[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I asked the right people (maintain...@gnu.org) to check the situation.
--
Dr
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 22:41]:
> Quoting a...@gnu.org:
>
> > If package is not in Debian GNU/Linux, for me this indicates nothing
> > that relates to GNU packages, unless there is some specific discussion
> > related to such specific package, or if there is specific bug report.
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2019-09-03 22:33]:
>If package is not in Debian GNU/Linux, for me this indicates nothing
>that relates to GNU packages, unless there is some specific discussion
>related to such specific package, or if there is specific bug report.
>
> Debian is also a GNU/Linux
Quoting a...@gnu.org:
If package is not in Debian GNU/Linux, for me this indicates nothing
that relates to GNU packages, unless there is some specific discussion
related to such specific package, or if there is specific bug report.
Debian is also a GNU/Linux distribution that we do not
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 22:09]:
> I dont know if this is the right way reply
> My idea is that the absent of those in a distribution (some of those are
> removed by Debian) might indicate stability issues or not usefull enough, so
> maybe there are better existing options.
> (At
Quoting Jean Louis :
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2019-09-03 21:26]:
The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
Neither of those are good metrics or reasons to decommision a package.
I also agree on that, there is no
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2019-09-03 21:26]:
>The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
>at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
>
> Neither of those are good metrics or reasons to decommision a package.
I also agree on that, there is no reason.
Software
The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
Neither of those are good metrics or reasons to decommision a package.
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 20:41]:
> You can also use: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/
>
> The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and
> are at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
https://www.gnu.org/s/alive
Alive is usable program. What means "inactive"?
* bendik...@vfemail.net [2019-09-03 20:41]:
> You can also use: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/
>
> The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and
> are at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
Let me make few links for easier review.
https://www.gnu.org/s/alive
You can also use: https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/
The following GNU packages seem inactive for at least 5 years and are
at least (most probably) not part of Debian.
alive
anubis
archimedes
avl
ballandpaddle
bpel2owfn
ccide
cim
combine
dap
edma
fontutils
garpd
gift
gmediaserver
gnatsweb
11 matches
Mail list logo
