On 13/01/2014, Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
On 12/01/14 00:18, Sam Kuper wrote:
Again, perhaps I am wrong. But if I am not, then the use of OpenPGP
cards with non-pinpad readers still makes no sense (at least, not to
me).
Since most readers don't filter VERIFY commands
Yes
On 09/04/2014, Kapil Aggarwal ka...@hotmail.com wrote:
Now, what will help drive this adoption more?
All thoughts are very much welcome and appreciated.
One possible answer: https://www.mailpile.is/faq/
I haven't tried it myself, btw.
___
On Jan 12, 2014 3:52 AM, MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
wrote:
Sam Kuper wrote:
Yes, as I said, it could tamper with the message. But
if it does that, then when a recipient attempts to
verify the signature, gpg --verify will give the
message, gpg: BAD signature
On 07/01/2014, Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
On 07/01/14 17:27, Werner Koch wrote:
See the card HOWTO or try gpg --card-edit, admin, help.
Additionally, in the OpenPGP Card 2.0.1 spec, the DO with tag C4 on page
17,
section 7.2.2 (VERIFY) and section 7.2.8 (PSO: COMPUTE
On Jan 9, 2014 7:16 PM, David Tomaschik da...@systemoverlord.com wrote:
if the machine you are using for crypto operations is compromised, you have
lost (at least for the operations conducted while it is compromised)
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't entirely accept this. Surely if you are
On 11/01/2014, David Tomaschik da...@systemoverlord.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Sam Kuper sam.ku...@uclmail.net wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014 7:16 PM, David Tomaschik da...@systemoverlord.com
wrote:
if the machine you are using for crypto operations is compromised, you
have lost
On 07/01/2014, Sam Kuper sam.ku...@uclmail.net wrote:
On 06/01/2014, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
The question is whether this is really helpful. Yes, it protects your
PIN
That is helpful. No question about this part!
Perhaps I should be clearer about why I believe it is unquestionably
Dear Werner,
Thank you for your kind reply.
On 06/01/2014, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
The question is whether this is really helpful. Yes, it protects your
PIN
That is helpful. No question about this part!
After a successful verification of the PIN the card allows the use of
the
On Jan 5, 2014 1:18 PM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 05:02, sam.ku...@uclmail.net said:
Take care: The Omnikey does not work with free software and 2048 bit
or larger keys. Better get a Gemalto or Identive (SCM) reader.
Thanks for the warning :)
In group 2 above,
On 05/01/2014, Sam Kuper sam.ku...@uclmail.net wrote:
In group 2 above, the smallest reader I have found online which offers
secure PIN entry is the ACR83.
Hm, I've now found several mailing list and forum discussions, etc,
that indicate the ACR83 is not compatible with OpenPGP cards. That's
Dear GnuPG users,
I am new to this list, so please be gentle.
At some point in the coming months, I may try to obtain an OpenPGP
smart card and reader.
At the moment, such combinations, whether separable or combined into a
single device, seem to be available in two form factors, neither of
11 matches
Mail list logo
