Re: [GNC] Hard-Copy Report Output

2023-06-09 Thread rsbrux via gnucash-user
Thanks for the advice, but these (custom) reports consist of pie charts and an accompanying legend. Without the graphics they are useless. The Html export still included them as of GC 2.19. -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023

[GNC] AQ Banking fail?

2023-06-09 Thread Keith Bellairs
I have been using online actions to get transactions from USAA Fed Savings Bank for some time. Today it failed: [image: image.png] Has anyone seen updated info on using AQ banking at this bank? Gnucash 5.1 Macos Ventura 13.4 AQBanking v6.5.4.0stable Keith

Re: [GNC] How to Upgrade Old GnuCash Version to Current Version

2023-06-09 Thread Adrien Monteleone
Agreed, that should be in the core Documentation. But of course, someone is going to have to write it. Maybe file a documentation bug for tracking? I'd think too, that at least for now, a link in the Read.me included with each release to the upgrading procedure on the Wiki would be nice.

Re: [GNC] How to search for a word in a description in an invoice

2023-06-09 Thread Adrien Monteleone
You would need to uncheck 'consolidate splits on posting' when posting the bill/invoice. There is also a default preference for this. With consolidated splits, you don't get individual line items in account registers, but rather one split per affected account. Without consolidating splits,

Re: [GNC] Hard-Copy Report Output

2023-06-09 Thread Adrien Monteleone
Have you tried exporting the report as HTML, opening in a *browser*, and then printing from there? (I see you say it doesn't include 'graphics' but which graphics are you referring to? Most reports, rather than charts, don't contain any graphics save for perhaps table borders which render just

Re: [GNC] How to Upgrade Old GnuCash Version to Current Version

2023-06-09 Thread David T. via gnucash-user
I've updated that section now. ⁣David T. ​ On Jun 8, 2023, 11:54 PM, at 11:54 PM, David Cousens wrote: >Try the wiki https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Installation#Upgrading. Not >exactly >extensive enough though. > >On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 12:17 +1000, flywire wrote: >> > If you follow the upgrade