Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Keybase (https://keybase.io) is trying to solve the Web of Trust problem
in a new way. They're currently in beta, but I was able to snag an
invitation. (I have no invites to give out, unfortunately.) The
following is just a write-up on how it works and what my
John Clizbe wrote:
Does look interesting. Anyone have and willing to share an invite?
Reply off-list please.
Invite received. Thanks to those who offered.
-J
--
John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net
SKS/Enigmail/PGP-EKP or: John
As there are many Enigmail users who read this list, but not [Enigmail], I'm
forwarding the announcement of the newest release of Enigmail, v1.7.
There are quite a few changes in this release.
As Patrick writes in the announcement:
As usually, it will take up to two weeks until the version will
Aaron Chelf wrote:
Okay so I'm using Open PGP software in conjunction with Thunderbird in
Linux. I've figured out about everything except the only way I can add
public keys to my key ring so far is to save them as an attachment from
an e-mail sent to me.
How can I just copy a public key to
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/27/2014 03:54 PM, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
Robert J. Hansen:
On 6/26/2014 5:57 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
PGP 8 was released over a decade ago, that's hardly a modern
implementation:
And yet, it still conforms (largely) to RFC4880. Methinks
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Even if they did intercept them, are the Americans any good at
interrogating a horse?
Yes. We are world champions at beating dead horses. To interrogate a
horse, first simply shoot it in the head, and then we can leverage our
dead-horse-beating skills in order to
Kristy Chambers wrote:
Although some people would probably deny, that it's not the job
gnupg.org to provide a good tutorial about using gpg for e-mail-security
with some other gpg-related software like Enigmail+Thunderbird, I would
really appreciate it. Bad tutorials on the web reaffirm my
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Is there a source code or a recipe available somewhere? Is it written in
Not that I know.
I believe John Clizbe has a copy of the Adele source code.
I still have the copy from when the Enigmail team translated to message file
from German to English six+ years ago
this
exact problem. For a while John Clizbe and I kept a list of good
papers, but I have to confess I haven't been keeping up on the latest
literature. Still, our last list is pretty good reading.
(These selections come from both John and me, but John is the one who
assembled them into proper
time: start by reading up on academic papers studying this
exact problem. For a while John Clizbe and I kept a list of good
papers, but I have to confess I haven't been keeping up on the latest
literature. Still, our last list is pretty good reading.
(These selections come from both John and me
fa-ml wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:37:11PM -0800, Justin Quakenbush wrote:
wheres my gnupg folder?
Have you tried checking 'man gpg' (search for 'FILES')? It should be
~/.gnupg/ , echo $GNUPGHOME to make sure.
GNUPGHOME isn't set by default. It is for overriding the default location.
Johan Wevers wrote:
On 23-10-2013 2:26, Olav Seyfarth wrote:
have you set your key HERE :
https://www.enigmail.net/documentation/per-account.php ?
Ah, not for this mail address. Thanks, I had not found this option.
Testing the signature now.
OpenPGP menu -- Preferences.
Click [Display
Hauke Laging wrote:
Hello,
due to its rather little visibility for the average user this affects GnuPG
less than its GUIs (the mail clients in particular). It may well be used in
the GnuPG documentation (man, info, www). But I assume that many GUI (or more
general: crypto tool)
Pete Stephenson wrote:
Hi all,
I use Thunderbird, Enigmail, and GnuPG on Windows 7 (among others).
I have my primary cert/sign key on one smartcard and two subkeys
(signature + encryption) on another. I have the force signature PIN
option enabled for both cards.
Tonight I was using the
Kenneth Jones wrote:
Hmmm... Last two messages from Daniel prompt my Thunderbird/Enigmail setup
that an OpenPGP secret key is needed to decrypt the message (which nonetheless
shows up in cleartext). What's happening? Is it signed with a public key? Can
you do that? Why would one wnt to?
kwadronaut wrote:
Hi,
Up until now, I always see signatures on a key ordered in chronological
fashion, with GnuPG, sks' web interface and enigmail. It's always in a
format with day, month and year (sometimes year-month-day or another
format of that data). Now I'm curious to see when a
Marcio B. Jr. wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:22, marcio.barb...@gmail.com said:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2013-September/003180.html
Please do not post a mere link. This assume that everyone is online
Pete Stephenson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:57 PM, MartinHvidberg mar...@hvidberg.net wrote:
Or do I need to get one of my old computers up and running, hoping to find
some sort of key file there.
If you go through your old systems and are able to find the relevant
secret key files or
Martin T wrote:
Hi,
I need to create a public and private key pair for a person
representing an organization, upload the public key to RIPE(regional
Internet registry in Europe) public server, create some database
entries using those public and private keys and finally hand over the
Martin T wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the reply!
I think method in the example above is just indicating that this is a PGP
key.
Exactly. However, how does RIPE server-side software detect that it's
a PGP key? Is this information(besides other information like key
creation date and UID)
kardan wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 20:20:16 -0500 Larry Brower
ivangrun...@gmail.com wrote:
http://keyserver.stack.nl also uses SSL. Is your main t that someone
will see the keys you are looking for or retrieving?
If this is the case then why not have them send them to you encrypted
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 07/13/2013 05:39 AM, Ximin Luo wrote:
When we got to the part where we receive an email signed by a key which has
not
yet been verified by a trusted key, GPG outputs the familiar phrase
UNTRUSTED
Good signature. Now previously, I didn't think too much of this,
Burkhard Schroeder wrote:
On 08-Jul-13 6:34 AM, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote:
How about a lemur? They have masked varieties (and they are cute).
Raccoon also comes to mind...
But they are not associated with security. And security is not cute.
What about Erinaceidae ? They look cute, are
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
snip
Digging this old message up as i try to do some triage. i don't think i
ever heard a response about this.
I'm still seeing the same problem, only with some UIDs and not others:
0 dkg@alice:/tmp/cdtemp.fre2o5$ LANG=C gpg --keyserver keys.mayfirst.org
Werewolf wrote:
Is there an option that when refreshing the keys, or batch command that
will download the keys needed to verify sigs of the keys on public key
ring?
No, but it may be scripted. Example pulled from list archive:
gpg --check-sigs| grep User ID not found|cut -b 14-21| sort
Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
The last time I looked at it, I had to install GPG4Win or
one of the GPG 1.x installs before I put Enigmail in THunderbird
on Windows. EnigMail is licensed under MPLv2/GPLv2 to avoid
licensing issues. If Enigmail doesn't bundle when they have
compatible licensing
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/29/2013 11:28 PM, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
| First, whose advice?
The advice of the people who actually write Enigmail. All of your
irrelevant stuff aside, you still haven't explained yourself.
Speaking as one of those people who took part in the discussion
pradeep kumar wrote:
Hi Werner,
Yes I have used both the commands as separate but when I am trying to run
command I am getting the below error can you please let me know how to
eliminate this.
Inline image 1
But I can able to encrypt the files normally after asking y option.
Try
Veet Vivarto wrote:
Hello Werner,
My friend and I, are working on a easy to use front-end for GPG for Windows
and Mac.
On Windows we are using the 1.4.11 because it only requires two files (.exe,
.dll)
Just curious, which DLL? I just did a test with the 1.4.13 installer and
didn't see
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
As the padding scheme in RSA, (OAEP) uses SHA-1, then , *eventually*, as
people move away from using SHA-1, and toward a V5 key where SHA-1 is not
used,
will it also be necessary to re-do the RSA padding to not use SHA-1, and
if so, would this fall under the
I.V. Frost wrote:
Am I the only having trouble both the key for this message and the one
with the binaries? My installation tells me it is not Key ID:
0x99242560 but key 0xA1BC4FA4 which is not found on any server that I use.
Something sounds odd about the search criteria or keyserver
Casey Marshall wrote:
On 11/05/2012 11:12 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 11/05/2012 04:04 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 11/04/2012 10:46 PM, Casey Marshall wrote:
I’d like to share Hockeypuck, an OpenPGP Keyserver I’ve
developed in Go (http://golang.org).
Cool, i'm glad to hear of
j...@dodec.lt wrote:
Ok thanks, just found that compiling gpg without agent can be workaround
as well.
On 10/27/2012 10:17 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 10/27/2012 3:12 PM, j...@dodec.lt wrote:
Is it somehow possible to bypass ncurses dialog window?
You want to use GnuPG 1.4, which does
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 10/29/2012 2:05 PM, User wrote:
You may want to take a look at GPGshell for an alternative.
GPGshell is not Free Software, and for that reason it's not exactly
appropriate to recommend it on this list. Whether we agree or disagree
with the Free Software
Kristain left these groups off the initial email
-John
Original Message
Subject: [Sks-devel] [Announcement] SKS 1.1.4 Released
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 22:24:27 +0200
From: Kristian Fiskerstrand kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com
To: sks-devel sks-de...@nongnu.org
Hello,
No such Client wrote:
With due respect Mr Lebbing, my initial post -
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2012-August/045291.html
was in response to Mr. Hansen´s post
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2012-August/045269.html
which (from my perspective) was
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 08/24/2012 08:24 AM, peter.segm...@wronghead.com wrote:
I propose to you (and to the people who are putting all that hard
work into gpg) that there are actually two things killing PKI:
At risk of sounding dismissive, I really don't care what your pet theory
is
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 08/24/2012 07:33 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Thank you, John. Simson Garfinkel has another one worth adding to the
list, but I'm blanking on it for the life of me right now -- give me a
day or two to dig through my pile of papers and I'll come up with it.
Chatting
Sam Smith wrote:
Oh, phooey. You are right. I was mistaken. I meant PGP/MIME. I guess no ECC
then?
No... S/MIME -- X.509. PGP/MIME -- OpenPGP.
ECC is part of OpenPGP with the issuance of RFC 6637 at the first of June this
year.
As Kristian pointed out, the GnuPG Development line currently
David Shaw wrote:
On Aug 8, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Jay Litwyn wrote:
On 2012-08-08 2:20 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 07/08/12 15:18, Jay Litwyn wrote:
I submitted this revokation certificate to a couple of servers and
they said it was malformed, and I had trouble guessing how to
generate
John wrote:
Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote in message
news:87lijbfbzk.fsf__7982.15741892836$1340651488$gmane$o...@vigenere.g10code.de...
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 23:22, jw72...@verizon.net said:
message when I use GPA to try retrieving a key. The message states
this: There is no plugin
David Shaw wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
1) If the keyserver (of whatever type) isn't reachable...
As you say, easy to solve: agreed.
2) Concern that enough people turning this feature on would add
significant load to the keyserver network...
I don't
da...@gbenet.com wrote:
insanely ridiculous amount of untrimmed quoted noise snipped
Hello Sam,
Most people are normal users of pgp - I suspect there are few secret
government agents - not that they are likely to say so :)
though some believe them to be everywhere.
Secret agents may or
Rupali Chitre wrote:
Hello,
I want to opt out from emails. I don't see unsubscribe option. How can I
opt out?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Visit the link above -
tim.kac...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it should be okay to dredge up this topic ever couple years. From
what I am reading, links below, I do not feel comfortable with the key
length and algorithmic security offered by GPG's defaults.
[I think I write this same email on one list or another at
tim.kac...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it should be okay to dredge up this topic ever couple years. From
what I am reading, links below, I do not feel comfortable with the key
length and algorithmic security offered by GPG's defaults.
I have not been able to figure out how to get keylengths
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
06.05.2012 21:15, Peter Lebbing kirjoitti:
It does say in the gpg --help output:
(See the man page for a complete listing of all commands and
options)
There are many more options and also commands in the full man(ual)
page. I suppose it was thought that exporting
Ali Lown wrote:
I am trying to use gpg-agent for my ssh keys as well as my gpg keys,
but am unable to add my 8192 bit ssh key to the agent.
Agent log reports: 2012-05-03 17:48:02 gpg-agent[2190] ssh keys
greater than 4096 bits are not supported
The limit appears to be arbitarily set in
Faramir wrote:
El 12-04-2012 20:29, John Clizbe escribió:
...
pool.sks-keyservers.net adds them to its own list. So really,
that's the only address you need. :)
It's best to stick with the pool address, otherwise if you select a
single server, you'll run into trouble if it's offline
Mustrum wrote:
How can we use private IPs ?
See below.
OK, here's my list of addresses:
192.168.1.2 booboo # Windows 2003 Svr[*]
192.168.1.4 yogi# Slackware Linux
192.168.1.5 picnic # Slackware Linux
192.168.1.18 basket # MacOS X
192.168.1.19 horse # Solaris 10
192.168.1.20
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 04/12/2012 02:38 PM, Malte Gell wrote:
Any new key servers recommended to use?
No.
pool.sks-keyservers.net isn't really very much of a keyserver. It
doesn't service your requests itself. Instead, it picks a random
known-good keyserver from the global
John Gill wrote:
I know that gpg chooses common algos between the sender and recipient.
(I've not tested what will happen with recipients who have no
preferences in common with my enabled algos, but that's a problem for a
new day.)
3DES will be used. That's why it is an implementation MUST
Abhilash Roy Gollamandala wrote:
Hi,
I am getting the following error:
/bin/bash ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c
'libgpg-error.la http://libgpg-error.la'
'/usr/local/lib/libgpg-error.la http://libgpg-error.la'
libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c
John Gill wrote:
Please point me to a detailed explanation for the output of
list-packets. I have googled and read manuals, etc. but just can't seem
to locate the knowledge.
RFC 4880 - OpenPGP Message Format
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880
You may run into values from
RFC 5581 - The
Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:18, jw72...@verizon.net said:
Outstanding! Hopefully the GPG4Win port for Windows will follow suit before
long. Thanks for an awesome product and support.
I am working on a maintenance release. I also plan to provide an
ultralight installer, for
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 3/14/2012 12:44 AM, brian m. carlson wrote:
From looking at the source, I don't believe so. Note that the only case
in which you have more than one option is Windows/DOS.
GnuPG compiles just fine under the Intel C/C++ compilers, under the GNU
Compiler Collection,
Faramir wrote:
El 06-03-2012 16:58, Peter Lebbing escribió:
...
The keyservers don't do any validation on revocation certificates;
anyone who feels like it can add /invalid/ revocation certificates
to your key to annoy you. But as soon as OpenPGP software imports
the key from the keyserver,
MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Monday 30 January 2012 at 2:13:48 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:52:44 + MFPA articulated:
Looking through recent postings, the signature
delimiter seems to appear in about half of the
messages on this list.
- --
Best regards
MFPA
Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:23:04 +
MFPA articulated:
That is an unfortunate consequence of signing my message with GnuPG;
all lines lose trailing spaces and any line beginning with a dash gets
prefixed with a dash and a space.
That is because you are using inline rather than
MFPA wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2012 at 12:48:30 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
put whatever you like in the name and e-mail fields, and notify the people
you communicate with
Which is exactly what I do already, using a key with MFPA a@b.c as
its sole User ID.
There is no software modification
MFPA wrote:
On Saturday 28 January 2012 at 1:37:17 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
To achieve the two goals, you only need to put each in its own UID. Just
remember once they locate the matching key, they will have all the
information in all the UIDs.
Which is precisely what I don't want. I'm
Peter Lebbing wrote:
And a curious person with a mean streak might sign a key with an obscured
e-mail
address with a signature saying this is the key for
expires2...@rocketmail.com
}:-]. Which is verifiable by hashing the e-mail address. And once keyserver
no-modify is implemented, he'll
Jerome Baum wrote:
On 2012-01-28 06:14, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
It isn't just that no one's written the code: it's there's no community
consensus to deploy such code, even if it were written. It would be a
pretty major flag day. After all, if one keyserver enforces it and
others don't, then
Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/26/2012 15:41, MFPA wrote:
The use of the word harvesting in this context suggests to me a
concern about spamming rather than about privacy. And I would like
the ability to protect my name as well as (or instead of) my email
address.
As I said the last time you
MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 at 3:21:35 PM, in Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Certainly, the keyservers will continue to support non-digested User IDs,
so now tools will need to be able to handle both of them; we'll also need a
policy for end-user agents to answer questions like when
MFPA wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2012 at 3:04:45 PM, Holger wrote:
Please simply accept that it's an issue for me as well as many others.
Harvesting is supereasy: full keydumps are readily available.
Yep, Full keydumps are readily available. http://www.keysigning.org/sks/
Yep, harvesting is
Chris Poole wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:52 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
Because it's also used to sign other people's keys. Using a very large
key (for 256-bit equivalence, ~15kbits) makes verification so slow as to
be unusable. You have to not only verify
Holger wrote:
2012-01-22T16:11:14-08:00, Doug Barton:
On 01/22/2012 10:05, Holger wrote:
I intend to use gpg only for receiving encrypted e-mail, not signing
my outgoing e-mail. Because I don't want my name or e-mail address
out there on the keyservers,
Why not?
One reason is spam,
Barry Smith wrote:
Environ - Windows 7 (64Bit)
SeaMonkey 2.6.1
Enigmail 1.3.4
GnuPG 1.4.9
GPG4Win 2.1.0
GPGShell 3.78 (which is complaining about GPG 1.4.9,
but working)
Problem -- There is no binary install
Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:18 AM, John Clizbe j...@enigmail.net wrote:
Jerry wrote:
It would seem, and this is strictly my own opinion, that if the old
pksd servers are dead then there is no logical reason to continue to
support them. Just my 2¢.
If only all
Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:18 AM, John Clizbe j...@enigmail.net wrote:
Jerry wrote:
It would seem, and this is strictly my own opinion, that if the old
pksd servers are dead then there is no logical reason to continue to
support them. Just my 2¢.
If only all software
Jerry wrote:
It would seem, and this is strictly my own opinion, that if the old
pksd servers are dead then there is no logical reason to continue to
support them. Just my 2¢.
If only all software support decisions were that cut and dried. Oh well...
David Shaw committed patches to the 1.4,
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
Thanks,
I knew about the MSYS method, but not about the others,
but my point was about running gnupg from a flash drive.
I was under the impression that there is no portable way to do that
on a flashdrive that doesn't have these systems installed on the
host
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
So, if , for example, in a case where I don't have my laptop with me, (but I
do have a usb with gpg and keyrings, and a miniDVD with ubuntu),
then, assuming there is no keylogger on the borrowed laptop, what
is the problem with booting from the ubuntu miniDVD, and
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
BTW,
There is a unique advantage to running gnupg from cygwin on
windows, as it's the only way to make use of unix-like commands,
(cat, grep, printf, etc.) and pipe them to and from gnupg.
ONLY? How much effort did you expend looking?
The MinGW compiler folks
Werner Koch wrote:
Hi,
there is a thing for Windows called System Services for Unix (SFU). It
is a modern POSIX implementation on top of the NT kernel but very
different to the old we-need-to-be-compliant-to-gov-ITBs Posix
subsystem. Did anyone ever tried to build a GnuPG on it?
AFAICS
Johan Wevers wrote:
On 16-09-2011 21:30, Simone Cianfriglia wrote:
To achieve your desired result, it's required to run the exactly same
compiler, including the version, with the same options targeting the
correct architecture. Also a minor tweak in architecture settings
could change the
Hauke Laging wrote:
BTW: Would it be a good idea for gpg to suggest the user to check for an
updated version of the key (or do it automatically before if configured to do
so) if it find an expired subkey? This would probably not work with the GUIs
though (but might make the GUI developers
Yard, John wrote:
Forgive the simple gpg syntax issue,
I have
gpg --verbose --trust-model always --yes --armour --recipient X_UCLA
--encrypt $T1
which encrpts a file , I would like to sign it in the same command , I would
like the output to be $T1.asc
gpg -v --yes --trust-model
Charly Avital wrote:
Hi,
in the avalanche of news about the [recently] late Osama Bin Laden, I
noticed a small item: the area where he was caught had been *also*
defined/pinpointed by the lack of cellular phone communications.
Among other anomalies at the compound: No cell traffic, no
David Shaw wrote:
There is/was a HOWTO document for this method of handling keys written at one
point. I can't seem to find the link at the moment, but if someone has it
handy, please do post it.
Adrian von Bidder's How-To, http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/subkeys, comes to mind.
It's linked on the
Kevin Kammer wrote:
Let us suppose that we have more than one private key on our keychain.
Safe bet.
For this example, let's say we use one key to sign our personal email, and a
different one to sign software packages we host on a company server. There
may be settings in our gpg.conf
Christopher Tran wrote:
Whats the easiest way to keep GPG keys synced between my computers? Like, I
have my MacBook, which is usually my main machine, but I also have my netbook
which I prefer carrying around and sometimes I update my key with User IDs on
either machine but the only way I have
Mike Acker wrote:
thanks for the note
i have PGP/MIME set ON so this should not happen (and HTML has to be MIMEd )
from your note it sounds like Thunderbird is sending BOTH .txt and .html
formats. I would expect your e/mail client to selecvt one of these --
and either should verify --
Stephen H. Dawson wrote:
Dire need, hoping for help.
I have my private and public keys, but you have neither the passphrase
nor a revocation certificate. I need to revoke my published key. Can
they recommend a bash script to discover the passphrase using brute
force on the private key?
Pramod.R wrote:
Hi,
We are migrating from pgp 6.5.8 to gpg 1.4.11. I had a question
regarding the migration of the public keys and the private keys:
Is there a way where I could migrate the entire key ring at one go? I’m
currently extracting my keys from pgp using the pgp –dx key-id
Bernhard Kleine wrote:
Hi,
i wonder whether the keys from several members of this maillist should
be available from the keyserver. e.g. Grant Olson signs all his messages
here. evolution and gpg on ubuntu, however, fail to retrieve the public
key from the server:
the message always
John Clizbe wrote:
Bernhard Kleine wrote:
Hi,
i wonder whether the keys from several members of this maillist should
be available from the keyserver. e.g. Grant Olson signs all his messages
here. evolution and gpg on ubuntu, however, fail to retrieve the public
key from the server:
My
Bernhard Kleine wrote:
I am quite sure that Grant Olson's key is on the keyserver, thus there
is no matter of hiding it, as robert j.hansen suggested. however, i
wonder why i can't retrieve it.
gpg --search-keys A18A54D
gpg: Suche nach A18A54D von hkp Server pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpg:
Bronson K Shadlock wrote:
Hi there,
We are using GnuGP 1.1.3 on a few PCs, all able to decrypt using 1 public
Do you mean GPG4Win 1.1.3?
GnuPG 1.1.3 (if it existed) would date back to circa 2000.
key. I can use it on my PC, but a new user on a new PC is getting constant
errors. I've
123098 wrote:
I've made a script that (among other things) encrypts some sensitive data
that I have to send afterwards to a different user on a different computer.
If I encrypt the data by command-line I have no problem at all and
everything goes smoothly. However, when I try to get cron to
Mike Acker wrote:
I really liked the idea of having the Membership Secretary sign a Public
Keyring for the Group Members and then to circulate that keyring to the
membership.
That's just super-neato great, but what does it have to do with the message
thread you replied to dealing with 4096-bit
Jerome Baum wrote:
Nicholas Cole nicholas.c...@gmail.com writes:
Please remove my name from future replies on this thread.
I did not ask to be included nor do I wish to be included.
Thank you.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gayamantra wrote:
Hi,
We are intending to use GNUPG to encrypt a file before we FTP it to an
external party.
Is it possible to use GNUPG as a standalone client without having to install
in on our servers?
Yes, GnuPG may be installed on a workstation and accessed at the command line,
Jerome Baum wrote:
Grant Olson k...@grant-olson.net writes:
On 03/22/2011 06:06 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
I really wish 8192 would become available. Not that it would be the end
all/be all of key security but according to your theory it sounds much
more difficult to crack.
The actual
Mike Acker wrote:
Is PGP/ENIGMAIL compatible with folks using Outlook or Microsoft Mail
with PGP Desktop?
I've tried searching for this but no luck,-- :-(
Enigmail is an extension for Thunderbird and Mozilla mail. It uses GnuPG for its
cryptographic processing. It conforms to RFC2 4880 and
Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 12/03/11 6:26 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
That's the SKS implementation of the key database. On top of the
keys, there are several other tables. Within each table there is
also empty space, most commonly space left at the end of a page.
The present size of just the raw
Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 11/03/11 12:10 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Not at all. Every few days the keyserver network posts complete dumps
of all the certificates in the system. (Or, more accurately, various
people within the network do.) This exists so that new volunteers who
want to
Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 12/03/11 12:33 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2011 1:07 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Out of curiosity, how big is that now?
My complete /var/lib/sks/DB directory comes in at 7.8G. Not too large.
That's smaller than I would have thought, but a *lot* larger than the
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 2/25/11 10:27 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On 02/25/2011 07:39 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Bruce himself recommends AES over TWOFISH.
[citation needed]
_Practical Cryptography_. Read it. Other people on this list can
provide a page ref: I'm at a funeral in the
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
