Maybe, because it's all we've got for differentiating two securities with the
same symbol.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Apr 22, 2023, at 1:20 AM, Fred Tydeman wrote:
>
> Is there a relationship between Security Namespaces and Trading accounts?
> If I change which Namespace a security is in,
Is there a relationship between Security Namespaces and Trading accounts?
If I change which Namespace a security is in, should that affect a Trading
account?
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:29 PM john wrote:
> No, the naming scheme is hard-coded. Ralf Habacker made a start at
> removing name
No, the naming scheme is hard-coded. Ralf Habacker made a start at removing
name dependencies but got it working only for opening balance accounts.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Apr 21, 2023, at 9:30 AM, Fred Tydeman wrote:
>
> Can Trading accounts be moved around?
> That is, given a new parent.
>
This is one side of the story. For another view of things you might
take a look at
https://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/accounting/tutorial.html. You
could also look at
https://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/accounting/gnucash.html which is
outdated but still might be useful.
If you want
Geoff,
Changing values of reconciled transactions without notice renders a book
completely unreliable for any accounting purpose. If that's not evil, what is?
David T.
On July 27, 2022 2:46:34 PM GMT+03:00, Geoff wrote:
>Lots.
>
>(And they aren't really evil, just wilful).
>
>;--))
>
>Geoff
The thread I started, with the title "Evil Lots Behavior" was about the Gnucash
*Lots* feature, which is designed to "assist" users in the management of
individual lots of stock and mutual fund shares. (For the record, the lots
feature will change reconciled gains transactions without
Lots.
(And they aren't really evil, just wilful).
;--))
Geoff
=
On 27/07/2022 8:36 pm, David Carlson wrote:
This has confused me. Is the recent thread titled "
[GNC] Evil Lots Behavior" about lots or trading accounts?
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 12:10 AM David T. wrote:
David C.
This has confused me. Is the recent thread titled "
[GNC] Evil Lots Behavior" about lots or trading accounts?
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 12:10 AM David T. wrote:
> David C.
>
> Trading accounts are not the same as lots. Different concept, different
> code. Just a for instance: trading accounts
David C.
Trading accounts are not the same as lots. Different concept, different code.
Just a for instance: trading accounts are turned on by book; lots can be
enabled by account.
David T.
On July 27, 2022 3:33:37 AM GMT+03:00, David Carlson
wrote:
>I believe that you are witnessing first
I forgot to address fixing the mess.
I think there are two ways to fix it. The easiest is to restore your last
backup from before turning on TA's.
The other, iirc, is to manually delete all those TA's.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 7:24 PM wrote:
> Fred,
>
> Not early in the guide, but in the section
I believe that you are witnessing first hand why trading accounts are not
enabled by default, i.e. they create a royal mess in your trading history.
You might want to re-read the recent thread about evil trading accounts.
They may work ok for some users who's documentation goals align with the
Fred,
Not early in the guide, but in the section dealing with multiple currencies
https://www.gnucash.org/docs/v4/C/gnucash-guide/currency_trading_accts.html and
discussed on the wiki (https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Trading_Accounts).
I don't think anyone has yet written anything about any
On 4 Apr 2021, at 3:29, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think I should file bug reports?
Sure, if you can specify detailed step by step instructions for
reproducing the errors. The more information you can give the more
likely it is to get fixed.
Mike
On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 03:21 -0400, Mike Alexander wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2021, at 1:31, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Another issue that I just realized and is related to the
> > functionality
> > of trading accounts, but maybe not the one that we are discussing
> > here,
> > is the
On 3 Apr 2021, at 1:31, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
Another issue that I just realized and is related to the functionality
of trading accounts, but maybe not the one that we are discussing
here,
is the security/currency of the top level placeholder account Trading.
Shouldn't that be set
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 13:38 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 2, 2021, at 12:23 PM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 11:58 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Apr 2, 2021, at 9:42 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri,
> On Apr 2, 2021, at 12:23 PM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 11:58 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 2, 2021, at 9:42 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 08:47 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2021, at
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 11:58 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 2, 2021, at 9:42 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 08:47 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Apr 2, 2021, at 8:37 AM, John Ralls
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 2, 2021, at
> On Apr 2, 2021, at 9:42 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 08:47 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 2, 2021, at 8:37 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 2, 2021, at 4:05 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
which by the way it
does not
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 08:47 -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 2, 2021, at 8:37 AM, John Ralls wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 2, 2021, at 4:05 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > which by the way it
> > > does not use the default security fraction which is 1/
> > > but
> > >
> On Apr 2, 2021, at 8:37 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2021, at 4:05 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> which by the way it
>> does not use the default security fraction which is 1/ but
>> 1/.
>
> The price is in Euro, so it displays as 1/100 of the Euro's
On Apr 2, 2021, at 4:05 AM, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> which by the way it
> does not use the default security fraction which is 1/ but
> 1/.
The price is in Euro, so it displays as 1/100 of the Euro's fraction. That's
for display only, the actual calculated price is as
I have been using lots and scrubing my investment accounts to track
realized gains. But since I have turned on trading accounts I have not
scrubbed any account.
I am attaching an example of 2 splits created after turning on trading
accounts. As a side-note some of the account names are in
On 28 Mar 2021, at 11:21, zuperkoleopt...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem I am facing is the following, after activating trading
accounts the system created the hierarchy for all the trading
accounts,
but also created a bunch of splits in already recorded transactions.
So
from the beginning the
24 matches
Mail list logo