Hello,
am I missing something? gpg2.exe is not installed on installation of
gpg4win 3.0.0. I am well aware that it is supposed to be the same binary as
gpg.exe, however the behaviour (namely whether to run agent / GUI pinentry
on password prompt) changes depending on how it is called. My git was
c
On 10/11/2017 at 2:33 AM, "Werner Koch" wrote:On Tue, 10 Oct 2017
20:26, ved...@nym.hush.com said:
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.11; Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.
You left out the line which tells the libgcrypt version numbers like
in
$ gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.1-beta1
lib
At Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:47:29 +0200,
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:15, n...@walfield.org said:
>
> > I'm aware of an effort that tried to port GnuPG to Android. bionic
> > was a source of several problems. As far as I know, the work is
>
> Actually we solved the Bionic problems a l
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:15, n...@walfield.org said:
> I'm aware of an effort that tried to port GnuPG to Android. bionic
> was a source of several problems. As far as I know, the work is
Actually we solved the Bionic problems a long time ago. The major
problem was actually custom pinentry for a
On Wed 2017-10-11 08:53:59 +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
>> On 2017-10-10 15:48, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>> You could try the following:
>>
>> export GNUPGHOME=$(mktemp -d)
>> gpg -d file.gpg
>> rm -rf "$GNUPGHOME"
>
> thank you, that works.
>
> But it still starts the gpg-ag
On Wed 2017-10-11 09:15:41 +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:26:21 +0200,
> Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:55, b...@adversary.org said:
>>
>> > Has anyone managed to get any part of the GPG libs to compile on
>> > Android/Linux? As far as I'm aware no one has a
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, at 05:39 PM, Whitey wrote:
> Pete Stephenson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017, at 06:53 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> >> I read once here on the Mailing List that one should only use
> >> trusted USB devices, whatever that means, when using an USB
> >> device.
> >
> > If you must u
On 11/10/17 13:04, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Permitting
> trusted machines to communicate in a *provably* one-way manner with
> systems outside the DMZ is an important problem -- not just being able
> to do it, but coming up with a way simple enough that non-technical
> users can understand.
Point
> Our frames of reference were different: I was actually mostly
> thinking about a duplex system, which if needed could be reduced to
> simplex, in which case it would be the other way around than your
> use-case. I never considered the scenario where the trusted system
> was already compromised an
On 11/10/17 04:49, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> The assumption was the web server was compromised: given that, how
> can you be absolutely sure there's no communication channel back to
> the trusted tabulator?
Ah, this isn't about corrupting data on the line, about getting wrong
data in what is the c
At Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:26:21 +0200,
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:55, b...@adversary.org said:
>
> > Has anyone managed to get any part of the GPG libs to compile on
> > Android/Linux? As far as I'm aware no one has and all OpenPGP
>
> There might be a problems with the current rel
At Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:55:32 -0400,
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
> > Amazing how much people want to comment on the color of this
> > particular bikeshed!
>
> I agree. Bikeshedding frustrates me: I'll leave it at that.
>
> Reviewing the last forty-odd emails on the subject, there are a small
> nu
> On 2017-10-10 15:48, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> You could try the following:
>
> export GNUPGHOME=$(mktemp -d)
> gpg -d file.gpg
> rm -rf "$GNUPGHOME"
thank you, that works.
But it still starts the gpg-agent.
How can I use gpg without the agent ?
13 matches
Mail list logo
