nds like it would still be a good idea to keep an
alternate implementation in the queue.
Huge kudos, as always, to the Gnucash team for keeping us Windows
free.
For you Yanks, happy Fourth!
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
_
parate file. I'd
strongly suggest, and it would be greatly appreciated by the user
community, that the hard work be done to make it so. You will end up
surprising a lot of folks (not in a good way) by auto-saving over the
original file.
Thanks for adding this feature, by the way. It is an
Thanks all.
I see that Thomas Bushnell has already uploaded a Debian package for
it in unstable.
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:32 -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> - Branch/tag Naming: it seems like a rename ["gnucash-1-6-branch" ->
> > >> &quo
;gnucash-1-6-branch" ->
>> "gnucash/branches/1.6"] is reasonable. Last-minute objections?
That is the normal method. I'd also expect to see gnucash/tags/1.8.12
and HEAD in gnucash/trunk.
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http:/
