all code monkeys, aka programming slaves. As long as we
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:51:49 +0100
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Many people already gave feedback on it and we do hope that it does
> match as closely as possible. If you still believe it doesn't entirely
> accord with the GNU Project's views then please do suggest wording
> changes. We hope to combine
On 2/7/20 2:51 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> As you know since the FSF asked for feedback on the relationship
> between the FSF and GNU
As you know is the biggest indicator of lies and deceit to follow than
any other phrase in English or any other language. It is followed by,
"As we can all
You make the assumption that the views of the maintainers are the
views of the GNU project -- this has never been the case. GNU
maintainers do not define what the GNU project is.
Seeing that you are not representative of the GNU project, you are not
in a position to say what is or is not
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:36:07AM -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:26:51 -0500
> From: "Richard Stallman (Chief GNUisance)"
> To: r...@gnu.org
> Subject: What's GNU -- and what's not
>
> The GNU Project is sending this message to each GNU package
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
