You can also use: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/
The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
alive
anubis
archimedes
avl
ballandpaddle
bpel2owfn
ccide
cim
combine
dap
edma
fontutils
garpd
gift
gmediaserver
gnatsweb
gnows
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 20:41]:
> You can also use: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/
>
> The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and
> are at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
Let me make few links for easier review.
https://www.gnu.org/s/alive
https://w
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 20:41]:
> You can also use: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/
>
> The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and
> are at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
https://www.gnu.org/s/alive
Alive is usable program. What means "inactive"? If
The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
Neither of those are good metrics or reasons to decommision a package.
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2019-09-03 21:26]:
>The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
>at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
>
> Neither of those are good metrics or reasons to decommision a package.
I also agree on that, there is no reason.
Software nee
Quoting Jean Louis :
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2019-09-03 21:26]:
The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
Neither of those are good metrics or reasons to decommision a package.
I also agree on that, there is no reason.
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 22:09]:
> I dont know if this is the right way reply
> My idea is that the absent of those in a distribution (some of those are
> removed by Debian) might indicate stability issues or not usefull enough, so
> maybe there are better existing options.
> (At least
If package is not in Debian GNU/Linux, for me this indicates nothing
that relates to GNU packages, unless there is some specific discussion
related to such specific package, or if there is specific bug report.
Debian is also a GNU/Linux distribution that we do not recommend.
Quoting a...@gnu.org:
If package is not in Debian GNU/Linux, for me this indicates nothing
that relates to GNU packages, unless there is some specific discussion
related to such specific package, or if there is specific bug report.
Debian is also a GNU/Linux distribution that we do not reco
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2019-09-03 22:33]:
>If package is not in Debian GNU/Linux, for me this indicates nothing
>that relates to GNU packages, unless there is some specific discussion
>related to such specific package, or if there is specific bug report.
>
> Debian is also a GNU/Linux di
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 22:41]:
> Quoting a...@gnu.org:
>
> > If package is not in Debian GNU/Linux, for me this indicates nothing
> > that relates to GNU packages, unless there is some specific discussion
> > related to such specific package, or if there is specific bug report.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I asked the right people (maintain...@gnu.org) to check the situation.
--
Dr Richar
I'm the author and maintainer of GNU XmlAT, I've been considering
obsolete it for years. And I'd like to add other new meaningful project to
GNU.
Here's a brief reason.
XmlAT was used to convert XML to s-expr as an intermediate
presentation for multiple cases. And it can be output to other
format
On September 4, 2019 6:08:50 AM UTC, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>
>I'm the author and maintainer of GNU XmlAT, I've been considering
>obsolete it for years. And I'd like to add other new meaningful project
>to
>GNU.
>
>Here's a brief reason.
>XmlAT was used to convert XML to s-expr as an intermediate
>
On September 4, 2019 6:08:50 AM UTC, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>
>I'm the author and maintainer of GNU XmlAT, I've been considering
>obsolete it for years. And I'd like to add other new meaningful project
>to
>GNU.
>
>Here's a brief reason.
>XmlAT was used to convert XML to s-expr as an intermediate
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
