> Simply delete the budget you entered for the parent, and you’ll see it
> now changes to a grey text as the sum of the children.
Ah, yes. This does work. I don't know why it didn't before. I must've
done something wrong. :(
I'll close the bug.
--
Thanks again,
Regards,
Ankur
emember exactly
> when. I recall years ago there were some issues in that report which
> caused me to just abandon trying to use it then and I have not tried it
> lately.
Thanks, David. I filed this:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795262
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur S
one seems to
be able to set a budget for the place-holder account separately, and
then it ceases to behave like a place-holder account where its value
should be a sum of the sub-accounts.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
D
e original "sum
of all sub accounts" behaviour?
I'm on Fedora 28 here, with Gnucash 3.0:
gnucash-3.0-1.fc28.x86_64
--
Thanks everyone,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
