Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-22 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-20 06:23, schrieb john: On Nov 19, 2023, at 10:23, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-19 18:26, schrieb john: On Nov 19, 2023, at 08:02, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-18 20:32, schrieb john: On Nov 17, 2023, at 17:23, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-17

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-19 Thread john
> On Nov 19, 2023, at 10:23, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Am 2023-11-19 18:26, schrieb john: > >> >> >>> On Nov 19, 2023, at 08:02, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Am 2023-11-18 20:32, schrieb john: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 17, 2023, at 17:23, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Am

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-19 Thread john
> On Nov 19, 2023, at 08:02, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Am 2023-11-18 20:32, schrieb john: > >> >> >>> On Nov 17, 2023, at 17:23, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Am 2023-11-17 05:58, schrieb john: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 16, 2023, at 14:25, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Am

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-19 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-18 20:32, schrieb john: On Nov 17, 2023, at 17:23, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-17 05:58, schrieb john: On Nov 16, 2023, at 14:25, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-16 18:41, schrieb john: On Nov 16, 2023, at 03:50, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am 2023-11-07

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-18 Thread john
> On Nov 17, 2023, at 17:23, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Am 2023-11-17 05:58, schrieb john: > >> >> >>> On Nov 16, 2023, at 14:25, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Am 2023-11-16 18:41, schrieb john: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 16, 2023, at 03:50, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-17 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-17 05:58, schrieb john: On Nov 16, 2023, at 14:25, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-16 18:41, schrieb john: On Nov 16, 2023, at 03:50, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi John, Am

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-17 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-17 05:58, schrieb john: On Nov 16, 2023, at 14:25, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-16 18:41, schrieb john: On Nov 16, 2023, at 03:50, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi John, Am

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-16 Thread flywire
Thank you for the post below and copy of PM from Manfred advising of his successful Windows compile. Clearly, the instructions don't work as published and this information is important. 1. Did you set-executionpolicy Unrestricted (ie set-executionpolicy -executionpolicy Unrestricted -scope

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-16 Thread john
> On Nov 16, 2023, at 14:25, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Am 2023-11-16 18:41, schrieb john: > >> >> >>> On Nov 16, 2023, at 03:50, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>>

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-16 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-16 18:41, schrieb john: On Nov 16, 2023, at 03:50, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi John, Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-16 Thread john
> On Nov 16, 2023, at 03:50, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: > >> >> >>> On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Hi John, >>> >>> Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote:

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-16 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-13 05:07, schrieb john: On Nov 12, 2023, at 18:13, Manfred Usselmann wrote: 1) /mingw64/lib/pkgconfig 1) /mingw64/share/pkgconfig 2) /c/Users/mu/Entwicklung/GnuCash/gcdev64/gnucash/stable/inst/lib/pkgconfig 3) /c/Users/mu/Entwicklung/GnuCash/gcdev64/msys2/mingw32/lib/pkgconfig

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-16 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Hi, Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi John, Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am 2023-10-01 17:47, schrieb john: On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: On Sun,

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-15 Thread Sherlock
> On Nov 15, 2023, at 3:15 PM, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 2023-11-12 01:19, schrieb Sherlock: > >> For what it may be worth, I have been successful building and packaging >> GnuCash 5.4 on Windows 10 with mingw-w64-i686-webkitgtk3-2.4.11-999.5-any in >> a recent (2023-07-18)

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-12 Thread john
> On Nov 12, 2023, at 18:13, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > 1) /mingw64/lib/pkgconfig > 1) /mingw64/share/pkgconfig > 2) /c/Users/mu/Entwicklung/GnuCash/gcdev64/gnucash/stable/inst/lib/pkgconfig > 3) /c/Users/mu/Entwicklung/GnuCash/gcdev64/msys2/mingw32/lib/pkgconfig 1) indicates you've

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-12 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-12 05:55, schrieb john: On Nov 11, 2023, at 17:47, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-11 18:46, schrieb john: On Nov 11, 2023, at 04:18, Manfred Usselmann wrote: # Next issue: # --- *** Checking out

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-11 Thread john
> On Nov 11, 2023, at 17:47, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Am 2023-11-11 18:46, schrieb john: >>> On Nov 11, 2023, at 04:18, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> # Next issue: >>> # >>> --- >>> *** Checking out gnucash-git

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-11 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-11 18:46, schrieb john: On Nov 11, 2023, at 04:18, Manfred Usselmann wrote: # Next issue: # --- *** Checking out gnucash-git *** [12/14] [...] CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:345 (message): Neither guile

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-11 Thread Sherlock
On Nov 11, 2023, at 12:46, John wrote: > >> >> On Nov 11, 2023, at 04:18, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >> >> Am 2023-11-10 10:26, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: >>> Am 2023-11-10 08:40, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: I have opened a ticket since this looks like a jhbuild issue for me:

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-11 Thread john
> On Nov 11, 2023, at 04:18, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Am 2023-11-10 10:26, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: >> Am 2023-11-10 08:40, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: >>> I have opened a ticket since this looks like a jhbuild issue for me: >>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/jhbuild/-/issues/290 >> It's

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-11 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-10 10:26, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: Am 2023-11-10 08:40, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: I have opened a ticket since this looks like a jhbuild issue for me: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/jhbuild/-/issues/290 It's just a simple typo, see

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-10 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-10 08:40, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: Am 2023-11-10 01:21, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: Am 2023-11-09 22:46, schrieb John Ralls: Then do a mingw32 build like the distribution. We know that works. Ok, this looks better but ends with I: Deleting .la file:

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-09 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-10 01:21, schrieb Manfred Usselmann: Am 2023-11-09 22:46, schrieb John Ralls: Then do a mingw32 build like the distribution. We know that works. Ok, this looks better but ends with I: Deleting .la file:

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-09 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Am 2023-11-09 22:46, schrieb John Ralls: On Nov 9, 2023, at 1:38 PM, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Am 2023-10-01 17:47,

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-09 Thread John Ralls
> On Nov 9, 2023, at 1:38 PM, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Hi > > Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: > >> >> >>> On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> >>> Hi John, >>> >>> Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote:

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-09 Thread Manfred Usselmann
Hi Am 2023-11-07 04:53, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi John, Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am 2023-10-01 17:47, schrieb john: On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: On Sun, October

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-06 Thread john
> On Nov 6, 2023, at 16:12, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Hi John, > > Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: >>> On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Am 2023-10-01 17:47, schrieb john: > On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: > On Sun, October 1, 2023

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-06 Thread Manfred Usselmann via gnucash-devel
Hi John, Am 2023-11-06 19:31, schrieb john: On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote: Hi, Am 2023-10-01 17:47, schrieb john: On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: On Sun, October 1, 2023 12:00 am, flywire wrote:

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-06 Thread john
> On Nov 6, 2023, at 05:11, Manfred Usselmann wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 2023-10-01 17:47, schrieb john: >>> On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: >>> On Sun, October 1, 2023 12:00 am, flywire wrote: https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2023-April/106619.html John

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-06 Thread Manfred Usselmann via gnucash-devel
Hi, Am 2023-10-01 17:47, schrieb john: On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: On Sun, October 1, 2023 12:00 am, flywire wrote: https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2023-April/106619.html John wrote: we don't have a Windows CI action, the nightly builds are done with the

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-05 Thread flywire
That would be https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2020-May/045079.html . I put too much time into it and sought help a number of times (posts are in dev over a long period) but nothing useful eventuated. iirc I'm fairly sure I didn't get the first step configured for powershell. I

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-11-05 Thread Manfred Usselmann via gnucash-devel
Hi flywire, Am 2023-10-01 17:47, schrieb john: On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: Hi, On Sun, October 1, 2023 12:00 am, flywire wrote: https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2023-April/106619.html John wrote: we don't have a Windows CI action, the nightly builds are

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-10-01 Thread john
> On Oct 1, 2023, at 06:00, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, October 1, 2023 12:00 am, flywire wrote: >> https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2023-April/106619.html >> John wrote: >> >>> we don't have a Windows CI action, the nightly builds are done with the >>>

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-10-01 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, On Sun, October 1, 2023 12:00 am, flywire wrote: > https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2023-April/106619.html > John wrote: > >> we don't have a Windows CI action, the nightly builds are done with the >> https://github.com/gnucash/GnuCash-on-windows powershell scripts on a >>

[GNC-dev] Windows Build VM

2023-09-30 Thread flywire
https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2023-April/106619.html John wrote: > we don't have a Windows CI action, the nightly builds are done with the > https://github.com/gnucash/GnuCash-on-windows powershell scripts on a > Windows VM in Derek's basement. Derek, Can you make that VM

[GNC-dev] Windows build of GnuCash

2022-04-04 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi, I needed to setup my build installation again as I corrupted my existing one and these were my observations. Using the current setup-ming64.ps1, but I did notice the webkit version was at 999.4 but on sourceforge there was 999.5 so I changed to using that version which rebuilt my c:\gcdev64

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build has failed

2021-01-21 Thread John Ralls
> On Jan 21, 2021, at 6:35 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > The Windows nightly build has failed since the libofx upgrade. > Fails at... > > C:/gcdev64/gnucash/maint/src/libofx-0.10.0/lib/ofx_preproc.cpp:317:39: > error: invalid conversion from 'const char**' to

[GNC-dev] Windows build has failed

2021-01-21 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi, The Windows nightly build has failed since the libofx upgrade. Fails at... C:/gcdev64/gnucash/maint/src/libofx-0.10.0/lib/ofx_preproc.cpp:317:39: error: invalid conversion from 'const char**' to 'char**' [-fpermissive] 317 | , , |

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build issue

2020-10-05 Thread Geert Janssens
Op maandag 5 oktober 2020 17:12:18 CEST schreef Geert Janssens: > As mentioned on the aqbanking beta thread on gnucash-user there was an issue > on our Windows nightly build server. > > I'll add some more details here on gnucash-devel for posterity. > > I made a package dependency change in the

[GNC-dev] Windows build issue

2020-10-05 Thread Geert Janssens
As mentioned on the aqbanking beta thread on gnucash-user there was an issue on our Windows nightly build server. I'll add some more details here on gnucash-devel for posterity. I made a package dependency change in the past weekend - I have added mingw- swig and dropped msys-swig from the

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-13 Thread Robert Fewell
John, Thank you, log file back to how it was. Regards, Bob On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 22:49, John Ralls wrote: > I'd screwed up a couple of things, now fixed and pushed. > > Regards, > John Ralls > > > > On May 12, 2020, at 9:22 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > > > Bob, > > > > I found that late

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-12 Thread John Ralls
I'd screwed up a couple of things, now fixed and pushed. Regards, John Ralls > On May 12, 2020, at 9:22 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > Bob, > > I found that late yesterday afternoon. It seems to be from my change changing > the mapping of log level by log domain from GHashTable to nested C++ >

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-12 Thread John Ralls
Bob, I found that late yesterday afternoon. It seems to be from my change changing the mapping of log level by log domain from GHashTable to nested C++ std::vectors. If I don't get it sorted shortly I'll revert that change. Regards, John Ralls > On May 12, 2020, at 4:28 AM, Robert Fewell

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-12 Thread Robert Fewell
John, So the logging is different now, updated master on my Linux VM and with nothing else changed in that environment which has been building with -ggdb. Built OK but when I ran it I ended up with an unresponsive Gnucash, ended up by force quitting. Looked at the trace file which was 1.6GB.

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-11 Thread John Ralls
> On May 11, 2020, at 4:45 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > #6 0x0244ae57 in qof_log_check (domain=0x0, level=(QOF_LOG_WARNING | > unknown: 2)) > at > C:/gcdev64/gnucash/master/src/gnucash-git/libgnucash/engine/qoflog.cpp:308 That's what I suspected. I made

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-11 Thread Robert Fewell
John, I think I have found the difference, I had not installed Perl, normally I would get these in the trace file... * 12:31:29 WARN <> Could not spawn perl: Failed to execute child process (Bad file descriptor) * 12:31:29 ERROR <> gnc_process_get_fd: assertion 'proc' failed * 12:31:29 ERROR <>

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-10 Thread John Ralls
> On May 10, 2020, at 9:30 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > > >> On May 10, 2020, at 7:44 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Just trying a change but my build failed to run, tried the nightlies and >> the Windows build 3.902 gf23e3b266 fails to run also but the one before

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-10 Thread John Ralls
> On May 10, 2020, at 7:44 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > Just trying a change but my build failed to run, tried the nightlies and > the Windows build 3.902 gf23e3b266 fails to run also but the one before > does f1ff78965 > All it says "Unspecified fatal error

[GNC-dev] Windows build fails to run

2020-05-10 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi, Just trying a change but my build failed to run, tried the nightlies and the Windows build 3.902 gf23e3b266 fails to run also but the one before does f1ff78965 All it says "Unspecified fatal error encountered, aborting" Regards, Bob ___

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build problem

2019-09-13 Thread John Ralls
Yes, Thanks. Committed on your behalf and pushed. Regards, John Ralls > On Sep 13, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Matthew Forbis via gnucash-devel > wrote: > > I might have fixed it myself. Does the following change make sense? > > > > CMakeLists.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build problem

2019-09-13 Thread Matthew Forbis via gnucash-devel
I might have fixed it myself.  Does the following change make sense?  CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index 0654dfb5a..b054f9cc2 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/CMakeLists.txt @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ if

[GNC-dev] Windows Build problem

2019-09-13 Thread Matthew Forbis via gnucash-devel
Hi, I'm attempting to build on windows to try to still solve the report bug I'm interested in and it seems that the patch below might have broken the windows build (or I don't know what I'm doing is also a possibilty). With the commit John pushed yesterday, I get the following error message

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build

2019-05-13 Thread Geert Janssens
Hi Bob, I have removed the gnucash build directory on the windows build server and kicked off a new build. Let's see if that deals with the file permissions. I also reset the docs repository on the server as it has gotten stuck on a failed pull. Geert Op maandag 13 mei 2019 12:33:38 CEST

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build

2019-05-13 Thread Robert Fewell
Derek, Thanks for that and regarding the sorting I never noticed that, just tried it and will save the book mark in that order. Bob On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 11:51, Derek Atkins wrote: > HI, > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 6:33 am, Robert Fewell wrote: > > Hi guys, looks like the windows build has been

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build

2019-05-13 Thread Derek Atkins
HI, On Mon, May 13, 2019 6:33 am, Robert Fewell wrote: > Hi guys, looks like the windows build has been created in fro the last few > days, the last one being 10/05/2019 and looking at the logs it is failing > with a permission error. Could some one have a look and give it a kick. If John or

[GNC-dev] Windows build

2019-05-13 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi guys, looks like the windows build has been created in fro the last few days, the last one being 10/05/2019 and looking at the logs it is failing with a permission error. Could some one have a look and give it a kick. Some thing I have noticed is the exe has increased in size again on the

[GNC-dev] Windows build

2019-04-11 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi, Does the Windows build server run the tests, I was going to add a unc file path uri to test-gnc-uri-utils.c Can I run them locally, if yes how ? Regards, Bob ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build server

2019-03-27 Thread Robert Fewell
Thank you John, could you do one more but just with -Q, sorry I should of tested the command before I asked, looks like -e restricts the list to only ones explicitly installed. Regards, Bob On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 21:37, John Ralls wrote: > Here you go. mingw64-config.txt is with q,

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build server

2019-03-26 Thread John Ralls
Here you go. mingw64-config.txt is with q, mingw64-config-ext.txt without it. Regards, John Ralls asciidoc 8.6.10-1 autoconf 2.69-5 autoconf2.13 2.13-2 autogen 5.18.16-1 automake-wrapper 11-1 automake1.10 1.10.3-3 automake1.11 1.11.6-3 automake1.12 1.12.6-3 automake1.13 1.13.4-4 automake1.14

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build server

2019-03-26 Thread Robert Fewell
I am still having trouble and I think it is down to my build system being to up to date and maybe incompatible library versions, looking at a the files from a nightly build, they seem to be older so I am wondering if that is my problem. Is it possible that some one with console access run the

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build server

2019-03-24 Thread John Ralls
Bob, When it can't find libtest-core-guile.so itself it says "the specified *file* could not be found" (my emphasis); "the specified module could not be found" means that the linker couldn't find one of the dependencies of libtest-core-guile.so. That includes the whole Gtk stack,

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build server

2019-03-24 Thread Robert Fewell
Thanks John, Yesterday I did manage to build and then install a working version but found my changes for 'transaction associations' needed some work, change the source file and tried to rebuild and now it wont. I do not know why it wont but it so frustrating Cleared my build and install

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows build server

2019-03-22 Thread John Ralls
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 2:12 PM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just wondering if any body has setup a windows build environment recently, > I mistakenly ran setup-mingw64.ps1 which updated my setup, a good 100 plus > packages were updated and now I can not run a build

[GNC-dev] Windows build server

2019-03-22 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi, Just wondering if any body has setup a windows build environment recently, I mistakenly ran setup-mingw64.ps1 which updated my setup, a good 100 plus packages were updated and now I can not run a build from scratch, builds I think 4 package dependencies and fails on xmlsec. Will investigate

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build not working

2018-09-16 Thread John Ralls
All fixed. https://code.gnucash.org/builds/win32/maint/gnucash-3.2-2018-09-16-git-3.2-275-g162605f50+.setup.exe runs correctly. Regards, John Ralls > On Sep 16, 2018, at 11:37 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > That part I can replicate on MacOS, so I've fixed it. My Windows build > process is

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build not working

2018-09-16 Thread John Ralls
That part I can replicate on MacOS, so I've fixed it. My Windows build process is still broken (a guile compile problem with loading dlls) so I'm just going to push what I think will fix the binreloc problem on Windows and test tomorrow's nightly. Regards, John Ralls > On Sep 16, 2018, at

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build not working

2018-09-16 Thread Robert Fewell
OK, I have found the register date problem which is down to commit Make selection caching uniform across gnucash-sheet functions. more specificity if I comment out the addition of lines 402 and 403 the date cursor

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build not working

2018-09-15 Thread John Ralls
> On Sep 15, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > Came across this today when trying to find a build with a working register > date edit to see if I can find which commit broke it. > For information in a register, click in the date field which removes the >

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build

2018-05-18 Thread Robert Fewell
Thank you, that makes it clearer now. Bob On 17 May 2018 at 18:22, John Ralls wrote: > > > > On May 17, 2018, at 9:49 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > > > Op donderdag 17 mei 2018 18:11:49 CEST schreef Robert Fewell: > >> Trying to answer my own

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build

2018-05-17 Thread John Ralls
> On May 17, 2018, at 9:49 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op donderdag 17 mei 2018 18:11:49 CEST schreef Robert Fewell: >> Trying to answer my own question... >> >> I assume the file size difference is because the nightly have debug >> information built in. >> >

Re: [GNC-dev] Windows Build

2018-05-17 Thread Geert Janssens
Op donderdag 17 mei 2018 18:11:49 CEST schreef Robert Fewell: > Trying to answer my own question... > > I assume the file size difference is because the nightly have debug > information built in. > Indeed. > I know the last bit is the commit it is based on, can not see why they > start with 'g'

[GNC-dev] Windows Build

2018-05-17 Thread Robert Fewell
Trying to answer my own question... I assume the file size difference is because the nightly have debug information built in. I know the last bit is the commit it is based on, can not see why they start with 'g' but can find 5f5ad968f but not d2ef5fd0f Regards, Bob