On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:01:55PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
I'll just point out a couple of things:
1) This patch doesn't actually change any data formats, because there's
no data in those fields. So without additional changes (which I agree
should not get backported), there's no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Atkins schrieb:
1) This patch doesn't actually change any data formats, because there's
no data in those fields. So without additional changes (which I agree
should not get backported), there's no chance of a data format change.
Does
Quoting Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Atkins schrieb:
1) This patch doesn't actually change any data formats, because there's
no data in those fields. So without additional changes (which I agree
should not get backported),
Quoting Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
snip
2.0.[0123] will read a data file with this new
object and just ignore it (and drop it on the floor) without erroring out.
If that's true, then I withdraw my objection. Just to
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:51:37PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
Author: warlord
Date: 2006-12-11 21:51:37 -0500 (Mon, 11 Dec 2006)
New Revision: 15205
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15205
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/
gnucash/trunk/src/backend/file/gnc-commodity-xml-v2.c
Log:
I'll just point out a couple of things:
1) This patch doesn't actually change any data formats, because there's
no data in those fields. So without additional changes (which I agree
should not get backported), there's no chance of a data format change.
2) Your proposed change makes it
