Well, thank you for the source code. Out of curiosity I've spent some
more time on the larger batch of changes (step1 in my previous email),
as it turned out to be possible to separate the name changes from the
rest quite easily. @Everyone: Attached you'll find the patch that
changes GUID
--On December 12, 2006 11:19:24 AM +0100 Christian Stimming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* You replaced the type names GUID by GNC_GUID and CURRENCY by
GNC_CURRENCY, IGNORE by GNC_IGNORE and others. Any reasons for this,
especially the latter two? I vaguely recall GUID being defined in
some
Quoting Mike Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think I'll apply some of the name changes that concern only the .c
files. But especially the s/GUID/GNC_GUID/ change concerns a lot of
code, and, as I said, with SVN-trunk we don't observe any problems of
the potential name collision here. I'd
Christian Stimming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this information and the link to the download page (although
the download rate seems to be rather slow, 56 KB/sec?). I'm sorry to
hear about your effort only with this 4-weeks-moderation delay. Surely
the gnucash-devel list is the
Hi,
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* You added an extra data field to the Account data type, asset class,
along with appropriate reading/writing code in the xml backend and an
extra asset-class.scm scheme report. What do you intend to use this data
field for? Also, this additional data field
Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that not many people are using it yet, I would like to work out
a way to implement this functionality in the upstream if possible.
It need not be compatible with what I have. Would it be a reasonable
comprimise to add some kind of misc
Thanks. I think this will work for me. The only situation I can think of
where it is not correct at the commodity level is defining asset classes that
incorporate a tax hedge strategy (i.e. tax deferred Lg Cap vs. tax immediate Lg
Cap).
Tax policy balancing is rare but not unheard of in
Hi,
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks. I think this will work for me. The only situation I can
think of where it is not correct at the commodity level is defining
asset classes that incorporate a tax hedge strategy (i.e. tax
deferred Lg Cap vs. tax immediate Lg Cap).
You're welcome.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 06:54:55PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I think this will work for me. The only situation I can think of
where it is not correct at the commodity level is defining asset classes that
incorporate a tax hedge strategy (i.e. tax deferred Lg Cap vs. tax
