Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-13 Thread Derek Atkins
Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> writes: > Mike, > > Yes that was correct, I have had a rethink and made some changes which are > in bug 700125 to allow the update on the sub account view. It is dependent > on the account selected, if it is a place holder or a placeholder some > where below it i

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-11 Thread Mike Alexander
OK, I've played with this some more and have a few comments. See below. --On May 11, 2013 6:04:52 PM +0100 Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: Mike, Yes that was correct, I have had a rethink and made some changes which are in bug 700125 to allow the update on the sub account view. It

Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-11 Thread Robert Fewell
Mike, Yes that was correct, I have had a rethink and made some changes which are in bug 700125 to allow the update on the sub account view. It is dependent on the account selected, if it is a place holder or a placeholder some where below it it will be read only. Also, as I am requiring default ac

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-10 Thread David Carlson
On 5/10/2013 7:48 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Friday 10 May 2013 07:04:23 David Carlson wrote: >> On 5/10/2013 3:31 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: >>> Why do you want the new register to bevisibly different ? >>> >>> Geert >> Well, to start off, so that I can tell w

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-10 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 10 May 2013 07:04:23 David Carlson wrote: > On 5/10/2013 3:31 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > > Why do you want the new register to bevisibly different ? > > > > Geert > Well, to start off, so that I can tell while testing that I am actually looking at a

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-10 Thread David Carlson
On 5/10/2013 3:31 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > > On Monday 06 May 2013 08:32:02 David Carlson wrote: > > > On 5/5/2013 3:25 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: > > > > Alex, > > > > > > > > There is only one header row but the titles change depending on > which row > > > > you are on in the register. This is d

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-10 Thread Geert Janssens
On Monday 06 May 2013 08:32:02 David Carlson wrote: > On 5/5/2013 3:25 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: > > Alex, > > > > There is only one header row but the titles change depending on which row > > you are on in the register. This is deliberate to utilises the sort model. > > > > I did not think it was

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-09 Thread David Carlson
On 5/9/2013 2:25 PM, Mike Alexander wrote: > --On May 9, 2013 2:53:50 PM +0100 Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The opening of an account in the sub-account view should be read only >> and I have fixed this locally and will upload the patch along with >> some other changes at the we

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-09 Thread Mike Alexander
--On May 9, 2013 2:53:50 PM +0100 Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: The opening of an account in the sub-account view should be read only and I have fixed this locally and will upload the patch along with some other changes at the weekend. I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean that

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-09 Thread David Carlson
On 5/9/2013 12:12 PM, David Carlson wrote: > On 5/9/2013 8:53 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: >> David, >> >> Not sure about the schedule problem you have, I have tried it on my XP VM >> and I am unable to reproduce but will try different options. >> >> The opening of an account in the sub-account view sh

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-09 Thread David Carlson
On 5/9/2013 8:53 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: > David, > > Not sure about the schedule problem you have, I have tried it on my XP VM > and I am unable to reproduce but will try different options. > > The opening of an account in the sub-account view should be read only and I > have fixed this locally a

Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-09 Thread Robert Fewell
David, Not sure about the schedule problem you have, I have tried it on my XP VM and I am unable to reproduce but will try different options. The opening of an account in the sub-account view should be read only and I have fixed this locally and will upload the patch along with some other changes

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-08 Thread David Carlson
On 5/8/2013 1:37 PM, David Carlson wrote: > On 5/8/2013 10:07 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: >> David, >> >> Thank you for testing, I am a little confused by your last update. As I >> have pointed out on the bug mentioned, I am only interested in the new >> registers which all have the vertical status li

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-08 Thread David Carlson
On 5/8/2013 10:07 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: > David, > > Thank you for testing, I am a little confused by your last update. As I > have pointed out on the bug mentioned, I am only interested in the new > registers which all have the vertical status line and the columns can be > moved so you can move

Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-08 Thread Robert Fewell
David, Thank you for testing, I am a little confused by your last update. As I have pointed out on the bug mentioned, I am only interested in the new registers which all have the vertical status line and the columns can be moved so you can move it at your pleasure. Sub account registers do not al

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-08 Thread David Carlson
On 5/6/2013 8:32 AM, David Carlson wrote: > On 5/5/2013 3:25 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: >> Alex, >> >> There is only one header row but the titles change depending on which row >> you are on in the register. This is deliberate to utilises the sort model. >> >> I did not think it was necessary to have

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-06 Thread Derek Atkins
Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> writes: > At the moment it is just the Account registers that use the new interface, > I am looking at changing the business options to use the same thing. Thanks! > Robert -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Memb

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-06 Thread David Carlson
On 5/5/2013 3:25 AM, Robert Fewell wrote: > Alex, > > There is only one header row but the titles change depending on which row > you are on in the register. This is deliberate to utilises the sort model. > > I did not think it was necessary to have the extra number on the > transaction row, just l

Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-05 Thread Robert Fewell
Alex, There is only one header row but the titles change depending on which row you are on in the register. This is deliberate to utilises the sort model. I did not think it was necessary to have the extra number on the transaction row, just looked a bit cluttered so have left it out. If you thin

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-04 Thread Alex Aycinena
Robert, On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> > To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > Cc: > Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 19:37:02 +0100 > Subject: Time for 2.5.1 > I have added a patch o

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-04 Thread John Ralls
On May 4, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Friday 03 May 2013 19:37:02 Robert Fewell wrote: >> I have added a patch on bug 699614 which should change the defaults as >> requested. >> >> Regards, >> >> Robert. >> ___ >> gnucash-devel mail

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-04 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 03 May 2013 19:37:02 Robert Fewell wrote: > I have added a patch on bug 699614 which should change the defaults as > requested. > > Regards, > > Robert. > ___ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org

Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-03 Thread Robert Fewell
Robert, Robert Fewell <14ubobit at gmail.com > writes: >* I have added a patch on bug 699614 which should change the defaults as*>* >requested.* Does this change the Business/Invoice register to use the new register code, too, or just Acc

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-03 Thread Derek Atkins
Robert, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> writes: > I have added a patch on bug 699614 which should change the defaults as > requested. Does this change the Business/Invoice register to use the new register code, too, or just Account registers? (I'm just curious) > Regards, > > Robert. -dere

Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-03 Thread Robert Fewell
I have added a patch on bug 699614 which should change the defaults as requested. Regards, Robert. ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-03 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 03 May 2013 07:50:59 John Ralls wrote: Derek launched a trunk build yesterday and it completed and copied to Code, so maybe it will be OK. Your changes this morning were too late to trip a rebuild, so we'll have to see if it completes on its own tomorrow morning. Derek also set 2.4

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-03 Thread John Ralls
On May 3, 2013, at 5:36 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Thursday 02 May 2013 11:41:58 John Ralls wrote: > > It's a new month and time for a new release of the 2.5 series. I propose to > > tag on Saturday around noon PDT (1700Z). Is there anything that needs doing > > to get ready? In particular,

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-03 Thread Geert Janssens
On Thursday 02 May 2013 11:41:58 John Ralls wrote: > It's a new month and time for a new release of the 2.5 series. I propose to > tag on Saturday around noon PDT (1700Z). Is there anything that needs doing > to get ready? In particular, is the Win32 build issue fixed? > > Regards, > John Ralls >

Re: Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-02 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2013, 11:41:58 schrieb John Ralls: > It's a new month and time for a new release of the 2.5 series. I propose to > tag on Saturday around noon PDT (1700Z). Is there anything that needs doing > to get ready? In particular, is the Win32 build issue fixed? Currently the win32 bu

Time for 2.5.1

2013-05-02 Thread John Ralls
It's a new month and time for a new release of the 2.5 series. I propose to tag on Saturday around noon PDT (1700Z). Is there anything that needs doing to get ready? In particular, is the Win32 build issue fixed? Regards, John Ralls ___ gnucash-devel