ng to do with dropbox.com?
If so, then my concern was a false alarm.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
sed
> under GPL-2, but now that I've rechecked the code it does not visibly carry
> any license. It would probably be a good idea to ask doxygen to include
some
> GPL header in every included JavaScript file.
Yes, we should do that. Can you find a contact there I can ask?
--
Dr Rich
you please tell me the URLs of the pages in question?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
e ethical issue in this area is that all Javascript code sent to the
user must be free.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
ect
> website documentation, and just trying to establish a connection to
> ftp.gnu.org will fail with "Error: Bad IP connecting".
I asked the sysadmins to check this.
Thanks.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (intern
st as CloudFlare has no right to change the copies of free
software that we run on our servers.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.html
may help clarify this.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
mirror.
Last I heard we had lots of mirrors. Making another kind of mirror
would be useful too.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
t; available where? At GNU.
I agree that such uniformity would be better -- but many GNU packages
distribute in other ways, and have done so for a long time.
Convincing them to make this more uniform will not be easy.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.
eone would write manuals for them. Perhaps someone here will
do so?
Is there a specific concrete problem with the distribution
of GNU Radio manuals?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
s a simple task which requires non-free
> javascript.
I had to answer a captcha, but it was a kind of captcha that does not
use nonfree JS code. I had no trouble answering it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethallo
with LibreJS active.
The fact that some other browsers have trouble is unfortunate. But
since our recommended free browser works ok, my conclusion is that
this doesn't rise to the level of an ethical problem.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall
wise, can you please show the specific
text in the license that you think is being violated?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
recall that we are not using the term GSD to refer to the
Guix-based distro. Please stop posting messages which presuppose
we are using that term.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree
(or avant-garde) system distribution.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
the guix package manager and guixSD on a single website, with a single
logo, and a single space for documentation (in 1 or 2 files, does not matter).
On a single web page, maybe ok, but they should have two different logos
since they are different things.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free
as respectful of other GNU systems.
It should say GNU's advanced system distribution.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
,
let's use GuixSD.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
lead to various kinds of confusion.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
system distribution, and this is it.
I am not going to make a premature commitment such as that.
Therefore, any name which suggests that is a no-no.
GSD as an abbreviation for GNU system distribution has the same
problem, plus the unfortunate resemblance to BSD.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President
the terms of the CC-BY-NC 3.0.
How sad that it still has a nonfree license.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
is sort of ok.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
the task of gathering the brunt of these suggestions @
http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/Suggested_Distro_Names
I will semd mail to fetch that page.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's
.
Not as clever and funny as Guixotic, but if the Guix developers
prefer it, I will go along.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone
it, perhaps not as clever and funny
as Guixotic but they'd be acceptable.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
be
interpreted as a deprecation of them. So I should not accept
that name.
In other words, if the case is not clear, we should use some other
name.
Please look for a name that would not place this distro over the other
free distros. I must not make their developers feel bad.
--
Dr Richard
problems:
* It doesn't say that this is a distribution of the GNU _system_.
* It implies this is the one and only software distribution
that is connected with GNU.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way
Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
/Group:Guix/Suggested_Distro_Names in the
event GNU could not be used.
I like Guixotic. After all, so many people have called the GNU Project
Quixotic.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's
think I will stick with a device with no modem chip.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
the A is the intended clue that it
is not *the* distribution.
I would like to say that the Guix GNU/Linux is _the one and only_ XYZ
for some XYZ. I'm looking for a suitable XYZ that is disjoint from
the other existing free distros.
Perhaps experimental or advanced.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
not directly implement POSIX interfaces. The C library
does substantial work in order to provide POSIX semantics on top
of Hurd interfaces.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom
signature.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
don't know whose site that is. Not mine.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
use of: crowdsupply.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
.
What URL needs to be corrected?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
ago, the Hurd lacked many of the useful features found in
Linux. These had nothing to do with the essential differences between
Hurd and Linux, but they meant that the Hurd needed a lot of work to
be a competitor.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA
code of Linux. Our main goal is to free people
from proprietary software. When we started the Hurd, in 1990,
Linux had not even been thought of, and we had no prospect of getting
any free kernel except to write one ourselves.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin
for GNU in recent years, and
I'm looking for ways to delegate more to specific people I will
choose.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga
the GNU developers back from releasing the first version of
the GNU Operating System.
I know that's ironic and sad, but it's, guess what: RMS.
Development of Guix is going on. The question is what we should call
things. That's what I must think carefully about.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
to say The GNU project's distribution of the
GNU operating system.
Hold your horses. This may be very undesirable -- I explained the
issues in another message.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way
Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
by the size of each library. That would use
efficiently whatever amount of space is allocated for the cache.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga
Is Stow still useful, or should we think of Guix as a replacement for it?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
the best of both worlds. You will be able to update
shared libraries without reinstalling applications, and most of the
time everything will use the updated library, but you can make an
application use an older library version when you prefer.
What do you think?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President
sources to get the .h files.
Referring to Torvalds' nonfree code is sending the wrong message.
Please ack when this is fixed.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying
Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
[2] https://gitorious.org/guix/guix/blobs/master/distro/packages/base.scm
Any particular reason it uses kernel.org Linux instead of Linux libre?
Is that true? It must not use vanilla Linux, because that
includes nonfree software.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software
.
That is a strange message, since it appears to describe an
internal condition rather than an error in the input.
How about discussing with the GCC developers what's up?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way
this, that is good. I thought
we were still in the stage of arguing about what sort of thing to do.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary
Would you like to work with a few others to design a format
that extends Texinfo SXML and would be adequate for the job of fast
display of manuals in Emacs?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's
Emacs render the XML or SXML output
that we would get from our manuals? Is that feasible?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone
format. And the code in makeinfo that
we use to convert Texinfo won't be the code Emacs uses for this.
Notwithstanding that, use of Texinfo XML is a good option to consider
too.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Would you like to help design a specific format, based on HTML,
that we could use to implement the Info features that browsers
don't have?
What about just Texinfo, or Texinfo-as-sexps?
If it works, why not? Stefan, would this work?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free
What does a new GNU operating system mean?
GNU IS an operating system.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
Ludovic aka l...@gnu.org starded a project implementing nix package
definitions in scheme/guile: https://gitorious.org/guix
That's cool.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree
it),
means that GNU already effectively has a system like Portage without
having to write anything more than maybe a bit of glue code or a GUI.
That is good news. (So we don't need to think about Daniel Robbins.)
Is anyone interested in working on the interface to do this?
--
Dr Richard
it noticeably slower to run a
command?
I wonder why they don't populate /usr/bin and ~/bin with the
installed commands. Is it just to make it functional,
or is there a practical reason?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org
, it would have to become the main free distro. If
it simply becomes one among several free distros, then it would not
gain much for GNU in PR terms, and would divide efforts, and that
would be counterproductive in several ways.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin
can't be available but it seems wrong for the
GNU Operating System to not be using its own components by
default.
You're quite right.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom
?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
With Nix, how does the shell search for an executable?
It searches PATH for the right executable.
What dirs does it find them in? Is it true that /bin does
not exist as we are used to? If it's true, how is it different
and why?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software
specifically for hackers can be a useful activity,
especially if it enables making free software do that better. But
the goal of our 28 years of work is broader than that.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way
of this discussion.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
convenient one.
I don't know whether dselect and Ubuntu's package mgr
depend on some features of .deb packages.
Meanwhile, I just read about Nix and it sounds really great.
Does it have a downside that isn't obvious?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston
, this reasoning
would be valid. But it makes no sense to do so much work
and fail to include the feature of binary packages.
This limitation would be gratuitous, since we already have fine free
software for binary packages.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston
At this time we have also an
. AUR (arch user repository)
. PUR (parabola user repository)
What does it mean to say that Parabola has an arch user repository?
I can see too many possible meanings.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA
mean, here, if it doesn't mean
You compile everything yourself?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category
the question of what it
would consist of, and how to develop and maintain it. Either we would
endorse some existing free distro that uses Linux-libre, or make
another. Both options have problems, previously discussed.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA
But since you cannot escape a sub-hurd currently, it has limit use;
one cannot run for example a web server inside a sub-hurd for security
reasons, since you cannot send things outside of the sub-hurd (no
access to the network).
Now we are getting at the real issues. For most
Since one can access all processes that are running in a sub-hurd from
the main system (say, using gdb), one could have a special program,
that listens to the messages that process sends.
Now say that you wish to allow network communication to be allowed
from the sub-hurd,
What exactly this should do, to get the job done and be secure, is
the question that we can answer by trying to really implement this.
It is already implemented, and has been implemented for the past 10
years.
Is there an application that really uses a sub-hurd?
One would have to allow access to /servers/socket/2 from the
underlying system to be able to get networking, and probobly other
files as well depending on what one wishes to use the sub-hurd for;
like block devices, normal files, etc.
We would need to modify sub-hurds so that
If the Hurd provides more power and/or better security, that won't
directly change the user experience. However, programmers and
sysadmins will take advantage of them, and the result will be
better user experience too.
This is true, but why put so much effort into
It would be useful to make a precise proposal to eliminate chroot as a
mechanism and use sub-hurds to do the same job. Then people could look
for flaws in it and we could see if it really works.
I'm not sure what such a proposal would look like, or how one would
find
Sorry about the delay, I did not see your answer. Off course that
will be translated material and absolutely not new material in
French.
If you want to do that, please do. However, updating the English
material is more useful.
I think people are concentrating on the outdated chroot model far to
much. The Hurd already has a immensly secure way to create a secure
box from which one cannot escape, it is called a sub-hurd.
It would be useful to make a precise proposal to eliminate chroot as a
mechanism and use
Well, as I pointed out above, the interesting case are translators
created from within the chroot. How would you handle that?
I was thinking about a different problem. I thought you were, too.
Linux is moving more and more towards a very
hybrid kernel, that is looking more and more like a microkernel. It
already does several things that we already do, user level file
systems and drivers for example. It already does several things that
we would like in GNU/Hurd as
Problems 2 through 7 are solved in my proposed road map by releasing an
initial version of the GNU OS that uses a 100% Linux kernel.
Phase 1: Linux kernel + Linux drivers
Name aside, how would this differ from an existing free GNU/Linux
system such as gNewSense?
I think Olaf
I had the impression from what I've read on this list, that one of the
long term goals is to make Hurd work without the need to borrow parts of
Linux.
We would surely like to do that, but it doesn't make sense to fully
rewrite the ext2 and ext3 file systems. It would be a lot of work
One issue Marcus pointed out at some point is the infamous firmlink
problem, i.e. that a translator set by a different user can lead to
undesired behaviour. (If the user has a symlink to '/' in /tmp or his
home directory for example, an rm -r on it launched by root
* Simply don't allow setting passive translators inside a chroot at
all. After all, chroot is only for UNIX compatibility, and
translators are not a UNIX concept...
This doesn't do the job. Suppose someone creates the passive translator
or firmlink in the directory, and later
Okay, using Linux in any form as part of the GNU System is not an
option. Understood.
Just out of curiosity, can you explain why it doesn't make sense?
See http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html#linuxgnu.
(I have too much mail to spend time on this.)
I for one have very little idea of what the GNU system is intended to
look like, not with respect to kernel hacking or super-advanced features
or driver implementations, but simply from a basic user and/or sysadmin
perspective.
From a basic user perspective, it would look pretty
These patches and fixes have to be considered one by one. If they
have been put together in one branch, that means he has to
disentangle them in order to consider them.
They were already considered one by one, so that job is already done.
Since Thomas is acting as the
This depends on what issues you are refering to. The two
(semi-serious) problems that Marcus pointed out wrt to passive
translators and firmlinks can be solved. As was pointed out by
Bushenell, and someone else.
I would like to see these solutions.
Could someone please show them
The difference is that between Linux N and N+1, the changes are
minimal and very incremental. The Hurd and Hurd-NG will have no
similarities at all other than the name.
Marcus told me that most of the servers would be just slightly
changed.
Anyone who think that Hurd-NG will not have as flaws just like
the Hurd currently has should not write software.
Please don't presume to tell others whether they should write
software.
Nobody can design a flawless program, this is simply a fact.
You've
Once again, I totally agree with you and I repeat, till we
fix/focus on our organizational problems, nothing good can emerge
from current development (sorry to think/to say that, it is not
targeted at current active Hurd developers).
In a volunteer project, the only way to improve
GNU Mach is not fundamentally obsolete or bad, I really do not
understand where people get this idea from.
That's what is said about GNU Mach...
According to what Marcos told me, GNU Mach is fundamentally incapable
of properly doing the job we had in mind for it to do. This
Is there anyone here who has the skills to install the large file
system support, and wants to do it?
I will take care of this issue.
Thank you very much.
You can just merge ams-branch to HEAD, will save you alot of work. It
still contains a slew of patches and bug fixes that have not been
commited.
These patches and fixes have to be considered one by one.
If they have been put together in one branch, that means
he has to disentangle
What Marcos said is that some low-level parts of the Hurd need to be
redesigned for Hurd-NG, but lots of servers would just be ported.
I always hoped that the project's seniors, Thomas Bushnell and Roland
McGrath, would get more active again and make some decision about
existing interface-changing (category (c)) issues, but this hasn't really
happened yet.
It is good to have their input, when they give it. But
For getting invasive (read: interface changes and the like) changes into
the Hurd we'd need (a) people to come up with such changes (!) and (b)
have them attract Thomas Bushnell's or Roland McGrath's or Marcus
Brinkmann's attention (which often enough is not trivial).
But I
In my opinion, what the Hurd needs right now, and first of all, is
a maintainer which applies patches and, once that works, some sort of
advertising to attract new hackers.
I think you are right.
Actually, patches got submitted to the bugzilla, but never got a look at
(and I personnally didn't know that glibc developper don't have time to
look at them). I submitted them to libc-alpha, and Roland applied them
immediately.
Maybe this indicates an organization problem: that
Linux has no choice but to stick with GPLv2 as they removed the `or any
later version' clause, and therefore to change the license to GPLv3
would require the consent of all the copyright holders. But to be honest
the license doesn't matter that much, as long as it is free.
Our
The functionality we want in stowfs is the functionality of dpkg (dpkg
reports if any dependencies are not resolved to any program using it),
not apt-get.
I agree.
___
gnu-system-discuss mailing list
gnu-system-discuss@gnu.org
101 - 199 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
