If an individual that requests his personal information is
removed (i.e., the "right to be forgotten") is EU resident,
GDPR applies regardless of the jurisdiction in which the
information server is located.
"Right to be forgotten" doesn't exist in the United States. It's a
violation of our
On 1/28/22 21:43, jonkomer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> If an individual that requests his personal information is
> removed (i.e., the "right to be forgotten") is EU resident,
> GDPR applies regardless of the jurisdiction in which the
> information server is located.
>
> Jon K.
If the server is
jonkomer via Gnupg-users wrote:
When the keyserer operator operates outside
of the EU I don't think that is a legal problem.
If an individual that requests his personal information is
removed (i.e., the "right to be forgotten") is EU resident,
GDPR applies regardless of the jurisdiction in
When the keyserer operator operates outside
of the EU I don't think that is a legal problem.
If an individual that requests his personal information is
removed (i.e., the "right to be forgotten") is EU resident,
GDPR applies regardless of the jurisdiction in which the
information server is
On 28-01-2022 21:02, jonkomer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> How do individual key-server owner/operators react to
> formal GDPR "forget me" requests; either by e-mail users, or
> by mail domain owners? Any known legal precedents?
There are known technical issues: the HKP keyserver does not allow keys
Well, I think I could extend my SPR332 [mod][1]:
* Add a push-button that one has to press to close the C7 circuit for
I/O. Without that button pressed, the smart card cannot communicate
with the reader. That means, for every operation, one would need to
hold that button, kind of
A. G. via :
The short answer is "no", or at best "not yet"...
Thank you very much for the response and comprehensive
comments.
In this case, the mail domain owner is actually the one
that needs this level of control: he insists on the ability
to positively respond to individual e-mail users'
On Freitag, 28. Januar 2022 06:11:01 CET Piotr Morgwai Kotarbinski via
Gnupg-users wrote:
> Maybe someone will find it useful:
> https://gist.github.com/morgwai/016fae4fd22f01e225509b76fee1d6c7
At least GnuPG 2.3 includes gpg-wks-client which, among other commands, has a
command to print the WKD
On 26/01/2022 22:03, jonkomer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Is there anything that a public key owner can do, to actually
> *ensure* that, if some careless or malicious correspondent
> ignores the comment ("Please do not upload...") and attempts
> to upload his or her (otherwise fully functional)
Maybe someone will find it useful:
https://gist.github.com/morgwai/016fae4fd22f01e225509b76fee1d6c7
Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users writes:
>> After I unlock an OpenPGP SmartCard V2.1 in my SPR332 [mod][1], […]
>
> Does your smartcard reader have its own keypad for entering the PIN?
yes
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
