Found that I sent the reply to gnucash-dev instead of gnucash-user
accidentally. Re-posting here.
Thanks, so the "Job" seems a work in progress feature, and the
"Default Chargeback Project" didn't do anything useful in its current
form?
Also, since I'm reviewing the GnuCash translation of my
So you now at least have the F::Q module for Perl installed that works from GNC
and that mean you have some ability to download prices.
Now comes the tricky and rinse-repeat part—you will have to ascertain by
experiment which F::Q source provides price for the security of interest. For
> , but if you set Current Assets to a placeholder account, it should be hidden
> from the selection list when posting invoices to avoid this issue in the
> future.
Current Assets for should be a place holder account. It was not set to Place
Holder. It is now set to Place Holder.
I started an
I could be mistaken, but if you set Current Assets to a placeholder
account, it should be hidden from the selection list when posting
invoices to avoid this issue in the future.
If that doesn't work, I'd consider it a bug.
Regards,
Adrien
On 5/15/23 12:31 PM, Don Gray wrote:
If
On 2023-05-15 09:57, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> Alternatively, you might have hidden child accounts. Those will get
> rolled up but aren't individually visible.
If the OP is talking about a report, those child accounts might have
been added after the last time accounts were selected in Report
> If it's the former, you might have transactions in Current Assets.
I found two invoices that had the income account set to Current Assets, not the
actual income account. Unposting, fixing, reposting and then processing the
payment fixed the “odd” number.
Current Assets now equal
I'll assume that "some number" <> $6,621.66, first.
Next, is that from the Chart of Accounts, or a report?
If it's the former, you might have transactions in Current Assets.
If it's the latter, there may be other accounts beneath Current Assets that
haven't been selected for display, but
Arguably, AR is 'current', but of course, you can organize any way you want.
As to the question, I'm guessing you are looking at the Total column on
the Accounts tab. (if you see these figures somewhere else, please advise)
That *should* be simply a roll-up total of the child accounts.
An
I may have missed something, or maybe got creative with entering data.
My account structure
Assets
Accounts Receivable - $ 0.00
Current Assets - -$6,621.66
Checking Account - $ some number
Petty Cash - $0.00
Savings Account - $ 0.00
The intention was to highlight the response used accounts, not the built-in
tax report, rather than suggest the tax report should be available to
Australians. I imagine the report allows tax codes to be attached to
accounts and sums all accounts for the same code. I was taught to align
accounts to
10 matches
Mail list logo
